Rates of assay success and genotyping error when single nucleotide polymorphism genotyping in non‐model organisms: a case study in the Antarctic fur seal

Abstract Although single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) are increasingly being recognized as powerful molecular markers, their application to non‐model organisms can bring significant challenges. Among these are imperfect conversion rates of assays designed from in silico resources and the enhanced...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Published in:Molecular Ecology Resources
Main Authors: HOFFMAN, J. I., TUCKER, R., BRIDGETT, S. J., CLARK, M. S., FORCADA, J., SLATE, J.
Format: Article in Journal/Newspaper
Language:English
Published: Wiley 2012
Subjects:
Online Access:http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1755-0998.2012.03158.x
https://api.wiley.com/onlinelibrary/tdm/v1/articles/10.1111%2Fj.1755-0998.2012.03158.x
https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111/j.1755-0998.2012.03158.x
https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full-xml/10.1111/j.1755-0998.2012.03158.x
id crwiley:10.1111/j.1755-0998.2012.03158.x
record_format openpolar
spelling crwiley:10.1111/j.1755-0998.2012.03158.x 2024-09-15T17:45:35+00:00 Rates of assay success and genotyping error when single nucleotide polymorphism genotyping in non‐model organisms: a case study in the Antarctic fur seal HOFFMAN, J. I. TUCKER, R. BRIDGETT, S. J. CLARK, M. S. FORCADA, J. SLATE, J. 2012 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1755-0998.2012.03158.x https://api.wiley.com/onlinelibrary/tdm/v1/articles/10.1111%2Fj.1755-0998.2012.03158.x https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111/j.1755-0998.2012.03158.x https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full-xml/10.1111/j.1755-0998.2012.03158.x en eng Wiley http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/termsAndConditions#vor Molecular Ecology Resources volume 12, issue 5, page 861-872 ISSN 1755-098X 1755-0998 journal-article 2012 crwiley https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1755-0998.2012.03158.x 2024-08-06T04:16:13Z Abstract Although single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) are increasingly being recognized as powerful molecular markers, their application to non‐model organisms can bring significant challenges. Among these are imperfect conversion rates of assays designed from in silico resources and the enhanced potential for genotyping error relative to pre‐validated, highly optimized human SNPs. To explore these issues, we used Illumina’s GoldenGate assay to genotype 480 Antarctic fur seal ( Arctocephalus gazella ) individuals at 144 putative SNPs derived from a 454 transcriptome assembly. One hundred and thirty‐five polymorphic SNPs (93.8%) were automatically validated by the program GenomeStudio, and the initial genotyping error rate, estimated from nine replicate samples, was 0.004 per reaction. However, an almost tenfold further reduction in the error rate was achieved by excluding 31 loci (21.5%) that exhibited unclear clustering patterns, manually editing clusters to allow rescoring of ambiguous or incorrect genotypes, and excluding 18 samples (3.8%) with unreliable genotypes. After stringent quality filtering, we also found a counter‐intuitive negative relationship between in silico minor allele frequency and the conversion rate, suggesting that some of our assays may have been designed from paralogous loci. Nevertheless, we obtained over 45 000 individual SNP genotypes with a final error rate of 0.0005, indicating that the GoldenGate assay is eminently capable of generating large, high‐quality data sets for non‐model organisms. This has positive implications for future studies of the evolutionary, behavioural and conservation genetics of natural populations. Article in Journal/Newspaper Antarc* Antarctic Antarctic Fur Seal Arctocephalus gazella Wiley Online Library Molecular Ecology Resources 12 5 861 872
institution Open Polar
collection Wiley Online Library
op_collection_id crwiley
language English
description Abstract Although single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) are increasingly being recognized as powerful molecular markers, their application to non‐model organisms can bring significant challenges. Among these are imperfect conversion rates of assays designed from in silico resources and the enhanced potential for genotyping error relative to pre‐validated, highly optimized human SNPs. To explore these issues, we used Illumina’s GoldenGate assay to genotype 480 Antarctic fur seal ( Arctocephalus gazella ) individuals at 144 putative SNPs derived from a 454 transcriptome assembly. One hundred and thirty‐five polymorphic SNPs (93.8%) were automatically validated by the program GenomeStudio, and the initial genotyping error rate, estimated from nine replicate samples, was 0.004 per reaction. However, an almost tenfold further reduction in the error rate was achieved by excluding 31 loci (21.5%) that exhibited unclear clustering patterns, manually editing clusters to allow rescoring of ambiguous or incorrect genotypes, and excluding 18 samples (3.8%) with unreliable genotypes. After stringent quality filtering, we also found a counter‐intuitive negative relationship between in silico minor allele frequency and the conversion rate, suggesting that some of our assays may have been designed from paralogous loci. Nevertheless, we obtained over 45 000 individual SNP genotypes with a final error rate of 0.0005, indicating that the GoldenGate assay is eminently capable of generating large, high‐quality data sets for non‐model organisms. This has positive implications for future studies of the evolutionary, behavioural and conservation genetics of natural populations.
format Article in Journal/Newspaper
author HOFFMAN, J. I.
TUCKER, R.
BRIDGETT, S. J.
CLARK, M. S.
FORCADA, J.
SLATE, J.
spellingShingle HOFFMAN, J. I.
TUCKER, R.
BRIDGETT, S. J.
CLARK, M. S.
FORCADA, J.
SLATE, J.
Rates of assay success and genotyping error when single nucleotide polymorphism genotyping in non‐model organisms: a case study in the Antarctic fur seal
author_facet HOFFMAN, J. I.
TUCKER, R.
BRIDGETT, S. J.
CLARK, M. S.
FORCADA, J.
SLATE, J.
author_sort HOFFMAN, J. I.
title Rates of assay success and genotyping error when single nucleotide polymorphism genotyping in non‐model organisms: a case study in the Antarctic fur seal
title_short Rates of assay success and genotyping error when single nucleotide polymorphism genotyping in non‐model organisms: a case study in the Antarctic fur seal
title_full Rates of assay success and genotyping error when single nucleotide polymorphism genotyping in non‐model organisms: a case study in the Antarctic fur seal
title_fullStr Rates of assay success and genotyping error when single nucleotide polymorphism genotyping in non‐model organisms: a case study in the Antarctic fur seal
title_full_unstemmed Rates of assay success and genotyping error when single nucleotide polymorphism genotyping in non‐model organisms: a case study in the Antarctic fur seal
title_sort rates of assay success and genotyping error when single nucleotide polymorphism genotyping in non‐model organisms: a case study in the antarctic fur seal
publisher Wiley
publishDate 2012
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1755-0998.2012.03158.x
https://api.wiley.com/onlinelibrary/tdm/v1/articles/10.1111%2Fj.1755-0998.2012.03158.x
https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111/j.1755-0998.2012.03158.x
https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full-xml/10.1111/j.1755-0998.2012.03158.x
genre Antarc*
Antarctic
Antarctic Fur Seal
Arctocephalus gazella
genre_facet Antarc*
Antarctic
Antarctic Fur Seal
Arctocephalus gazella
op_source Molecular Ecology Resources
volume 12, issue 5, page 861-872
ISSN 1755-098X 1755-0998
op_rights http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/termsAndConditions#vor
op_doi https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1755-0998.2012.03158.x
container_title Molecular Ecology Resources
container_volume 12
container_issue 5
container_start_page 861
op_container_end_page 872
_version_ 1810493462617784320