Norman Wells impact funding: boon or bust?

Abstract: The Norman Wells project involved a tenfold expansion of the Norman Wells oilfield and construction of a 324‐mm (12‐inch) pipeline extending 870 kilometres up the Mackenzie Valley to northern Alberta. Completed in May 1985 after years of controversy, Norman Wells expansion was the first of...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Published in:Canadian Public Administration
Main Author: Rees, William E.
Format: Article in Journal/Newspaper
Language:English
Published: Wiley 1989
Subjects:
Online Access:http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1754-7121.1989.tb01345.x
https://api.wiley.com/onlinelibrary/tdm/v1/articles/10.1111%2Fj.1754-7121.1989.tb01345.x
https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111/j.1754-7121.1989.tb01345.x
id crwiley:10.1111/j.1754-7121.1989.tb01345.x
record_format openpolar
spelling crwiley:10.1111/j.1754-7121.1989.tb01345.x 2023-12-03T10:25:41+01:00 Norman Wells impact funding: boon or bust? Rees, William E. 1989 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1754-7121.1989.tb01345.x https://api.wiley.com/onlinelibrary/tdm/v1/articles/10.1111%2Fj.1754-7121.1989.tb01345.x https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111/j.1754-7121.1989.tb01345.x en eng Wiley http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/termsAndConditions#vor Canadian Public Administration volume 32, issue 1, page 104-123 ISSN 0008-4840 1754-7121 Public Administration Sociology and Political Science journal-article 1989 crwiley https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1754-7121.1989.tb01345.x 2023-11-09T14:32:16Z Abstract: The Norman Wells project involved a tenfold expansion of the Norman Wells oilfield and construction of a 324‐mm (12‐inch) pipeline extending 870 kilometres up the Mackenzie Valley to northern Alberta. Completed in May 1985 after years of controversy, Norman Wells expansion was the first of several large hydrocarbon production and transportation projects likely to be completed in the Mackenzie Valley by the end of the century. Because of a highly innovative approach to project management, Norman Wells has been heralded as a model for future northern development projects. Construction was delayed seventeen months from the time of project approval in part to permit effective planning and the use of “special measures” during the construction phase. A major component of these special measures was the unique Norman Wells impact funding program set up to help manage negative effects and enable native involvement in the project. This paper assesses the planning and administration of two socioeconomic components of the impact funding program, using seven criteria drawn from the literature on socioeconomic monitoring and management. The subject programs failed to satisfy all but one criterion. Indeed, the administrative mechanisms used proved to be an serious impediment to effective socioeconomic impact management. This failure was rooted both in the politics of the impact funding package itself and in the historical modus operandi of the federal government, particularly the Department of Indian Affairs and Northern Development, in the north. Sommaire: Le project Norman Wells comprenait l'expansion en 10 volets du champ pétrolifère du même nom et la construction d'un oléoduc de 324 mm de diamètre, s'étendant sur 870 kilomètres le long de la vallée Mackenzie jusqu'au nord de 1'Alberta. Ce projet, qui a été terminé en mai 1985 après des années de polémique, était le premier de plusieurs grands projets dans le secteur de la production et de l'acheminement des hydrocarbures à avoir toutes les chances d'être fini ... Article in Journal/Newspaper Mackenzie Valley Wiley Online Library (via Crossref) Indian Mackenzie Valley ENVELOPE(-126.070,-126.070,52.666,52.666) Norman Wells ENVELOPE(-126.833,-126.833,65.282,65.282) Canadian Public Administration 32 1 104 123
institution Open Polar
collection Wiley Online Library (via Crossref)
op_collection_id crwiley
language English
topic Public Administration
Sociology and Political Science
spellingShingle Public Administration
Sociology and Political Science
Rees, William E.
Norman Wells impact funding: boon or bust?
topic_facet Public Administration
Sociology and Political Science
description Abstract: The Norman Wells project involved a tenfold expansion of the Norman Wells oilfield and construction of a 324‐mm (12‐inch) pipeline extending 870 kilometres up the Mackenzie Valley to northern Alberta. Completed in May 1985 after years of controversy, Norman Wells expansion was the first of several large hydrocarbon production and transportation projects likely to be completed in the Mackenzie Valley by the end of the century. Because of a highly innovative approach to project management, Norman Wells has been heralded as a model for future northern development projects. Construction was delayed seventeen months from the time of project approval in part to permit effective planning and the use of “special measures” during the construction phase. A major component of these special measures was the unique Norman Wells impact funding program set up to help manage negative effects and enable native involvement in the project. This paper assesses the planning and administration of two socioeconomic components of the impact funding program, using seven criteria drawn from the literature on socioeconomic monitoring and management. The subject programs failed to satisfy all but one criterion. Indeed, the administrative mechanisms used proved to be an serious impediment to effective socioeconomic impact management. This failure was rooted both in the politics of the impact funding package itself and in the historical modus operandi of the federal government, particularly the Department of Indian Affairs and Northern Development, in the north. Sommaire: Le project Norman Wells comprenait l'expansion en 10 volets du champ pétrolifère du même nom et la construction d'un oléoduc de 324 mm de diamètre, s'étendant sur 870 kilomètres le long de la vallée Mackenzie jusqu'au nord de 1'Alberta. Ce projet, qui a été terminé en mai 1985 après des années de polémique, était le premier de plusieurs grands projets dans le secteur de la production et de l'acheminement des hydrocarbures à avoir toutes les chances d'être fini ...
format Article in Journal/Newspaper
author Rees, William E.
author_facet Rees, William E.
author_sort Rees, William E.
title Norman Wells impact funding: boon or bust?
title_short Norman Wells impact funding: boon or bust?
title_full Norman Wells impact funding: boon or bust?
title_fullStr Norman Wells impact funding: boon or bust?
title_full_unstemmed Norman Wells impact funding: boon or bust?
title_sort norman wells impact funding: boon or bust?
publisher Wiley
publishDate 1989
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1754-7121.1989.tb01345.x
https://api.wiley.com/onlinelibrary/tdm/v1/articles/10.1111%2Fj.1754-7121.1989.tb01345.x
https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111/j.1754-7121.1989.tb01345.x
long_lat ENVELOPE(-126.070,-126.070,52.666,52.666)
ENVELOPE(-126.833,-126.833,65.282,65.282)
geographic Indian
Mackenzie Valley
Norman Wells
geographic_facet Indian
Mackenzie Valley
Norman Wells
genre Mackenzie Valley
genre_facet Mackenzie Valley
op_source Canadian Public Administration
volume 32, issue 1, page 104-123
ISSN 0008-4840 1754-7121
op_rights http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/termsAndConditions#vor
op_doi https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1754-7121.1989.tb01345.x
container_title Canadian Public Administration
container_volume 32
container_issue 1
container_start_page 104
op_container_end_page 123
_version_ 1784274672008822784