Norman Wells impact funding: boon or bust?
Abstract: The Norman Wells project involved a tenfold expansion of the Norman Wells oilfield and construction of a 324‐mm (12‐inch) pipeline extending 870 kilometres up the Mackenzie Valley to northern Alberta. Completed in May 1985 after years of controversy, Norman Wells expansion was the first of...
Published in: | Canadian Public Administration |
---|---|
Main Author: | |
Format: | Article in Journal/Newspaper |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Wiley
1989
|
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1754-7121.1989.tb01345.x https://api.wiley.com/onlinelibrary/tdm/v1/articles/10.1111%2Fj.1754-7121.1989.tb01345.x https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111/j.1754-7121.1989.tb01345.x |
id |
crwiley:10.1111/j.1754-7121.1989.tb01345.x |
---|---|
record_format |
openpolar |
spelling |
crwiley:10.1111/j.1754-7121.1989.tb01345.x 2023-12-03T10:25:41+01:00 Norman Wells impact funding: boon or bust? Rees, William E. 1989 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1754-7121.1989.tb01345.x https://api.wiley.com/onlinelibrary/tdm/v1/articles/10.1111%2Fj.1754-7121.1989.tb01345.x https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111/j.1754-7121.1989.tb01345.x en eng Wiley http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/termsAndConditions#vor Canadian Public Administration volume 32, issue 1, page 104-123 ISSN 0008-4840 1754-7121 Public Administration Sociology and Political Science journal-article 1989 crwiley https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1754-7121.1989.tb01345.x 2023-11-09T14:32:16Z Abstract: The Norman Wells project involved a tenfold expansion of the Norman Wells oilfield and construction of a 324‐mm (12‐inch) pipeline extending 870 kilometres up the Mackenzie Valley to northern Alberta. Completed in May 1985 after years of controversy, Norman Wells expansion was the first of several large hydrocarbon production and transportation projects likely to be completed in the Mackenzie Valley by the end of the century. Because of a highly innovative approach to project management, Norman Wells has been heralded as a model for future northern development projects. Construction was delayed seventeen months from the time of project approval in part to permit effective planning and the use of “special measures” during the construction phase. A major component of these special measures was the unique Norman Wells impact funding program set up to help manage negative effects and enable native involvement in the project. This paper assesses the planning and administration of two socioeconomic components of the impact funding program, using seven criteria drawn from the literature on socioeconomic monitoring and management. The subject programs failed to satisfy all but one criterion. Indeed, the administrative mechanisms used proved to be an serious impediment to effective socioeconomic impact management. This failure was rooted both in the politics of the impact funding package itself and in the historical modus operandi of the federal government, particularly the Department of Indian Affairs and Northern Development, in the north. Sommaire: Le project Norman Wells comprenait l'expansion en 10 volets du champ pétrolifère du même nom et la construction d'un oléoduc de 324 mm de diamètre, s'étendant sur 870 kilomètres le long de la vallée Mackenzie jusqu'au nord de 1'Alberta. Ce projet, qui a été terminé en mai 1985 après des années de polémique, était le premier de plusieurs grands projets dans le secteur de la production et de l'acheminement des hydrocarbures à avoir toutes les chances d'être fini ... Article in Journal/Newspaper Mackenzie Valley Wiley Online Library (via Crossref) Indian Mackenzie Valley ENVELOPE(-126.070,-126.070,52.666,52.666) Norman Wells ENVELOPE(-126.833,-126.833,65.282,65.282) Canadian Public Administration 32 1 104 123 |
institution |
Open Polar |
collection |
Wiley Online Library (via Crossref) |
op_collection_id |
crwiley |
language |
English |
topic |
Public Administration Sociology and Political Science |
spellingShingle |
Public Administration Sociology and Political Science Rees, William E. Norman Wells impact funding: boon or bust? |
topic_facet |
Public Administration Sociology and Political Science |
description |
Abstract: The Norman Wells project involved a tenfold expansion of the Norman Wells oilfield and construction of a 324‐mm (12‐inch) pipeline extending 870 kilometres up the Mackenzie Valley to northern Alberta. Completed in May 1985 after years of controversy, Norman Wells expansion was the first of several large hydrocarbon production and transportation projects likely to be completed in the Mackenzie Valley by the end of the century. Because of a highly innovative approach to project management, Norman Wells has been heralded as a model for future northern development projects. Construction was delayed seventeen months from the time of project approval in part to permit effective planning and the use of “special measures” during the construction phase. A major component of these special measures was the unique Norman Wells impact funding program set up to help manage negative effects and enable native involvement in the project. This paper assesses the planning and administration of two socioeconomic components of the impact funding program, using seven criteria drawn from the literature on socioeconomic monitoring and management. The subject programs failed to satisfy all but one criterion. Indeed, the administrative mechanisms used proved to be an serious impediment to effective socioeconomic impact management. This failure was rooted both in the politics of the impact funding package itself and in the historical modus operandi of the federal government, particularly the Department of Indian Affairs and Northern Development, in the north. Sommaire: Le project Norman Wells comprenait l'expansion en 10 volets du champ pétrolifère du même nom et la construction d'un oléoduc de 324 mm de diamètre, s'étendant sur 870 kilomètres le long de la vallée Mackenzie jusqu'au nord de 1'Alberta. Ce projet, qui a été terminé en mai 1985 après des années de polémique, était le premier de plusieurs grands projets dans le secteur de la production et de l'acheminement des hydrocarbures à avoir toutes les chances d'être fini ... |
format |
Article in Journal/Newspaper |
author |
Rees, William E. |
author_facet |
Rees, William E. |
author_sort |
Rees, William E. |
title |
Norman Wells impact funding: boon or bust? |
title_short |
Norman Wells impact funding: boon or bust? |
title_full |
Norman Wells impact funding: boon or bust? |
title_fullStr |
Norman Wells impact funding: boon or bust? |
title_full_unstemmed |
Norman Wells impact funding: boon or bust? |
title_sort |
norman wells impact funding: boon or bust? |
publisher |
Wiley |
publishDate |
1989 |
url |
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1754-7121.1989.tb01345.x https://api.wiley.com/onlinelibrary/tdm/v1/articles/10.1111%2Fj.1754-7121.1989.tb01345.x https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111/j.1754-7121.1989.tb01345.x |
long_lat |
ENVELOPE(-126.070,-126.070,52.666,52.666) ENVELOPE(-126.833,-126.833,65.282,65.282) |
geographic |
Indian Mackenzie Valley Norman Wells |
geographic_facet |
Indian Mackenzie Valley Norman Wells |
genre |
Mackenzie Valley |
genre_facet |
Mackenzie Valley |
op_source |
Canadian Public Administration volume 32, issue 1, page 104-123 ISSN 0008-4840 1754-7121 |
op_rights |
http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/termsAndConditions#vor |
op_doi |
https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1754-7121.1989.tb01345.x |
container_title |
Canadian Public Administration |
container_volume |
32 |
container_issue |
1 |
container_start_page |
104 |
op_container_end_page |
123 |
_version_ |
1784274672008822784 |