Relative importance of diagnostic delays in different head and neck cancers

Objectives: Clinical stage at the time of diagnosis is the most important determinant of prognosis in head and neck cancer. Previously, longer diagnostic delay has been shown to worsen prognosis in cancer of tongue, pharynx and larynx. The aim of this study was to evaluate the relative importance of...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Published in:Clinical Otolaryngology
Main Authors: Teppo, H., Alho, O.‐P.
Format: Article in Journal/Newspaper
Language:English
Published: Wiley 2008
Subjects:
Online Access:http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1749-4486.2008.01704.x
https://api.wiley.com/onlinelibrary/tdm/v1/articles/10.1111%2Fj.1749-4486.2008.01704.x
https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111/j.1749-4486.2008.01704.x
id crwiley:10.1111/j.1749-4486.2008.01704.x
record_format openpolar
spelling crwiley:10.1111/j.1749-4486.2008.01704.x 2023-12-03T10:27:47+01:00 Relative importance of diagnostic delays in different head and neck cancers Teppo, H. Alho, O.‐P. 2008 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1749-4486.2008.01704.x https://api.wiley.com/onlinelibrary/tdm/v1/articles/10.1111%2Fj.1749-4486.2008.01704.x https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111/j.1749-4486.2008.01704.x en eng Wiley http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/termsAndConditions#vor Clinical Otolaryngology volume 33, issue 4, page 325-330 ISSN 1749-4478 1749-4486 Otorhinolaryngology journal-article 2008 crwiley https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1749-4486.2008.01704.x 2023-11-09T14:09:19Z Objectives: Clinical stage at the time of diagnosis is the most important determinant of prognosis in head and neck cancer. Previously, longer diagnostic delay has been shown to worsen prognosis in cancer of tongue, pharynx and larynx. The aim of this study was to evaluate the relative importance of patient and professional diagnostic delays in the prognosis of these head and neck cancers. Design: Population‐based retrospective cohort study. Setting: Oulu University Hospital (tertiary referral centre) district, Northern Finland. Participants: Population‐based cohort of 221 patients with tongue, pharyngeal or laryngeal cancer diagnosed in 1986–1996. Main outcome measures: Patient and professional diagnostic delays, overall survival. Results: Delays were significantly longer in laryngeal cancer. Moreover, longer diagnostic delays worsened survival markedly only in laryngeal cancer. Cut‐off points at which the delays showed significant adverse impact in prognosis of laryngeal cancer were ≥3 months in patient delay and ≥6 months in professional delay. If mirror laryngoscopy was not performed at the initial visit, professional delay in laryngeal cancer turned out to be significantly longer. Conclusions: Diagnostic delays are longer and have a more significant impact on survival in laryngeal cancer than in lingual or pharyngeal cancer. Thus, patients with symptoms suggestive of laryngeal process should always be examined properly at the initial visit in order to shorten the professional diagnostic delay in laryngeal cancer. Article in Journal/Newspaper Northern Finland Wiley Online Library (via Crossref) Clinical Otolaryngology 33 4 325 330
institution Open Polar
collection Wiley Online Library (via Crossref)
op_collection_id crwiley
language English
topic Otorhinolaryngology
spellingShingle Otorhinolaryngology
Teppo, H.
Alho, O.‐P.
Relative importance of diagnostic delays in different head and neck cancers
topic_facet Otorhinolaryngology
description Objectives: Clinical stage at the time of diagnosis is the most important determinant of prognosis in head and neck cancer. Previously, longer diagnostic delay has been shown to worsen prognosis in cancer of tongue, pharynx and larynx. The aim of this study was to evaluate the relative importance of patient and professional diagnostic delays in the prognosis of these head and neck cancers. Design: Population‐based retrospective cohort study. Setting: Oulu University Hospital (tertiary referral centre) district, Northern Finland. Participants: Population‐based cohort of 221 patients with tongue, pharyngeal or laryngeal cancer diagnosed in 1986–1996. Main outcome measures: Patient and professional diagnostic delays, overall survival. Results: Delays were significantly longer in laryngeal cancer. Moreover, longer diagnostic delays worsened survival markedly only in laryngeal cancer. Cut‐off points at which the delays showed significant adverse impact in prognosis of laryngeal cancer were ≥3 months in patient delay and ≥6 months in professional delay. If mirror laryngoscopy was not performed at the initial visit, professional delay in laryngeal cancer turned out to be significantly longer. Conclusions: Diagnostic delays are longer and have a more significant impact on survival in laryngeal cancer than in lingual or pharyngeal cancer. Thus, patients with symptoms suggestive of laryngeal process should always be examined properly at the initial visit in order to shorten the professional diagnostic delay in laryngeal cancer.
format Article in Journal/Newspaper
author Teppo, H.
Alho, O.‐P.
author_facet Teppo, H.
Alho, O.‐P.
author_sort Teppo, H.
title Relative importance of diagnostic delays in different head and neck cancers
title_short Relative importance of diagnostic delays in different head and neck cancers
title_full Relative importance of diagnostic delays in different head and neck cancers
title_fullStr Relative importance of diagnostic delays in different head and neck cancers
title_full_unstemmed Relative importance of diagnostic delays in different head and neck cancers
title_sort relative importance of diagnostic delays in different head and neck cancers
publisher Wiley
publishDate 2008
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1749-4486.2008.01704.x
https://api.wiley.com/onlinelibrary/tdm/v1/articles/10.1111%2Fj.1749-4486.2008.01704.x
https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111/j.1749-4486.2008.01704.x
genre Northern Finland
genre_facet Northern Finland
op_source Clinical Otolaryngology
volume 33, issue 4, page 325-330
ISSN 1749-4478 1749-4486
op_rights http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/termsAndConditions#vor
op_doi https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1749-4486.2008.01704.x
container_title Clinical Otolaryngology
container_volume 33
container_issue 4
container_start_page 325
op_container_end_page 330
_version_ 1784277671970078720