Determining a correction factor for aerial surveys of harbor seals in California

Abstract Counts of pinnipeds provide a minimal estimate of population size because some unknown proportion of individuals is in the water during surveys. We determined a correction factor (CF) for Pacific harbor seals ( Phoca vitulina richardii ) by estimating the proportion ashore of 180 seals tagg...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Published in:Marine Mammal Science
Main Authors: Harvey, James T., Goley, Dawn
Format: Article in Journal/Newspaper
Language:English
Published: Wiley 2011
Subjects:
Online Access:http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1748-7692.2010.00446.x
https://api.wiley.com/onlinelibrary/tdm/v1/articles/10.1111%2Fj.1748-7692.2010.00446.x
https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111/j.1748-7692.2010.00446.x
id crwiley:10.1111/j.1748-7692.2010.00446.x
record_format openpolar
spelling crwiley:10.1111/j.1748-7692.2010.00446.x 2023-12-03T10:29:05+01:00 Determining a correction factor for aerial surveys of harbor seals in California Harvey, James T. Goley, Dawn 2011 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1748-7692.2010.00446.x https://api.wiley.com/onlinelibrary/tdm/v1/articles/10.1111%2Fj.1748-7692.2010.00446.x https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111/j.1748-7692.2010.00446.x en eng Wiley http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/termsAndConditions#vor Marine Mammal Science volume 27, issue 4, page 719-735 ISSN 0824-0469 1748-7692 Aquatic Science Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics journal-article 2011 crwiley https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1748-7692.2010.00446.x 2023-11-09T14:03:06Z Abstract Counts of pinnipeds provide a minimal estimate of population size because some unknown proportion of individuals is in the water during surveys. We determined a correction factor (CF) for Pacific harbor seals ( Phoca vitulina richardii ) by estimating the proportion ashore of 180 seals tagged with flipper‐mounted radio tags throughout California. The mean proportions of tagged individuals ashore during four complete surveys in 2004 were not different between central and northern California ( F = 1.85, P = 0.18) or between sexes ( F = 0.57, P = 0.45), but a lesser proportion of weaners was ashore than subadults or adults ( F = 7.97, P = 0.001), especially in northern California. The CF calculated for the statewide census of harbor seals was 1.65, using transmitters operating during the survey ( n = 114). Using a mark‐recapture estimator for tag survival ( phi ) and the four telemetry surveys the mean CF for central and northern California was 1.54 ± 0.38 (95% CI). A CF for southern California of 2.86 was based on a single survey. Using the mean CF of 1.54 and a statewide count in 2009 we estimated 30,196 (95% CI = 22,745–37,647) harbor seals in California. Article in Journal/Newspaper Phoca vitulina Wiley Online Library (via Crossref) Pacific Marine Mammal Science 27 4 719 735
institution Open Polar
collection Wiley Online Library (via Crossref)
op_collection_id crwiley
language English
topic Aquatic Science
Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics
spellingShingle Aquatic Science
Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics
Harvey, James T.
Goley, Dawn
Determining a correction factor for aerial surveys of harbor seals in California
topic_facet Aquatic Science
Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics
description Abstract Counts of pinnipeds provide a minimal estimate of population size because some unknown proportion of individuals is in the water during surveys. We determined a correction factor (CF) for Pacific harbor seals ( Phoca vitulina richardii ) by estimating the proportion ashore of 180 seals tagged with flipper‐mounted radio tags throughout California. The mean proportions of tagged individuals ashore during four complete surveys in 2004 were not different between central and northern California ( F = 1.85, P = 0.18) or between sexes ( F = 0.57, P = 0.45), but a lesser proportion of weaners was ashore than subadults or adults ( F = 7.97, P = 0.001), especially in northern California. The CF calculated for the statewide census of harbor seals was 1.65, using transmitters operating during the survey ( n = 114). Using a mark‐recapture estimator for tag survival ( phi ) and the four telemetry surveys the mean CF for central and northern California was 1.54 ± 0.38 (95% CI). A CF for southern California of 2.86 was based on a single survey. Using the mean CF of 1.54 and a statewide count in 2009 we estimated 30,196 (95% CI = 22,745–37,647) harbor seals in California.
format Article in Journal/Newspaper
author Harvey, James T.
Goley, Dawn
author_facet Harvey, James T.
Goley, Dawn
author_sort Harvey, James T.
title Determining a correction factor for aerial surveys of harbor seals in California
title_short Determining a correction factor for aerial surveys of harbor seals in California
title_full Determining a correction factor for aerial surveys of harbor seals in California
title_fullStr Determining a correction factor for aerial surveys of harbor seals in California
title_full_unstemmed Determining a correction factor for aerial surveys of harbor seals in California
title_sort determining a correction factor for aerial surveys of harbor seals in california
publisher Wiley
publishDate 2011
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1748-7692.2010.00446.x
https://api.wiley.com/onlinelibrary/tdm/v1/articles/10.1111%2Fj.1748-7692.2010.00446.x
https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111/j.1748-7692.2010.00446.x
geographic Pacific
geographic_facet Pacific
genre Phoca vitulina
genre_facet Phoca vitulina
op_source Marine Mammal Science
volume 27, issue 4, page 719-735
ISSN 0824-0469 1748-7692
op_rights http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/termsAndConditions#vor
op_doi https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1748-7692.2010.00446.x
container_title Marine Mammal Science
container_volume 27
container_issue 4
container_start_page 719
op_container_end_page 735
_version_ 1784254229656895488