EFFECTS OF MEAL SIZE ON OTOLITH RECOVERY FROM FECAL SAMPLES OF GRAY AND HARBOR SEAL PUPS

A bstract Recovered otoliths from pinniped feces provide valuable information on diet composition and prey size. We studied the effect of meal size on otolith recovery from the feces of one harbor and eight gray seal pups. Each of 11 experiments comprised a half‐ration meal, a period of fecal collec...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Published in:Marine Mammal Science
Main Authors: Marcus, J., Bowen, W. Don, Eddington, J. D.
Format: Article in Journal/Newspaper
Language:English
Published: Wiley 1998
Subjects:
Online Access:http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1748-7692.1998.tb00763.x
https://api.wiley.com/onlinelibrary/tdm/v1/articles/10.1111%2Fj.1748-7692.1998.tb00763.x
https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111/j.1748-7692.1998.tb00763.x
id crwiley:10.1111/j.1748-7692.1998.tb00763.x
record_format openpolar
spelling crwiley:10.1111/j.1748-7692.1998.tb00763.x 2023-12-03T10:19:02+01:00 EFFECTS OF MEAL SIZE ON OTOLITH RECOVERY FROM FECAL SAMPLES OF GRAY AND HARBOR SEAL PUPS Marcus, J. Bowen, W. Don Eddington, J. D. 1998 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1748-7692.1998.tb00763.x https://api.wiley.com/onlinelibrary/tdm/v1/articles/10.1111%2Fj.1748-7692.1998.tb00763.x https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111/j.1748-7692.1998.tb00763.x en eng Wiley http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/termsAndConditions#vor Marine Mammal Science volume 14, issue 4, page 789-802 ISSN 0824-0469 1748-7692 Aquatic Science Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics journal-article 1998 crwiley https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1748-7692.1998.tb00763.x 2023-11-09T13:27:17Z A bstract Recovered otoliths from pinniped feces provide valuable information on diet composition and prey size. We studied the effect of meal size on otolith recovery from the feces of one harbor and eight gray seal pups. Each of 11 experiments comprised a half‐ration meal, a period of fecal collection, a 1.5‐or double‐ration meal again followed by a period of fecal collection. A significantly lower percentage of Atlantic herring otoliths were recovered from half‐ration meals (25%± 12.5% in the harbor seal, 8.6%± 6.9% in eight gray seals) than from 1.5‐ or double‐ration meals (62.5%± 3.1 % in the harbor seal, 32.8%± 23.5% in gray seals). Meal size also significantly affected the percentage of Atlantic cod otoliths recovered from gray seal feces (65.0%± 26.3% from half ration, 98.3%± 2.9% from 1.5 ration). For both size meals, recovered cod otoliths were more significantly eroded than herring otoliths. The development of correction factors to account for the effects of digestion will need to consider the distribution of meal sizes of free‐ranging pinnipeds. Article in Journal/Newspaper atlantic cod harbor seal Wiley Online Library (via Crossref) Marine Mammal Science 14 4 789 802
institution Open Polar
collection Wiley Online Library (via Crossref)
op_collection_id crwiley
language English
topic Aquatic Science
Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics
spellingShingle Aquatic Science
Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics
Marcus, J.
Bowen, W. Don
Eddington, J. D.
EFFECTS OF MEAL SIZE ON OTOLITH RECOVERY FROM FECAL SAMPLES OF GRAY AND HARBOR SEAL PUPS
topic_facet Aquatic Science
Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics
description A bstract Recovered otoliths from pinniped feces provide valuable information on diet composition and prey size. We studied the effect of meal size on otolith recovery from the feces of one harbor and eight gray seal pups. Each of 11 experiments comprised a half‐ration meal, a period of fecal collection, a 1.5‐or double‐ration meal again followed by a period of fecal collection. A significantly lower percentage of Atlantic herring otoliths were recovered from half‐ration meals (25%± 12.5% in the harbor seal, 8.6%± 6.9% in eight gray seals) than from 1.5‐ or double‐ration meals (62.5%± 3.1 % in the harbor seal, 32.8%± 23.5% in gray seals). Meal size also significantly affected the percentage of Atlantic cod otoliths recovered from gray seal feces (65.0%± 26.3% from half ration, 98.3%± 2.9% from 1.5 ration). For both size meals, recovered cod otoliths were more significantly eroded than herring otoliths. The development of correction factors to account for the effects of digestion will need to consider the distribution of meal sizes of free‐ranging pinnipeds.
format Article in Journal/Newspaper
author Marcus, J.
Bowen, W. Don
Eddington, J. D.
author_facet Marcus, J.
Bowen, W. Don
Eddington, J. D.
author_sort Marcus, J.
title EFFECTS OF MEAL SIZE ON OTOLITH RECOVERY FROM FECAL SAMPLES OF GRAY AND HARBOR SEAL PUPS
title_short EFFECTS OF MEAL SIZE ON OTOLITH RECOVERY FROM FECAL SAMPLES OF GRAY AND HARBOR SEAL PUPS
title_full EFFECTS OF MEAL SIZE ON OTOLITH RECOVERY FROM FECAL SAMPLES OF GRAY AND HARBOR SEAL PUPS
title_fullStr EFFECTS OF MEAL SIZE ON OTOLITH RECOVERY FROM FECAL SAMPLES OF GRAY AND HARBOR SEAL PUPS
title_full_unstemmed EFFECTS OF MEAL SIZE ON OTOLITH RECOVERY FROM FECAL SAMPLES OF GRAY AND HARBOR SEAL PUPS
title_sort effects of meal size on otolith recovery from fecal samples of gray and harbor seal pups
publisher Wiley
publishDate 1998
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1748-7692.1998.tb00763.x
https://api.wiley.com/onlinelibrary/tdm/v1/articles/10.1111%2Fj.1748-7692.1998.tb00763.x
https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111/j.1748-7692.1998.tb00763.x
genre atlantic cod
harbor seal
genre_facet atlantic cod
harbor seal
op_source Marine Mammal Science
volume 14, issue 4, page 789-802
ISSN 0824-0469 1748-7692
op_rights http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/termsAndConditions#vor
op_doi https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1748-7692.1998.tb00763.x
container_title Marine Mammal Science
container_volume 14
container_issue 4
container_start_page 789
op_container_end_page 802
_version_ 1784266166707945472