Observer Variation in Histologic Classification of Thyroid Cancer

• Published in: Acta Pathologica Microbiologica Scandinavica Section A Pathology
• Main Authors: Saxén, E., Franssila, K., Bjarnason, O., Normann, T., Ringertz, N.
• Format: Article in Journal/Newspaper
• Language: English
• Published: Wiley 1978
• Subjects: General Medicine; Norway; Iceland
• Online Access: http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1699-0463.1978.tb02073.x; https://api.wiley.com/onlinelibrary/tdm/v1/articles/10.1111%2Fj.1699-0463.1978.tb02073.x; https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111/j.1699-0463.1978.tb02073.x

Histologic slides of 696 cases of thyroid cancer reported to the national cancer registries of Finland, Iceland, Norway and Sweden were reviewed by 5 Nordic pathologists in order to determine the observer variation between the pathologists, as well as the reproducibility of the WHO classification of thyroid tumours. In 58% of the cases all observers agreed upon the diagnosis and in 82% at least three of them agreed. The observer disagreement was lowest for papillary carcinoma (7%) and highest for follicular carcinoma (27%). The corresponding figures for anaplastic and medullary carcinomas were 18% and 23%, respectively. The most common diverging diagnosis for cases finally interpreted as papillary carcinoma was follicular carcinoma, and for cases finally interpreted as follicular carcinoma, a benign thyroid lesion. The results of the present study clearly indicate the necessity of having all cases reviewed by the same pathologist or group of pathologists in order to obtain reliable results for comparative studies.