Positive interactions between the lichen Usnea antarctica ( Parmeliaceae) and the native flora in Maritime Antarctica

Abstract Questions Is the macrolichen U snea antarctica a ‘nurse’ species to A ntarctic flora? Are positive plant–plant interactions more frequent than negative interactions in Antarctic ecosystems? Are microclimatic modifications by cushions of U . antarctica responsible for the nurse effect? Locat...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Published in:Journal of Vegetation Science
Main Authors: Molina‐Montenegro, Marco A., Ricote‐Martínez, Natalia, Muñoz‐Ramírez, Carlos, Gómez‐González, Susana, Torres‐Díaz, Cristian, Salgado‐Luarte, Cristian, Gianoli, Ernesto
Other Authors: Woods, Kerry
Format: Article in Journal/Newspaper
Language:English
Published: Wiley 2012
Subjects:
Online Access:http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1654-1103.2012.01480.x
https://api.wiley.com/onlinelibrary/tdm/v1/articles/10.1111%2Fj.1654-1103.2012.01480.x
https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111/j.1654-1103.2012.01480.x
id crwiley:10.1111/j.1654-1103.2012.01480.x
record_format openpolar
spelling crwiley:10.1111/j.1654-1103.2012.01480.x 2024-09-09T19:10:54+00:00 Positive interactions between the lichen Usnea antarctica ( Parmeliaceae) and the native flora in Maritime Antarctica Molina‐Montenegro, Marco A. Ricote‐Martínez, Natalia Muñoz‐Ramírez, Carlos Gómez‐González, Susana Torres‐Díaz, Cristian Salgado‐Luarte, Cristian Gianoli, Ernesto Woods, Kerry 2012 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1654-1103.2012.01480.x https://api.wiley.com/onlinelibrary/tdm/v1/articles/10.1111%2Fj.1654-1103.2012.01480.x https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111/j.1654-1103.2012.01480.x en eng Wiley http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/termsAndConditions#vor Journal of Vegetation Science volume 24, issue 3, page 463-472 ISSN 1100-9233 1654-1103 journal-article 2012 crwiley https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1654-1103.2012.01480.x 2024-08-13T04:17:18Z Abstract Questions Is the macrolichen U snea antarctica a ‘nurse’ species to A ntarctic flora? Are positive plant–plant interactions more frequent than negative interactions in Antarctic ecosystems? Are microclimatic modifications by cushions of U . antarctica responsible for the nurse effect? Location Two sites in A ntarctica: K ing G eorge I sland, S outh S hetland (62°11′ S, 58°56′ W; 62°11′ S, 58°59′ W). Methods We evaluated the association of plant species with U . antarctica cushions by recording species growing – in equivalent areas – within and outside U . antarctica cushions. Additionally, we performed transplant experiments with D eschampsia antarctica individuals to assess if U . antarctica cushions enhance plant survival. In both study sites we monitored temperature, moisture and nutrient status of soil outside and within the cushions to provide insights into potential mechanisms underlying possible interactions between U . antarctica and other plant species. Results Eight out of 13 species were positively associated with cushions of the widespread lichen U . antarctica , while only one species ( U . aurantiaco‐atra ) showed a negative association with U . antarctica . Survival of D eschampsia was enhanced when growing associated with U . antarctica cushions. Our results indicate that cushions ameliorated the extreme conditions of Antarctic islands through increased temperature and soil moisture, decreased radiation and evaporative water loss and increased nutrient availability. Conclusions The nurse effect of U . antarctica is verified. Cushions of this macrolichen may be a key component in structuring the A ntarctic landscape and maintaining local species richness, and their presence might influence range expansion of other species. Article in Journal/Newspaper Antarc* Antarctic Antarctica Usnea antarctica Wiley Online Library Antarctic Journal of Vegetation Science 24 3 463 472
institution Open Polar
collection Wiley Online Library
op_collection_id crwiley
language English
description Abstract Questions Is the macrolichen U snea antarctica a ‘nurse’ species to A ntarctic flora? Are positive plant–plant interactions more frequent than negative interactions in Antarctic ecosystems? Are microclimatic modifications by cushions of U . antarctica responsible for the nurse effect? Location Two sites in A ntarctica: K ing G eorge I sland, S outh S hetland (62°11′ S, 58°56′ W; 62°11′ S, 58°59′ W). Methods We evaluated the association of plant species with U . antarctica cushions by recording species growing – in equivalent areas – within and outside U . antarctica cushions. Additionally, we performed transplant experiments with D eschampsia antarctica individuals to assess if U . antarctica cushions enhance plant survival. In both study sites we monitored temperature, moisture and nutrient status of soil outside and within the cushions to provide insights into potential mechanisms underlying possible interactions between U . antarctica and other plant species. Results Eight out of 13 species were positively associated with cushions of the widespread lichen U . antarctica , while only one species ( U . aurantiaco‐atra ) showed a negative association with U . antarctica . Survival of D eschampsia was enhanced when growing associated with U . antarctica cushions. Our results indicate that cushions ameliorated the extreme conditions of Antarctic islands through increased temperature and soil moisture, decreased radiation and evaporative water loss and increased nutrient availability. Conclusions The nurse effect of U . antarctica is verified. Cushions of this macrolichen may be a key component in structuring the A ntarctic landscape and maintaining local species richness, and their presence might influence range expansion of other species.
author2 Woods, Kerry
format Article in Journal/Newspaper
author Molina‐Montenegro, Marco A.
Ricote‐Martínez, Natalia
Muñoz‐Ramírez, Carlos
Gómez‐González, Susana
Torres‐Díaz, Cristian
Salgado‐Luarte, Cristian
Gianoli, Ernesto
spellingShingle Molina‐Montenegro, Marco A.
Ricote‐Martínez, Natalia
Muñoz‐Ramírez, Carlos
Gómez‐González, Susana
Torres‐Díaz, Cristian
Salgado‐Luarte, Cristian
Gianoli, Ernesto
Positive interactions between the lichen Usnea antarctica ( Parmeliaceae) and the native flora in Maritime Antarctica
author_facet Molina‐Montenegro, Marco A.
Ricote‐Martínez, Natalia
Muñoz‐Ramírez, Carlos
Gómez‐González, Susana
Torres‐Díaz, Cristian
Salgado‐Luarte, Cristian
Gianoli, Ernesto
author_sort Molina‐Montenegro, Marco A.
title Positive interactions between the lichen Usnea antarctica ( Parmeliaceae) and the native flora in Maritime Antarctica
title_short Positive interactions between the lichen Usnea antarctica ( Parmeliaceae) and the native flora in Maritime Antarctica
title_full Positive interactions between the lichen Usnea antarctica ( Parmeliaceae) and the native flora in Maritime Antarctica
title_fullStr Positive interactions between the lichen Usnea antarctica ( Parmeliaceae) and the native flora in Maritime Antarctica
title_full_unstemmed Positive interactions between the lichen Usnea antarctica ( Parmeliaceae) and the native flora in Maritime Antarctica
title_sort positive interactions between the lichen usnea antarctica ( parmeliaceae) and the native flora in maritime antarctica
publisher Wiley
publishDate 2012
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1654-1103.2012.01480.x
https://api.wiley.com/onlinelibrary/tdm/v1/articles/10.1111%2Fj.1654-1103.2012.01480.x
https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111/j.1654-1103.2012.01480.x
geographic Antarctic
geographic_facet Antarctic
genre Antarc*
Antarctic
Antarctica
Usnea antarctica
genre_facet Antarc*
Antarctic
Antarctica
Usnea antarctica
op_source Journal of Vegetation Science
volume 24, issue 3, page 463-472
ISSN 1100-9233 1654-1103
op_rights http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/termsAndConditions#vor
op_doi https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1654-1103.2012.01480.x
container_title Journal of Vegetation Science
container_volume 24
container_issue 3
container_start_page 463
op_container_end_page 472
_version_ 1809826555918024704