The shell or the kernel: biodiversity estimates of benthic foraminifera
Estimates of protist biodiversity and distribution have until recently relied on the morphological identification of individual cells. The advent of environmental‐DNA‐based surveys of these protist communities has broadened our understanding of species richness and diversity. A “total‐evidence biodi...
Published in: | Journal of Eukaryotic Microbiology |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , |
Format: | Article in Journal/Newspaper |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Wiley
2005
|
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1550-7408.2005.05202003_1_31.x https://api.wiley.com/onlinelibrary/tdm/v1/articles/10.1111%2Fj.1550-7408.2005.05202003_1_31.x https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111/j.1550-7408.2005.05202003_1_31.x |
id |
crwiley:10.1111/j.1550-7408.2005.05202003_1_31.x |
---|---|
record_format |
openpolar |
spelling |
crwiley:10.1111/j.1550-7408.2005.05202003_1_31.x 2024-06-02T07:57:26+00:00 The shell or the kernel: biodiversity estimates of benthic foraminifera HABURA, ANDREA HANES, STEVEN D. ALEXANDER, STEPHEN P. BOWSER, SAMUEL S. 2005 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1550-7408.2005.05202003_1_31.x https://api.wiley.com/onlinelibrary/tdm/v1/articles/10.1111%2Fj.1550-7408.2005.05202003_1_31.x https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111/j.1550-7408.2005.05202003_1_31.x en eng Wiley http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/termsAndConditions#vor Journal of Eukaryotic Microbiology volume 52, issue 2 ISSN 1066-5234 1550-7408 journal-article 2005 crwiley https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1550-7408.2005.05202003_1_31.x 2024-05-03T12:04:54Z Estimates of protist biodiversity and distribution have until recently relied on the morphological identification of individual cells. The advent of environmental‐DNA‐based surveys of these protist communities has broadened our understanding of species richness and diversity. A “total‐evidence biodiversity” approach gives two benefits. First, it allows “back‐comparison” to previous studies of ecosystems, permitting estimates of the amount of cryptic diversity in different sampling regimes (and by extension, the fossil record). Second, it will provide the best possible estimate of the total species richness of current study sites. Here, we use a well‐studied benthic protist community, the foraminiferal assemblage of McMurdo Sound, Antarctica, to determine the effective parameters of both detection methods. We find that molecular‐based techniques detect well‐characterized calcareous species at depths too great to allow calcification, suggesting that these forms may be able to survive without their distinctive tests. “Fragile” taxa also appear to be better represented in molecular surveys than in morphological ones. The strengths of a combined morphological–molecular approach are demonstrated by an assessment of the distribution of two species in the genus Notodendrodes; morphological detection excels in the identification of distinctive, patchily distributed adults, whereas molecular detection with taxon‐specific probes enabled identification in less favorable sampling conditions. Such a “broad‐plus‐deep” approach appears to maximize detection efficiency in this Antarctic setting. Work supported by NSF OPP0003639. Article in Journal/Newspaper Antarc* Antarctic Antarctica McMurdo Sound Wiley Online Library Antarctic McMurdo Sound Journal of Eukaryotic Microbiology 52 2 |
institution |
Open Polar |
collection |
Wiley Online Library |
op_collection_id |
crwiley |
language |
English |
description |
Estimates of protist biodiversity and distribution have until recently relied on the morphological identification of individual cells. The advent of environmental‐DNA‐based surveys of these protist communities has broadened our understanding of species richness and diversity. A “total‐evidence biodiversity” approach gives two benefits. First, it allows “back‐comparison” to previous studies of ecosystems, permitting estimates of the amount of cryptic diversity in different sampling regimes (and by extension, the fossil record). Second, it will provide the best possible estimate of the total species richness of current study sites. Here, we use a well‐studied benthic protist community, the foraminiferal assemblage of McMurdo Sound, Antarctica, to determine the effective parameters of both detection methods. We find that molecular‐based techniques detect well‐characterized calcareous species at depths too great to allow calcification, suggesting that these forms may be able to survive without their distinctive tests. “Fragile” taxa also appear to be better represented in molecular surveys than in morphological ones. The strengths of a combined morphological–molecular approach are demonstrated by an assessment of the distribution of two species in the genus Notodendrodes; morphological detection excels in the identification of distinctive, patchily distributed adults, whereas molecular detection with taxon‐specific probes enabled identification in less favorable sampling conditions. Such a “broad‐plus‐deep” approach appears to maximize detection efficiency in this Antarctic setting. Work supported by NSF OPP0003639. |
format |
Article in Journal/Newspaper |
author |
HABURA, ANDREA HANES, STEVEN D. ALEXANDER, STEPHEN P. BOWSER, SAMUEL S. |
spellingShingle |
HABURA, ANDREA HANES, STEVEN D. ALEXANDER, STEPHEN P. BOWSER, SAMUEL S. The shell or the kernel: biodiversity estimates of benthic foraminifera |
author_facet |
HABURA, ANDREA HANES, STEVEN D. ALEXANDER, STEPHEN P. BOWSER, SAMUEL S. |
author_sort |
HABURA, ANDREA |
title |
The shell or the kernel: biodiversity estimates of benthic foraminifera |
title_short |
The shell or the kernel: biodiversity estimates of benthic foraminifera |
title_full |
The shell or the kernel: biodiversity estimates of benthic foraminifera |
title_fullStr |
The shell or the kernel: biodiversity estimates of benthic foraminifera |
title_full_unstemmed |
The shell or the kernel: biodiversity estimates of benthic foraminifera |
title_sort |
shell or the kernel: biodiversity estimates of benthic foraminifera |
publisher |
Wiley |
publishDate |
2005 |
url |
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1550-7408.2005.05202003_1_31.x https://api.wiley.com/onlinelibrary/tdm/v1/articles/10.1111%2Fj.1550-7408.2005.05202003_1_31.x https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111/j.1550-7408.2005.05202003_1_31.x |
geographic |
Antarctic McMurdo Sound |
geographic_facet |
Antarctic McMurdo Sound |
genre |
Antarc* Antarctic Antarctica McMurdo Sound |
genre_facet |
Antarc* Antarctic Antarctica McMurdo Sound |
op_source |
Journal of Eukaryotic Microbiology volume 52, issue 2 ISSN 1066-5234 1550-7408 |
op_rights |
http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/termsAndConditions#vor |
op_doi |
https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1550-7408.2005.05202003_1_31.x |
container_title |
Journal of Eukaryotic Microbiology |
container_volume |
52 |
container_issue |
2 |
_version_ |
1800740599633018880 |