The shell or the kernel: biodiversity estimates of benthic foraminifera

Estimates of protist biodiversity and distribution have until recently relied on the morphological identification of individual cells. The advent of environmental‐DNA‐based surveys of these protist communities has broadened our understanding of species richness and diversity. A “total‐evidence biodi...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Published in:Journal of Eukaryotic Microbiology
Main Authors: HABURA, ANDREA, HANES, STEVEN D., ALEXANDER, STEPHEN P., BOWSER, SAMUEL S.
Format: Article in Journal/Newspaper
Language:English
Published: Wiley 2005
Subjects:
Online Access:http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1550-7408.2005.05202003_1_31.x
https://api.wiley.com/onlinelibrary/tdm/v1/articles/10.1111%2Fj.1550-7408.2005.05202003_1_31.x
https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111/j.1550-7408.2005.05202003_1_31.x
id crwiley:10.1111/j.1550-7408.2005.05202003_1_31.x
record_format openpolar
spelling crwiley:10.1111/j.1550-7408.2005.05202003_1_31.x 2024-06-02T07:57:26+00:00 The shell or the kernel: biodiversity estimates of benthic foraminifera HABURA, ANDREA HANES, STEVEN D. ALEXANDER, STEPHEN P. BOWSER, SAMUEL S. 2005 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1550-7408.2005.05202003_1_31.x https://api.wiley.com/onlinelibrary/tdm/v1/articles/10.1111%2Fj.1550-7408.2005.05202003_1_31.x https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111/j.1550-7408.2005.05202003_1_31.x en eng Wiley http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/termsAndConditions#vor Journal of Eukaryotic Microbiology volume 52, issue 2 ISSN 1066-5234 1550-7408 journal-article 2005 crwiley https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1550-7408.2005.05202003_1_31.x 2024-05-03T12:04:54Z Estimates of protist biodiversity and distribution have until recently relied on the morphological identification of individual cells. The advent of environmental‐DNA‐based surveys of these protist communities has broadened our understanding of species richness and diversity. A “total‐evidence biodiversity” approach gives two benefits. First, it allows “back‐comparison” to previous studies of ecosystems, permitting estimates of the amount of cryptic diversity in different sampling regimes (and by extension, the fossil record). Second, it will provide the best possible estimate of the total species richness of current study sites. Here, we use a well‐studied benthic protist community, the foraminiferal assemblage of McMurdo Sound, Antarctica, to determine the effective parameters of both detection methods. We find that molecular‐based techniques detect well‐characterized calcareous species at depths too great to allow calcification, suggesting that these forms may be able to survive without their distinctive tests. “Fragile” taxa also appear to be better represented in molecular surveys than in morphological ones. The strengths of a combined morphological–molecular approach are demonstrated by an assessment of the distribution of two species in the genus Notodendrodes; morphological detection excels in the identification of distinctive, patchily distributed adults, whereas molecular detection with taxon‐specific probes enabled identification in less favorable sampling conditions. Such a “broad‐plus‐deep” approach appears to maximize detection efficiency in this Antarctic setting. Work supported by NSF OPP0003639. Article in Journal/Newspaper Antarc* Antarctic Antarctica McMurdo Sound Wiley Online Library Antarctic McMurdo Sound Journal of Eukaryotic Microbiology 52 2
institution Open Polar
collection Wiley Online Library
op_collection_id crwiley
language English
description Estimates of protist biodiversity and distribution have until recently relied on the morphological identification of individual cells. The advent of environmental‐DNA‐based surveys of these protist communities has broadened our understanding of species richness and diversity. A “total‐evidence biodiversity” approach gives two benefits. First, it allows “back‐comparison” to previous studies of ecosystems, permitting estimates of the amount of cryptic diversity in different sampling regimes (and by extension, the fossil record). Second, it will provide the best possible estimate of the total species richness of current study sites. Here, we use a well‐studied benthic protist community, the foraminiferal assemblage of McMurdo Sound, Antarctica, to determine the effective parameters of both detection methods. We find that molecular‐based techniques detect well‐characterized calcareous species at depths too great to allow calcification, suggesting that these forms may be able to survive without their distinctive tests. “Fragile” taxa also appear to be better represented in molecular surveys than in morphological ones. The strengths of a combined morphological–molecular approach are demonstrated by an assessment of the distribution of two species in the genus Notodendrodes; morphological detection excels in the identification of distinctive, patchily distributed adults, whereas molecular detection with taxon‐specific probes enabled identification in less favorable sampling conditions. Such a “broad‐plus‐deep” approach appears to maximize detection efficiency in this Antarctic setting. Work supported by NSF OPP0003639.
format Article in Journal/Newspaper
author HABURA, ANDREA
HANES, STEVEN D.
ALEXANDER, STEPHEN P.
BOWSER, SAMUEL S.
spellingShingle HABURA, ANDREA
HANES, STEVEN D.
ALEXANDER, STEPHEN P.
BOWSER, SAMUEL S.
The shell or the kernel: biodiversity estimates of benthic foraminifera
author_facet HABURA, ANDREA
HANES, STEVEN D.
ALEXANDER, STEPHEN P.
BOWSER, SAMUEL S.
author_sort HABURA, ANDREA
title The shell or the kernel: biodiversity estimates of benthic foraminifera
title_short The shell or the kernel: biodiversity estimates of benthic foraminifera
title_full The shell or the kernel: biodiversity estimates of benthic foraminifera
title_fullStr The shell or the kernel: biodiversity estimates of benthic foraminifera
title_full_unstemmed The shell or the kernel: biodiversity estimates of benthic foraminifera
title_sort shell or the kernel: biodiversity estimates of benthic foraminifera
publisher Wiley
publishDate 2005
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1550-7408.2005.05202003_1_31.x
https://api.wiley.com/onlinelibrary/tdm/v1/articles/10.1111%2Fj.1550-7408.2005.05202003_1_31.x
https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111/j.1550-7408.2005.05202003_1_31.x
geographic Antarctic
McMurdo Sound
geographic_facet Antarctic
McMurdo Sound
genre Antarc*
Antarctic
Antarctica
McMurdo Sound
genre_facet Antarc*
Antarctic
Antarctica
McMurdo Sound
op_source Journal of Eukaryotic Microbiology
volume 52, issue 2
ISSN 1066-5234 1550-7408
op_rights http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/termsAndConditions#vor
op_doi https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1550-7408.2005.05202003_1_31.x
container_title Journal of Eukaryotic Microbiology
container_volume 52
container_issue 2
_version_ 1800740599633018880