STRATEGIES AND KINETICS OF PHOTOACCLIMATION IN THREE ANTARCTIC NANOPHYTOFLAGELLATES 1

• Published in: Journal of Phycology
• Main Authors: Buma, Anita G. J., Noordeloos, Anja A. M., Larsen, Jacob
• Format: Article in Journal/Newspaper
• Language: English
• Published: Wiley 1993
• Subjects: Antarctic; Antarc*
• Online Access: http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1529-8817.1993.tb00141.x; https://api.wiley.com/onlinelibrary/tdm/v1/articles/10.1111%2Fj.1529-8817.1993.tb00141.x; https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111/j.1529-8817.1993.tb00141.x

ABSTRACT Three Antarctic nanophytoflagellates (two cryptophyte species and a Pyramimonas sp.) were compared for their capacity to phiotoacclimate and for their kinetic responses in changing photic environments. Division rate, cell size cellular fluorescence, and chlorophyll a content were measured steady and transient states of semi‐continuous cultures maintain at 1.0° C. Of all parameters tested, cell size was most affected by irradiance. Acclimation kinetics were modeled using a first‐order equation. Rates of change in cell size following shifts in irradiance were comparable with rates of change in chemical composition reported for temperate algae. Response rates of cellular in vivo red and orange fluorescence were lower. In many cases, however, responses could not be described by the first‐order kinetic model. Division rates remained high for approximately 3 days following a shift down in irradiance, after which new division rates were established. The nanoflagellates studied here appear to respond to small irradiance perturbations at low rates. However, they may fail to adapt and abrupt changes in photon flux density (PFD). When shade‐adapted (25 μmol, m −2 , m −2 , s −1 ) cells were exposed to high PFD (400 μmol, m −2 , s −1 ) for 1–3 days, cell were incapable of readapting division rate and pigment content to the initial irradiance condition (25 μmol, m −2 , s −1 ) for about 1 month following the shift‐down step. The ecological role of the kinetics of photoacclimation in nanophytoflagellate growth performance in Antarctic ecosystems is discussed.