Old vs recent cross‐border cooperation: Portugal–Spain and Norway–Sweden

The two largest European Peninsulas (Iberian and Scandinavian) are both divided by a long and ancient frontier, which separates four old European nations: Portugal, Spain, Sweden and Norway. In the first case, the unusual stability of the border, which remains almost unchanged for more than 800 year...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Published in:Area
Main Author: Medeiros, Eduardo José Rocha
Format: Article in Journal/Newspaper
Language:English
Published: Wiley 2010
Subjects:
Online Access:http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-4762.2010.00940.x
https://api.wiley.com/onlinelibrary/tdm/v1/articles/10.1111%2Fj.1475-4762.2010.00940.x
https://rgs-ibg.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111/j.1475-4762.2010.00940.x
id crwiley:10.1111/j.1475-4762.2010.00940.x
record_format openpolar
spelling crwiley:10.1111/j.1475-4762.2010.00940.x 2024-09-30T14:37:27+00:00 Old vs recent cross‐border cooperation: Portugal–Spain and Norway–Sweden Medeiros, Eduardo José Rocha 2010 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-4762.2010.00940.x https://api.wiley.com/onlinelibrary/tdm/v1/articles/10.1111%2Fj.1475-4762.2010.00940.x https://rgs-ibg.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111/j.1475-4762.2010.00940.x en eng Wiley http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/termsAndConditions#vor Area volume 42, issue 4, page 434-443 ISSN 0004-0894 1475-4762 journal-article 2010 crwiley https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-4762.2010.00940.x 2024-09-19T04:19:57Z The two largest European Peninsulas (Iberian and Scandinavian) are both divided by a long and ancient frontier, which separates four old European nations: Portugal, Spain, Sweden and Norway. In the first case, the unusual stability of the border, which remains almost unchanged for more than 800 years, has contributed to strengthen a long ‘back‐to‐back’ existence, during most of this time. In the latter, however, successive changes in the border location, and historical alliances between the Nordic countries, created a more ‘face‐to‐face’ type of border and a more solid background for the cross‐border cooperation (CBC). Therefore, while the INTERREG‐A Community Initiative represented an important starting point for the CBC process in most parts of the Portuguese–Spanish border region (PSBR), it was just another important added value for the CBC in the Swedish–Norwegian border region (SNBR), since this process had already started in 1948, when Sweden, Norway, Iceland and Denmark established the joint Nordic Committee for Economic Cooperation, followed by the formation of the Nordic Council in 1951. With this in mind, this article analyses how such distinct CBC backgrounds contributed to the two different approaches and results obtained from the implementation of the INTERREG‐A in both studied border regions. Article in Journal/Newspaper Iceland Wiley Online Library Norway Area 42 4 434 443
institution Open Polar
collection Wiley Online Library
op_collection_id crwiley
language English
description The two largest European Peninsulas (Iberian and Scandinavian) are both divided by a long and ancient frontier, which separates four old European nations: Portugal, Spain, Sweden and Norway. In the first case, the unusual stability of the border, which remains almost unchanged for more than 800 years, has contributed to strengthen a long ‘back‐to‐back’ existence, during most of this time. In the latter, however, successive changes in the border location, and historical alliances between the Nordic countries, created a more ‘face‐to‐face’ type of border and a more solid background for the cross‐border cooperation (CBC). Therefore, while the INTERREG‐A Community Initiative represented an important starting point for the CBC process in most parts of the Portuguese–Spanish border region (PSBR), it was just another important added value for the CBC in the Swedish–Norwegian border region (SNBR), since this process had already started in 1948, when Sweden, Norway, Iceland and Denmark established the joint Nordic Committee for Economic Cooperation, followed by the formation of the Nordic Council in 1951. With this in mind, this article analyses how such distinct CBC backgrounds contributed to the two different approaches and results obtained from the implementation of the INTERREG‐A in both studied border regions.
format Article in Journal/Newspaper
author Medeiros, Eduardo José Rocha
spellingShingle Medeiros, Eduardo José Rocha
Old vs recent cross‐border cooperation: Portugal–Spain and Norway–Sweden
author_facet Medeiros, Eduardo José Rocha
author_sort Medeiros, Eduardo José Rocha
title Old vs recent cross‐border cooperation: Portugal–Spain and Norway–Sweden
title_short Old vs recent cross‐border cooperation: Portugal–Spain and Norway–Sweden
title_full Old vs recent cross‐border cooperation: Portugal–Spain and Norway–Sweden
title_fullStr Old vs recent cross‐border cooperation: Portugal–Spain and Norway–Sweden
title_full_unstemmed Old vs recent cross‐border cooperation: Portugal–Spain and Norway–Sweden
title_sort old vs recent cross‐border cooperation: portugal–spain and norway–sweden
publisher Wiley
publishDate 2010
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-4762.2010.00940.x
https://api.wiley.com/onlinelibrary/tdm/v1/articles/10.1111%2Fj.1475-4762.2010.00940.x
https://rgs-ibg.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111/j.1475-4762.2010.00940.x
geographic Norway
geographic_facet Norway
genre Iceland
genre_facet Iceland
op_source Area
volume 42, issue 4, page 434-443
ISSN 0004-0894 1475-4762
op_rights http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/termsAndConditions#vor
op_doi https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-4762.2010.00940.x
container_title Area
container_volume 42
container_issue 4
container_start_page 434
op_container_end_page 443
_version_ 1811640298075324416