Managed realignment in the UK – the first 5 years of colonization by birds

With current losses of saltmarsh running at > 100 ha per year in the UK, creation of new intertidal habitats through managed realignment is likely to be increasingly used. Potentially, this has biodiversity as well as engineering benefits. However, assessing the conservation value of many of the...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Published in:Ibis
Main Authors: Atkinson, Philip W., Crooks, Steve, Drewitt, Allan, Grant, Alastair, Rehfisch, Mark M., Sharpe, John, Tyas, Christopher J.
Format: Article in Journal/Newspaper
Language:English
Published: Wiley 2004
Subjects:
Online Access:http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1474-919x.2004.00334.x
https://api.wiley.com/onlinelibrary/tdm/v1/articles/10.1111%2Fj.1474-919X.2004.00334.x
https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111/j.1474-919X.2004.00334.x
id crwiley:10.1111/j.1474-919x.2004.00334.x
record_format openpolar
spelling crwiley:10.1111/j.1474-919x.2004.00334.x 2024-06-02T08:04:45+00:00 Managed realignment in the UK – the first 5 years of colonization by birds Atkinson, Philip W. Crooks, Steve Drewitt, Allan Grant, Alastair Rehfisch, Mark M. Sharpe, John Tyas, Christopher J. 2004 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1474-919x.2004.00334.x https://api.wiley.com/onlinelibrary/tdm/v1/articles/10.1111%2Fj.1474-919X.2004.00334.x https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111/j.1474-919X.2004.00334.x en eng Wiley http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/termsAndConditions#vor Ibis volume 146, issue s1, page 101-110 ISSN 0019-1019 1474-919X journal-article 2004 crwiley https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1474-919x.2004.00334.x 2024-05-03T11:01:25Z With current losses of saltmarsh running at > 100 ha per year in the UK, creation of new intertidal habitats through managed realignment is likely to be increasingly used. Potentially, this has biodiversity as well as engineering benefits. However, assessing the conservation value of many of the current UK schemes is difficult as the biological monitoring has been generally poor, with a few notable exceptions. At the Tollesbury and Orplands realignment sites, Essex, bird communities were dominated by terrestrial species during the first year of inundation and waterbird communities rapidly developed during the second and third years. Five years after the initial breach in the sea wall, communities were similar to surrounding mudflats but with some notable exceptions. Dunlin Calidris alpina and Common Redshank Tringa totanus that prey on the early colonizing Nereis and Hydrobia used the sites in the first 2 years. Eurasian Oystercatcher Haematopus ostralegus did not occur on the realignment site as there were no large bivalves, whereas Red Knot Calidris canutus used the site after 4–5 years coincidentally with the appearance of Macoma balthica . The differences in the bird communities occurred because UK sites are often small, enclosed and poorly drained. If at a suitable height in the tidal frame, UK managed realignment sites are successful in that they have developed saltmarsh and biologically active mudflats but they may lack the full range of biodiversity found in surrounding natural intertidal habitats, even decades after inundation. Article in Journal/Newspaper Calidris alpina Calidris canutus Dunlin Red Knot Wiley Online Library Ibis 146 s1 101 110
institution Open Polar
collection Wiley Online Library
op_collection_id crwiley
language English
description With current losses of saltmarsh running at > 100 ha per year in the UK, creation of new intertidal habitats through managed realignment is likely to be increasingly used. Potentially, this has biodiversity as well as engineering benefits. However, assessing the conservation value of many of the current UK schemes is difficult as the biological monitoring has been generally poor, with a few notable exceptions. At the Tollesbury and Orplands realignment sites, Essex, bird communities were dominated by terrestrial species during the first year of inundation and waterbird communities rapidly developed during the second and third years. Five years after the initial breach in the sea wall, communities were similar to surrounding mudflats but with some notable exceptions. Dunlin Calidris alpina and Common Redshank Tringa totanus that prey on the early colonizing Nereis and Hydrobia used the sites in the first 2 years. Eurasian Oystercatcher Haematopus ostralegus did not occur on the realignment site as there were no large bivalves, whereas Red Knot Calidris canutus used the site after 4–5 years coincidentally with the appearance of Macoma balthica . The differences in the bird communities occurred because UK sites are often small, enclosed and poorly drained. If at a suitable height in the tidal frame, UK managed realignment sites are successful in that they have developed saltmarsh and biologically active mudflats but they may lack the full range of biodiversity found in surrounding natural intertidal habitats, even decades after inundation.
format Article in Journal/Newspaper
author Atkinson, Philip W.
Crooks, Steve
Drewitt, Allan
Grant, Alastair
Rehfisch, Mark M.
Sharpe, John
Tyas, Christopher J.
spellingShingle Atkinson, Philip W.
Crooks, Steve
Drewitt, Allan
Grant, Alastair
Rehfisch, Mark M.
Sharpe, John
Tyas, Christopher J.
Managed realignment in the UK – the first 5 years of colonization by birds
author_facet Atkinson, Philip W.
Crooks, Steve
Drewitt, Allan
Grant, Alastair
Rehfisch, Mark M.
Sharpe, John
Tyas, Christopher J.
author_sort Atkinson, Philip W.
title Managed realignment in the UK – the first 5 years of colonization by birds
title_short Managed realignment in the UK – the first 5 years of colonization by birds
title_full Managed realignment in the UK – the first 5 years of colonization by birds
title_fullStr Managed realignment in the UK – the first 5 years of colonization by birds
title_full_unstemmed Managed realignment in the UK – the first 5 years of colonization by birds
title_sort managed realignment in the uk – the first 5 years of colonization by birds
publisher Wiley
publishDate 2004
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1474-919x.2004.00334.x
https://api.wiley.com/onlinelibrary/tdm/v1/articles/10.1111%2Fj.1474-919X.2004.00334.x
https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111/j.1474-919X.2004.00334.x
genre Calidris alpina
Calidris canutus
Dunlin
Red Knot
genre_facet Calidris alpina
Calidris canutus
Dunlin
Red Knot
op_source Ibis
volume 146, issue s1, page 101-110
ISSN 0019-1019 1474-919X
op_rights http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/termsAndConditions#vor
op_doi https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1474-919x.2004.00334.x
container_title Ibis
container_volume 146
container_issue s1
container_start_page 101
op_container_end_page 110
_version_ 1800749404522545152