Identifying predators at nests of small birds in a New Zealand forest

• Published in: Ibis
• Main Authors: BROWN, K. P., MOLLER, H., INNES, J., JANSEN, P.
• Format: Article in Journal/Newspaper
• Language: English
• Published: Wiley 1998
• Subjects: New Zealand; Rattus rattus
• Online Access: http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1474-919x.1998.tb04389.x; https://api.wiley.com/onlinelibrary/tdm/v1/articles/10.1111%2Fj.1474-919X.1998.tb04389.x; https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111/j.1474-919X.1998.tb04389.x

Time‐lapse video equipment was used to film continuously at nests of two small passerines, the New Zealand Robin Petroica australis and the Tomtit Petroica macrocephala , in an indigenous broadleaf/hardwood forest in central North Island, New Zealand. The nests were illuminated with infrared light to allow night‐time observations of predator and parent bird behaviour, and signs left at nests were linked to predator identity. Introduced Ship Rats Rattus rattus and the small native owl or Ruru Ninox novaeseelandiae were filmed preying on eggs or chicks on 12 occasions, and Ship Rats scavenged on eggs on two occasions. Parent birds sometimes altered the signs left at nests after predation, which confused identification of the predator, while Ship Rat scavenger and predator signs were indistinguishable. This suggests that attempts to identify predators from nest signs could be misleading and potentially a widespread problem. Time‐lapse video filming with infrared illumination is potentially the least biased method of identifying predators, but it is expensive and so is best used in conjunction with simpler methods. This study found no evidence that filming altered predation rates or that the predators or parent birds reacted strongly to the camera or lights, so we believe that filming is a valuable and safe technique to guide management for the recovery of critically endangered species that are threatened by predators.