SELECTION OF COLONY SITES AND NEST SITES BY COMMON TERNS STERNA HIRUNDO IN OCEAN COUNTY, NEW JERSEY

• Published in: Ibis
• Main Authors: BURGER, JOANNA, LESSER, FRED
• Format: Article in Journal/Newspaper
• Language: English
• Published: Wiley 1978
• Subjects: Sterna hirundo
• Online Access: http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1474-919x.1978.tb06810.x; https://api.wiley.com/onlinelibrary/tdm/v1/articles/10.1111%2Fj.1474-919X.1978.tb06810.x; https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111/j.1474-919X.1978.tb06810.x

SUMMARY Common Terns nested on 34 of 259 saltmarsh islands along 46 miles of Ocean County coastline, New Jersey. They nested on low islands of Spartina with less than 12%, windrow ranging in size from 0.6 to 108 acres. All islands selected by terns faced at least two miles of open water from at least one direction. Selection of islands seemed a response to vegetation, size, distance to the nearest island, distance to the nearest shore and exposure to open water. Of the 225 islands without nesting terns, only three fulfilled appropriate criteria. Eighty per cent of nests were situated on windrow. Terns laid larger clutches on windrow compated to those nesting in Spartina . Nearest neighbour distance on islands with low predation varied from 85 to 485 cm and was a function of space, vegetation, and the size of the island. Terns nested closer together on windrow compared with Spartina . Considering all colonies, the mean nearest neighbour distance negatively correlated with the number of nests. Skimmers, Oystercatchers, Laughing Gulls, and Herring Gulls nested in some of the tern colonies. All tern colonies on islands also occupied by nesting Herring Gulls suffered over 10% egg‐loss by predation. Proportionally more nests were preyed upon in windrow than in Spartina . Clutch sizes in nests in windrow on islands with predation were significantly lower than those in windrow on islands without predation, even though clutch sizes in Spartina were similar on islands with and without predation. Flooding by exceptional high tides destroyed significantly more nests in Spartina than in windrow. The nests that survived in Spartina were built deeper, and their rim heights were higher than nests destroyed by tides. Choice of colony and nest sites is discussed in terms of the balance of two selection pressures: predation and tidal flooding. Tern nests on windrow are more exposed to predators, but safer from flooding, whereas those nests in Spartina are more susceptible to flooding and less vulnerable to predators. The recent ...