Conservation biogeography of the Antarctic

Abstract Aim To present a synthesis of past biogeographic analyses and a new approach based on spatially explicit biodiversity information for the Antarctic region to identify biologically distinct areas in need of representation in a protected area network. Location Antarctica and the sub‐Antarctic...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Published in:Diversity and Distributions
Main Authors: Terauds, Aleks, Chown, Steven L., Morgan, Fraser, J. Peat, Helen, Watts, David J., Keys, Harry, Convey, Peter, Bergstrom, Dana M.
Format: Article in Journal/Newspaper
Language:English
Published: Wiley 2012
Subjects:
Online Access:http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1472-4642.2012.00925.x
https://api.wiley.com/onlinelibrary/tdm/v1/articles/10.1111%2Fj.1472-4642.2012.00925.x
https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111/j.1472-4642.2012.00925.x
https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full-xml/10.1111/j.1472-4642.2012.00925.x
id crwiley:10.1111/j.1472-4642.2012.00925.x
record_format openpolar
spelling crwiley:10.1111/j.1472-4642.2012.00925.x 2024-09-15T17:44:52+00:00 Conservation biogeography of the Antarctic Terauds, Aleks Chown, Steven L. Morgan, Fraser J. Peat, Helen Watts, David J. Keys, Harry Convey, Peter Bergstrom, Dana M. 2012 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1472-4642.2012.00925.x https://api.wiley.com/onlinelibrary/tdm/v1/articles/10.1111%2Fj.1472-4642.2012.00925.x https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111/j.1472-4642.2012.00925.x https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full-xml/10.1111/j.1472-4642.2012.00925.x en eng Wiley http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/termsAndConditions#vor Diversity and Distributions volume 18, issue 7, page 726-741 ISSN 1366-9516 1472-4642 journal-article 2012 crwiley https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1472-4642.2012.00925.x 2024-08-15T04:18:57Z Abstract Aim To present a synthesis of past biogeographic analyses and a new approach based on spatially explicit biodiversity information for the Antarctic region to identify biologically distinct areas in need of representation in a protected area network. Location Antarctica and the sub‐Antarctic. Methods We reviewed and summarized published biogeographic studies of the Antarctic. We then developed a biogeographic classification for terrestrial conservation planning in Antarctica by combining the most comprehensive source of Antarctic biodiversity data available with three spatial frameworks: (1) a 200‐km grid, (2) a set of areas based on physical parameters known as the environmental domains of Antarctica and (3) expert‐defined bioregions. We used these frameworks, or combinations thereof, together with multivariate techniques to identify biologically distinct areas. Results Early studies of continental Antarctica typically described broad bioregions, with the Antarctic Peninsula usually identified as biologically distinct from continental Antarctica; later studies suggested a more complex biogeography. Increasing complexity also characterizes the sub‐Antarctic and marine realms, with differences among studies often attributable to the focal taxa. Using the most comprehensive terrestrial data available and by combining the groups formed by the environmental domains and expert‐defined bioregions, we were able to identify 15 biologically distinct, ice‐free, Antarctic Conservation Biogeographic Regions ( ACBR s), encompassing the continent and close lying islands. Main conclusions Ice‐free terrestrial Antarctica comprises several distinct bioregions that are not fully represented in the current Antarctic Specially Protected Area network. Biosecurity measures between these ACBR s should also be developed to prevent biotic homogenization in the region. Article in Journal/Newspaper Antarc* Antarctic Antarctic Peninsula Antarctica Wiley Online Library Diversity and Distributions 18 7 726 741
institution Open Polar
collection Wiley Online Library
op_collection_id crwiley
language English
description Abstract Aim To present a synthesis of past biogeographic analyses and a new approach based on spatially explicit biodiversity information for the Antarctic region to identify biologically distinct areas in need of representation in a protected area network. Location Antarctica and the sub‐Antarctic. Methods We reviewed and summarized published biogeographic studies of the Antarctic. We then developed a biogeographic classification for terrestrial conservation planning in Antarctica by combining the most comprehensive source of Antarctic biodiversity data available with three spatial frameworks: (1) a 200‐km grid, (2) a set of areas based on physical parameters known as the environmental domains of Antarctica and (3) expert‐defined bioregions. We used these frameworks, or combinations thereof, together with multivariate techniques to identify biologically distinct areas. Results Early studies of continental Antarctica typically described broad bioregions, with the Antarctic Peninsula usually identified as biologically distinct from continental Antarctica; later studies suggested a more complex biogeography. Increasing complexity also characterizes the sub‐Antarctic and marine realms, with differences among studies often attributable to the focal taxa. Using the most comprehensive terrestrial data available and by combining the groups formed by the environmental domains and expert‐defined bioregions, we were able to identify 15 biologically distinct, ice‐free, Antarctic Conservation Biogeographic Regions ( ACBR s), encompassing the continent and close lying islands. Main conclusions Ice‐free terrestrial Antarctica comprises several distinct bioregions that are not fully represented in the current Antarctic Specially Protected Area network. Biosecurity measures between these ACBR s should also be developed to prevent biotic homogenization in the region.
format Article in Journal/Newspaper
author Terauds, Aleks
Chown, Steven L.
Morgan, Fraser
J. Peat, Helen
Watts, David J.
Keys, Harry
Convey, Peter
Bergstrom, Dana M.
spellingShingle Terauds, Aleks
Chown, Steven L.
Morgan, Fraser
J. Peat, Helen
Watts, David J.
Keys, Harry
Convey, Peter
Bergstrom, Dana M.
Conservation biogeography of the Antarctic
author_facet Terauds, Aleks
Chown, Steven L.
Morgan, Fraser
J. Peat, Helen
Watts, David J.
Keys, Harry
Convey, Peter
Bergstrom, Dana M.
author_sort Terauds, Aleks
title Conservation biogeography of the Antarctic
title_short Conservation biogeography of the Antarctic
title_full Conservation biogeography of the Antarctic
title_fullStr Conservation biogeography of the Antarctic
title_full_unstemmed Conservation biogeography of the Antarctic
title_sort conservation biogeography of the antarctic
publisher Wiley
publishDate 2012
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1472-4642.2012.00925.x
https://api.wiley.com/onlinelibrary/tdm/v1/articles/10.1111%2Fj.1472-4642.2012.00925.x
https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111/j.1472-4642.2012.00925.x
https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full-xml/10.1111/j.1472-4642.2012.00925.x
genre Antarc*
Antarctic
Antarctic Peninsula
Antarctica
genre_facet Antarc*
Antarctic
Antarctic Peninsula
Antarctica
op_source Diversity and Distributions
volume 18, issue 7, page 726-741
ISSN 1366-9516 1472-4642
op_rights http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/termsAndConditions#vor
op_doi https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1472-4642.2012.00925.x
container_title Diversity and Distributions
container_volume 18
container_issue 7
container_start_page 726
op_container_end_page 741
_version_ 1810492550910312448