The manifestation of viewpoint aspect in Inuktitut*
Abstract. This article refutes the claim ( Swift and Bohnemeyer 2004 ) that viewpoint aspect in Inuktitut is determined wholly by telicity. We claim that, in fact, Inuktitut lacks default viewpoint aspect altogether. This article follows Cowper (2005) and Kyriakaki (2006) in assuming that viewpoint...
Published in: | Studia Linguistica |
---|---|
Main Author: | |
Format: | Article in Journal/Newspaper |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Wiley
2009
|
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9582.2009.01163.x https://api.wiley.com/onlinelibrary/tdm/v1/articles/10.1111%2Fj.1467-9582.2009.01163.x https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111/j.1467-9582.2009.01163.x |
id |
crwiley:10.1111/j.1467-9582.2009.01163.x |
---|---|
record_format |
openpolar |
spelling |
crwiley:10.1111/j.1467-9582.2009.01163.x 2024-06-02T08:09:34+00:00 The manifestation of viewpoint aspect in Inuktitut* Clarke, Sarah 2009 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9582.2009.01163.x https://api.wiley.com/onlinelibrary/tdm/v1/articles/10.1111%2Fj.1467-9582.2009.01163.x https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111/j.1467-9582.2009.01163.x en eng Wiley http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/termsAndConditions#vor Studia Linguistica volume 63, issue 3, page 292-322 ISSN 0039-3193 1467-9582 journal-article 2009 crwiley https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9582.2009.01163.x 2024-05-03T10:58:51Z Abstract. This article refutes the claim ( Swift and Bohnemeyer 2004 ) that viewpoint aspect in Inuktitut is determined wholly by telicity. We claim that, in fact, Inuktitut lacks default viewpoint aspect altogether. This article follows Cowper (2005) and Kyriakaki (2006) in assuming that viewpoint aspect can be encoded with the morphosyntactic features Interval (imperfective aspect) and Moment (perfective aspect), which are possible dependents of the feature Event. We show that, while English has two past tense constructions, one of which is infelicitous with states because it spells out Interval, the dependent feature of Event, Inuktitut has only one. There is no tense construction in Inuktitut that is felicitous only with events, indicating that there is none that spells out a dependent of the feature Event. Other tests for perfectivity and imperfectivity prove inconclusive in Inuktitut; there is no evidence of a feature Interval or Moment. Thus, we conclude that no such feature exists. Therefore, all Inuktitut clauses are neither perfective nor imperfective, but simply unmarked with respect to viewpoint aspect. We further show that the locus of all aspectual variation in Inuktitut is little v, and that this variation relates to lexical aspect only, not viewpoint aspect. Article in Journal/Newspaper inuktitut Wiley Online Library Studia Linguistica 63 3 292 322 |
institution |
Open Polar |
collection |
Wiley Online Library |
op_collection_id |
crwiley |
language |
English |
description |
Abstract. This article refutes the claim ( Swift and Bohnemeyer 2004 ) that viewpoint aspect in Inuktitut is determined wholly by telicity. We claim that, in fact, Inuktitut lacks default viewpoint aspect altogether. This article follows Cowper (2005) and Kyriakaki (2006) in assuming that viewpoint aspect can be encoded with the morphosyntactic features Interval (imperfective aspect) and Moment (perfective aspect), which are possible dependents of the feature Event. We show that, while English has two past tense constructions, one of which is infelicitous with states because it spells out Interval, the dependent feature of Event, Inuktitut has only one. There is no tense construction in Inuktitut that is felicitous only with events, indicating that there is none that spells out a dependent of the feature Event. Other tests for perfectivity and imperfectivity prove inconclusive in Inuktitut; there is no evidence of a feature Interval or Moment. Thus, we conclude that no such feature exists. Therefore, all Inuktitut clauses are neither perfective nor imperfective, but simply unmarked with respect to viewpoint aspect. We further show that the locus of all aspectual variation in Inuktitut is little v, and that this variation relates to lexical aspect only, not viewpoint aspect. |
format |
Article in Journal/Newspaper |
author |
Clarke, Sarah |
spellingShingle |
Clarke, Sarah The manifestation of viewpoint aspect in Inuktitut* |
author_facet |
Clarke, Sarah |
author_sort |
Clarke, Sarah |
title |
The manifestation of viewpoint aspect in Inuktitut* |
title_short |
The manifestation of viewpoint aspect in Inuktitut* |
title_full |
The manifestation of viewpoint aspect in Inuktitut* |
title_fullStr |
The manifestation of viewpoint aspect in Inuktitut* |
title_full_unstemmed |
The manifestation of viewpoint aspect in Inuktitut* |
title_sort |
manifestation of viewpoint aspect in inuktitut* |
publisher |
Wiley |
publishDate |
2009 |
url |
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9582.2009.01163.x https://api.wiley.com/onlinelibrary/tdm/v1/articles/10.1111%2Fj.1467-9582.2009.01163.x https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111/j.1467-9582.2009.01163.x |
genre |
inuktitut |
genre_facet |
inuktitut |
op_source |
Studia Linguistica volume 63, issue 3, page 292-322 ISSN 0039-3193 1467-9582 |
op_rights |
http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/termsAndConditions#vor |
op_doi |
https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9582.2009.01163.x |
container_title |
Studia Linguistica |
container_volume |
63 |
container_issue |
3 |
container_start_page |
292 |
op_container_end_page |
322 |
_version_ |
1800755306532175872 |