Using biodiversity deconstruction to disentangle assembly and diversity dynamics of understorey plants along post‐fire succession in boreal forest

• Published in: Global Ecology and Biogeography
• Main Authors: Azeria, Ermias T., Bouchard, Mathieu, Pothier, David, Fortin, Daniel, Hébert, Christian
• Format: Article in Journal/Newspaper
• Language: English
• Published: Wiley 2010
• Subjects: Rugosa; Empetrum nigrum
• Online Access: http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1466-8238.2010.00580.x; https://api.wiley.com/onlinelibrary/tdm/v1/articles/10.1111%2Fj.1466-8238.2010.00580.x; https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111/j.1466-8238.2010.00580.x

ABSTRACT Aim The study aims to decipher the co‐occurrence of understorey plant assemblages and, accordingly, to identify a set of species groups (diversity deconstruction) to better understand the multiple causal processes underlying post‐fire succession and diversity patterns in boreal forest. Location North‐eastern Canadian boreal forest (49°07′–51°44′ N; 70°13′–65°15′ W). Methods Data on understorey plant communities and habitat factors were collected from 1097 plots. Species co‐occurrence was analysed using null model analysis. We derive species groups (i.e. biodiversity deconstruction) using the strength of pairwise species co‐occurrences after accounting for random expectation under a null model and cluster analyses. We examine the influence of a set of spatiotemporal environmental variables (overstorey composition, time‐since‐fire, spatial location and topography) on richness of species groups using Bayesian model averaging, and their relative influence through hierarchical partitioning of variance. Results Understorey plant assemblages were highly structured, with co‐occurrence‐based classification providing species groups that were coherently aggregated within, but variably segregated between, species groups. Group richness models indicate both common and distinct responses to factors affecting plant succession. For example, Group 2 (e.g. Rhododendron groenlandicum and Cladina rangiferina ) showed concurrent contrasting responses to overstorey composition and was strongly segregated from Groups 3 (e.g. Clintonia borealis and Maianthenum canadense ) and 4 (e.g. Epilobium angustifolium and Alnus rugosa ). Groups 3 and 4 showed partial similarity, but they differed in their response to time‐since‐fire, drainage and latitude, which were more important for Group 1 (e.g. Ptilium crista‐castrensis and Empetrum nigrum ). A single successional model based on total richness masked crucial group‐level relationships with factors that we examined, such as latitude. Main conclusions By demonstrating the co‐occurrence ...