The contribution of mistletoes to nutrient returns: Evidence for a critical role in nutrient cycling

• Published in: Austral Ecology
• Main Authors: MARCH, WENDY A., WATSON, DAVID M.
• Format: Article in Journal/Newspaper
• Language: English
• Published: Wiley 2010
• Subjects: Tundra
• Online Access: http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1442-9993.2009.02056.x; https://api.wiley.com/onlinelibrary/tdm/v1/articles/10.1111%2Fj.1442-9993.2009.02056.x; https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111/j.1442-9993.2009.02056.x

Abstract Both nutrient cycling and nutrient relationships between mistletoe and host have been widely studied; yet it is unclear whether high nutrient concentrations commonly found in mistletoes affect rates of nutrient cycling. To address this question, we assessed 13 elements in the leaf litter of a temperate eucalypt forest in southern New South Wales, comparing concentrations from trees ( Eucalyptus blakelyi , E. dwyeri , and E. dealbata ) with and without the hemiparasitic mistletoe Amyema miquelii . Results were in accord with previous research on fresh leaves showing that concentrations of many elements were higher in the mistletoe than the host. This was not the case for all elements; most notably for N, where concentrations were significantly lower in the mistletoe. However, the return of all elements increased with mistletoe infection because of the combined effect of enrichment in mistletoe tissues and high rates of mistletoe litterfall. Annual returns of N and P in leaf litter increased by a factor of 1.65 and 3 respectively, with the greatest increase being for K by a factor of 43 in spring. These increased element returns were not significantly influenced by any changes in host leaf litter quality, as mistletoe infection was not found to affect host element concentrations. Mistletoe infection also altered the spatial and temporal distribution of element returns because of the patchy occurrence of mistletoes and extended period of mistletoe litterfall compared with the host. These findings provide a mechanistic explanation for the role of mistletoes as a keystone resource and, together with comparable results from root‐parasitic plants in boreal tundra and cool‐temperate grasslands, suggest that enhancing nutrient return rates may be a generalized property of parasitic plants.