The Protector Species Hypothesis: Do Black Skimmers Find Refuge from Predators in Gull‐billed Tern Colonies?

Abstract The protector‐species hypothesis explains mixed‐species coloniality on the basis of benefits individuals of a species may receive by nesting with another species, the ‘protector’ species, that responds aggressively to potential threats. The reactions of nesting individuals to both natural a...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Published in:Ethology
Main Authors: Pius, Sandra M., Leberg, Paul L.
Format: Article in Journal/Newspaper
Language:English
Published: Wiley 1998
Subjects:
Online Access:http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1439-0310.1998.tb00068.x
https://api.wiley.com/onlinelibrary/tdm/v1/articles/10.1111%2Fj.1439-0310.1998.tb00068.x
https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111/j.1439-0310.1998.tb00068.x
id crwiley:10.1111/j.1439-0310.1998.tb00068.x
record_format openpolar
spelling crwiley:10.1111/j.1439-0310.1998.tb00068.x 2024-09-15T17:54:39+00:00 The Protector Species Hypothesis: Do Black Skimmers Find Refuge from Predators in Gull‐billed Tern Colonies? Pius, Sandra M. Leberg, Paul L. 1998 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1439-0310.1998.tb00068.x https://api.wiley.com/onlinelibrary/tdm/v1/articles/10.1111%2Fj.1439-0310.1998.tb00068.x https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111/j.1439-0310.1998.tb00068.x en eng Wiley http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/termsAndConditions#vor Ethology volume 104, issue 4, page 273-284 ISSN 0179-1613 1439-0310 journal-article 1998 crwiley https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1439-0310.1998.tb00068.x 2024-06-27T04:21:14Z Abstract The protector‐species hypothesis explains mixed‐species coloniality on the basis of benefits individuals of a species may receive by nesting with another species, the ‘protector’ species, that responds aggressively to potential threats. The reactions of nesting individuals to both natural and model predators were observed to determine whether black skimmers ( Rhynchops niger ) gain an antipredator advantage by nesting with gull‐billed terns ( Sterna nilotica ). Observations of natural predators were gathered from three mixed‐species and three single‐species (black skimmers) subcolonies. Natural predators most commonly encountered by the colonies were herring gulls ( Larus argentatus ), laughing gulls ( Larus atricilla ), and ruddy turnstones ( Arenaria interpres ). Gull‐billed terns responded to the gulls, but not to the turnstones, in higher proportions than did black skimmers. Two decoys, a mink and a gull, were used to simulate predatory encounters, and a duck decoy was used as a control at two mixed‐species and one single‐species subcolonies. Gull‐billed terns responded in significantly higher proportions than did skimmers to all decoy treatments in the mixed‐species subcolonies. Mobbing of both natural and model predators by the terns suggests that skimmers may gain a reproductive advantage by nesting with these terns. However, the response of black skimmers to both natural and simulated predators was independent of the presence of gull‐billed terns in the colony, indicating that black skimmers may not perceive these objects as threats, or may react differently to predators than do gull‐billed terns. Article in Journal/Newspaper Arenaria interpres Wiley Online Library Ethology 104 4 273 284
institution Open Polar
collection Wiley Online Library
op_collection_id crwiley
language English
description Abstract The protector‐species hypothesis explains mixed‐species coloniality on the basis of benefits individuals of a species may receive by nesting with another species, the ‘protector’ species, that responds aggressively to potential threats. The reactions of nesting individuals to both natural and model predators were observed to determine whether black skimmers ( Rhynchops niger ) gain an antipredator advantage by nesting with gull‐billed terns ( Sterna nilotica ). Observations of natural predators were gathered from three mixed‐species and three single‐species (black skimmers) subcolonies. Natural predators most commonly encountered by the colonies were herring gulls ( Larus argentatus ), laughing gulls ( Larus atricilla ), and ruddy turnstones ( Arenaria interpres ). Gull‐billed terns responded to the gulls, but not to the turnstones, in higher proportions than did black skimmers. Two decoys, a mink and a gull, were used to simulate predatory encounters, and a duck decoy was used as a control at two mixed‐species and one single‐species subcolonies. Gull‐billed terns responded in significantly higher proportions than did skimmers to all decoy treatments in the mixed‐species subcolonies. Mobbing of both natural and model predators by the terns suggests that skimmers may gain a reproductive advantage by nesting with these terns. However, the response of black skimmers to both natural and simulated predators was independent of the presence of gull‐billed terns in the colony, indicating that black skimmers may not perceive these objects as threats, or may react differently to predators than do gull‐billed terns.
format Article in Journal/Newspaper
author Pius, Sandra M.
Leberg, Paul L.
spellingShingle Pius, Sandra M.
Leberg, Paul L.
The Protector Species Hypothesis: Do Black Skimmers Find Refuge from Predators in Gull‐billed Tern Colonies?
author_facet Pius, Sandra M.
Leberg, Paul L.
author_sort Pius, Sandra M.
title The Protector Species Hypothesis: Do Black Skimmers Find Refuge from Predators in Gull‐billed Tern Colonies?
title_short The Protector Species Hypothesis: Do Black Skimmers Find Refuge from Predators in Gull‐billed Tern Colonies?
title_full The Protector Species Hypothesis: Do Black Skimmers Find Refuge from Predators in Gull‐billed Tern Colonies?
title_fullStr The Protector Species Hypothesis: Do Black Skimmers Find Refuge from Predators in Gull‐billed Tern Colonies?
title_full_unstemmed The Protector Species Hypothesis: Do Black Skimmers Find Refuge from Predators in Gull‐billed Tern Colonies?
title_sort protector species hypothesis: do black skimmers find refuge from predators in gull‐billed tern colonies?
publisher Wiley
publishDate 1998
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1439-0310.1998.tb00068.x
https://api.wiley.com/onlinelibrary/tdm/v1/articles/10.1111%2Fj.1439-0310.1998.tb00068.x
https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111/j.1439-0310.1998.tb00068.x
genre Arenaria interpres
genre_facet Arenaria interpres
op_source Ethology
volume 104, issue 4, page 273-284
ISSN 0179-1613 1439-0310
op_rights http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/termsAndConditions#vor
op_doi https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1439-0310.1998.tb00068.x
container_title Ethology
container_volume 104
container_issue 4
container_start_page 273
op_container_end_page 284
_version_ 1810430992271278080