Gross pathology and its relationship with histopathology of amoebic gill disease (AGD) in farmed Atlantic salmon, Salmo salar L.

Abstract Gross pathological assessment of amoebic gill disease (AGD) is the only non‐destructive, financially viable method for rapid and broad‐scale disease management of farmed Atlantic salmon, Salmo salar L., in Tasmania. However, given the presumptive nature of this diagnosis, the technique has...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Published in:Journal of Fish Diseases
Main Authors: Adams, M B, Ellard, K, Nowak, B F
Format: Article in Journal/Newspaper
Language:English
Published: Wiley 2004
Subjects:
Online Access:http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2761.2004.00526.x
https://api.wiley.com/onlinelibrary/tdm/v1/articles/10.1111%2Fj.1365-2761.2004.00526.x
https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111/j.1365-2761.2004.00526.x
id crwiley:10.1111/j.1365-2761.2004.00526.x
record_format openpolar
spelling crwiley:10.1111/j.1365-2761.2004.00526.x 2024-09-15T17:55:59+00:00 Gross pathology and its relationship with histopathology of amoebic gill disease (AGD) in farmed Atlantic salmon, Salmo salar L. Adams, M B Ellard, K Nowak, B F 2004 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2761.2004.00526.x https://api.wiley.com/onlinelibrary/tdm/v1/articles/10.1111%2Fj.1365-2761.2004.00526.x https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111/j.1365-2761.2004.00526.x en eng Wiley http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/termsAndConditions#vor Journal of Fish Diseases volume 27, issue 3, page 151-161 ISSN 0140-7775 1365-2761 journal-article 2004 crwiley https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2761.2004.00526.x 2024-08-01T04:19:56Z Abstract Gross pathological assessment of amoebic gill disease (AGD) is the only non‐destructive, financially viable method for rapid and broad‐scale disease management of farmed Atlantic salmon, Salmo salar L., in Tasmania. However, given the presumptive nature of this diagnosis, the technique has been considered questionable. This study investigated the degree of conformity between clinical signs and histological lesions observed in a commercial setting. Three groups of Atlantic salmon ( n = 42, 100 and 100, respectively) were collected from various farm sites in southern Tasmania between December 2001 and April 2003. Micro‐stereoscopic analysis showed that grossly affected tissue regions correspond to areas of hyperplastic lamellar fusion, generally in association with attached Neoparamoeba sp. Agreement between gross signs of AGD and histopathological diagnosis was compared. Kappa analysis indicated moderate to good agreement between methods ( κ = 0.52–0.74). Individual cases of disagreement were further scrutinized and several factors were found to influence the level of agreement between the two methods. Stage of disease development, lesions derived from other pathogens, assessor interpretation/experience, sampling methods, histological technique and/or experience were potential confounding factors. It was concluded that clinical diagnosis is acceptable as a farm‐monitoring tool only. Removal of grossly affected tissue and subsequent histological examination is recommended to improve diagnostic accuracy. Article in Journal/Newspaper Atlantic salmon Salmo salar Wiley Online Library Journal of Fish Diseases 27 3 151 161
institution Open Polar
collection Wiley Online Library
op_collection_id crwiley
language English
description Abstract Gross pathological assessment of amoebic gill disease (AGD) is the only non‐destructive, financially viable method for rapid and broad‐scale disease management of farmed Atlantic salmon, Salmo salar L., in Tasmania. However, given the presumptive nature of this diagnosis, the technique has been considered questionable. This study investigated the degree of conformity between clinical signs and histological lesions observed in a commercial setting. Three groups of Atlantic salmon ( n = 42, 100 and 100, respectively) were collected from various farm sites in southern Tasmania between December 2001 and April 2003. Micro‐stereoscopic analysis showed that grossly affected tissue regions correspond to areas of hyperplastic lamellar fusion, generally in association with attached Neoparamoeba sp. Agreement between gross signs of AGD and histopathological diagnosis was compared. Kappa analysis indicated moderate to good agreement between methods ( κ = 0.52–0.74). Individual cases of disagreement were further scrutinized and several factors were found to influence the level of agreement between the two methods. Stage of disease development, lesions derived from other pathogens, assessor interpretation/experience, sampling methods, histological technique and/or experience were potential confounding factors. It was concluded that clinical diagnosis is acceptable as a farm‐monitoring tool only. Removal of grossly affected tissue and subsequent histological examination is recommended to improve diagnostic accuracy.
format Article in Journal/Newspaper
author Adams, M B
Ellard, K
Nowak, B F
spellingShingle Adams, M B
Ellard, K
Nowak, B F
Gross pathology and its relationship with histopathology of amoebic gill disease (AGD) in farmed Atlantic salmon, Salmo salar L.
author_facet Adams, M B
Ellard, K
Nowak, B F
author_sort Adams, M B
title Gross pathology and its relationship with histopathology of amoebic gill disease (AGD) in farmed Atlantic salmon, Salmo salar L.
title_short Gross pathology and its relationship with histopathology of amoebic gill disease (AGD) in farmed Atlantic salmon, Salmo salar L.
title_full Gross pathology and its relationship with histopathology of amoebic gill disease (AGD) in farmed Atlantic salmon, Salmo salar L.
title_fullStr Gross pathology and its relationship with histopathology of amoebic gill disease (AGD) in farmed Atlantic salmon, Salmo salar L.
title_full_unstemmed Gross pathology and its relationship with histopathology of amoebic gill disease (AGD) in farmed Atlantic salmon, Salmo salar L.
title_sort gross pathology and its relationship with histopathology of amoebic gill disease (agd) in farmed atlantic salmon, salmo salar l.
publisher Wiley
publishDate 2004
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2761.2004.00526.x
https://api.wiley.com/onlinelibrary/tdm/v1/articles/10.1111%2Fj.1365-2761.2004.00526.x
https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111/j.1365-2761.2004.00526.x
genre Atlantic salmon
Salmo salar
genre_facet Atlantic salmon
Salmo salar
op_source Journal of Fish Diseases
volume 27, issue 3, page 151-161
ISSN 0140-7775 1365-2761
op_rights http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/termsAndConditions#vor
op_doi https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2761.2004.00526.x
container_title Journal of Fish Diseases
container_volume 27
container_issue 3
container_start_page 151
op_container_end_page 161
_version_ 1810432195351805952