Carry‐over effects of spring hunt and climate on recruitment to the natal colony in a migratory species

• Published in: Journal of Applied Ecology
• Main Authors: Juillet, Cédric, Choquet, Rémi, Gauthier, Gilles, Lefebvre, Josée, Pradel, Roger
• Other Authors: Stephens, Phil
• Format: Article in Journal/Newspaper
• Language: English
• Published: Wiley 2012
• Subjects: Bylot Island; North Atlantic; North Atlantic oscillation; Nunavut
• Online Access: http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2664.2012.02199.x; https://api.wiley.com/onlinelibrary/tdm/v1/articles/10.1111%2Fj.1365-2664.2012.02199.x; https://besjournals.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111/j.1365-2664.2012.02199.x

Summary In long‐lived species, temporal variation in recruitment, defined as the entry of new individuals into the breeding population, can have a large effect on population growth rate. While hunting, as a management tool, is generally expected to control population size via increased mortality, it may also act by affecting recruitment. Although the impact of hunting on survival is well studied, less attention has been paid to the non‐lethal impacts of hunting on recruitment. To control the population size of the greater snow goose C hen caerulescens atlantica , an overabundant arctic‐nesting species, a spring hunting season was implemented from 1999 onwards in addition to the traditional autumn and winter hunting seasons. We investigated the potential carry‐over effect of spring hunting on recruitment of females to their natal colony on Bylot Island, Nunavut, Canada from 1992 to 2005 while accounting for other potential confounding factors, primarily climatic effects. We applied a multistate capture‐Mark‐Recapture recruitment model to a dataset of known‐age individuals ( n = 12 100), combining live recaptures at the breeding colony with dead recoveries from hunters. Annual variation in recruitment probability was best explained by spring hunt and a synthetic variable combining the climatic conditions experienced during migration (extreme values of the North Atlantic Oscillation index) with conditions upon arrival at the breeding grounds (snow cover). This model accounted for 58% of the temporal variation in recruitment, while the harvest rate or the climatic index taken alone accounted for 38% each. In the year with the highest spring hunting pressure (adult harvest rate ≈6%), recruitment was reduced by up to 50% compared to years with no hunt and similar average climatic conditions. Synthesis and applications . We conclude that there was a negative impact of the spring hunt not only on survival but also on recruitment in greater snow geese. These non‐lethal effects of hunting must be considered in management ...