Generalized estimating equations and generalized linear mixed‐effects models for modelling resource selection

Summary Accurate resource selection functions (RSFs) are important for managing animal populations. Developing RSFs using data from GPS telemetry can be problematic due to serial autocorrelation, but modern analytical techniques can help to compensate for this correlation. We used telemetry location...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Published in:Journal of Applied Ecology
Main Authors: Koper, Nicola, Manseau, Micheline
Format: Article in Journal/Newspaper
Language:English
Published: Wiley 2009
Subjects:
Online Access:http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2664.2009.01642.x
https://api.wiley.com/onlinelibrary/tdm/v1/articles/10.1111%2Fj.1365-2664.2009.01642.x
https://besjournals.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111/j.1365-2664.2009.01642.x
id crwiley:10.1111/j.1365-2664.2009.01642.x
record_format openpolar
spelling crwiley:10.1111/j.1365-2664.2009.01642.x 2024-09-15T18:01:46+00:00 Generalized estimating equations and generalized linear mixed‐effects models for modelling resource selection Koper, Nicola Manseau, Micheline 2009 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2664.2009.01642.x https://api.wiley.com/onlinelibrary/tdm/v1/articles/10.1111%2Fj.1365-2664.2009.01642.x https://besjournals.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111/j.1365-2664.2009.01642.x en eng Wiley http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/termsAndConditions#vor Journal of Applied Ecology volume 46, issue 3, page 590-599 ISSN 0021-8901 1365-2664 journal-article 2009 crwiley https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2664.2009.01642.x 2024-08-22T04:17:04Z Summary Accurate resource selection functions (RSFs) are important for managing animal populations. Developing RSFs using data from GPS telemetry can be problematic due to serial autocorrelation, but modern analytical techniques can help to compensate for this correlation. We used telemetry locations from 18 woodland caribou Rangifer tarandus caribou in Saskatchewan, Canada, to compare marginal (population‐specific) generalized estimating equations (GEEs), and conditional (subject‐specific) generalized linear mixed‐effects models (GLMMs), for developing resource selection functions at two spatial scales. We evaluated the use of empirical standard errors, which are robust to misspecification of the correlation structure. We compared these approaches with destructive sampling. Statistical significance was strongly influenced by the use of empirical vs. model‐based standard errors, and marginal (GEE) and conditional (GLMM) results differed. Destructive sampling reduced apparent habitat selection. k ‐fold cross‐validation results differed for GEE and GLMM, as it must be applied differently for each model. Synthesis and applications . Due to their different interpretations, marginal models (e.g. generalized estimating equations, GEEs) may be better for landscape and population management, while conditional models (e.g. generalized linear mixed‐effects models, GLMMs) may be better for management of endangered species and individuals. Destructive sampling may lead to inaccurate resource selection functions (RSFs), but GEEs and GLMMs can be used for developing RSFs when used with empirical standard errors. Article in Journal/Newspaper caribou Rangifer tarandus Wiley Online Library Journal of Applied Ecology 46 3 590 599
institution Open Polar
collection Wiley Online Library
op_collection_id crwiley
language English
description Summary Accurate resource selection functions (RSFs) are important for managing animal populations. Developing RSFs using data from GPS telemetry can be problematic due to serial autocorrelation, but modern analytical techniques can help to compensate for this correlation. We used telemetry locations from 18 woodland caribou Rangifer tarandus caribou in Saskatchewan, Canada, to compare marginal (population‐specific) generalized estimating equations (GEEs), and conditional (subject‐specific) generalized linear mixed‐effects models (GLMMs), for developing resource selection functions at two spatial scales. We evaluated the use of empirical standard errors, which are robust to misspecification of the correlation structure. We compared these approaches with destructive sampling. Statistical significance was strongly influenced by the use of empirical vs. model‐based standard errors, and marginal (GEE) and conditional (GLMM) results differed. Destructive sampling reduced apparent habitat selection. k ‐fold cross‐validation results differed for GEE and GLMM, as it must be applied differently for each model. Synthesis and applications . Due to their different interpretations, marginal models (e.g. generalized estimating equations, GEEs) may be better for landscape and population management, while conditional models (e.g. generalized linear mixed‐effects models, GLMMs) may be better for management of endangered species and individuals. Destructive sampling may lead to inaccurate resource selection functions (RSFs), but GEEs and GLMMs can be used for developing RSFs when used with empirical standard errors.
format Article in Journal/Newspaper
author Koper, Nicola
Manseau, Micheline
spellingShingle Koper, Nicola
Manseau, Micheline
Generalized estimating equations and generalized linear mixed‐effects models for modelling resource selection
author_facet Koper, Nicola
Manseau, Micheline
author_sort Koper, Nicola
title Generalized estimating equations and generalized linear mixed‐effects models for modelling resource selection
title_short Generalized estimating equations and generalized linear mixed‐effects models for modelling resource selection
title_full Generalized estimating equations and generalized linear mixed‐effects models for modelling resource selection
title_fullStr Generalized estimating equations and generalized linear mixed‐effects models for modelling resource selection
title_full_unstemmed Generalized estimating equations and generalized linear mixed‐effects models for modelling resource selection
title_sort generalized estimating equations and generalized linear mixed‐effects models for modelling resource selection
publisher Wiley
publishDate 2009
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2664.2009.01642.x
https://api.wiley.com/onlinelibrary/tdm/v1/articles/10.1111%2Fj.1365-2664.2009.01642.x
https://besjournals.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111/j.1365-2664.2009.01642.x
genre caribou
Rangifer tarandus
genre_facet caribou
Rangifer tarandus
op_source Journal of Applied Ecology
volume 46, issue 3, page 590-599
ISSN 0021-8901 1365-2664
op_rights http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/termsAndConditions#vor
op_doi https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2664.2009.01642.x
container_title Journal of Applied Ecology
container_volume 46
container_issue 3
container_start_page 590
op_container_end_page 599
_version_ 1810438842193281024