Simulation and jack‐knifing assessment of home‐range indices based on underlying trajectories

• Published in: Journal of Applied Ecology
• Main Authors: ROBERTSON, PETER A., AEBISCHER, NICHOLAS J., KENWARDS, ROBERT E., HANSKI, ILPO K., WILLIAMS, NICK P.
• Format: Article in Journal/Newspaper
• Language: English
• Published: Wiley 1998
• Subjects: Accipiter gentilis
• Online Access: http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2664.1998.tb00010.x; https://api.wiley.com/onlinelibrary/tdm/v1/articles/10.1111%2Fj.1365-2664.1998.tb00010.x; https://besjournals.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111/j.1365-2664.1998.tb00010.x

SUMMARY Home‐range indices, describing the area over which an animal moves or within which it concentrates its activity, are widely used in the analysis of animal movement, habitat selection, interaction and survival, the basic topics of applied animal ecology. However, the wide range of available indices and a poor understanding of their statistical properties limits their applicability, their interpretation and the ease by which comparisons can be made. These restrict many analyses to qualitative rather than quantitative assessments of home‐range. We present an analysis of home‐range indices under different conditions to assess their relative performance quantitatively, and we suggest a method of correcting for biases to allow quantitative comparisons between studies and techniques. 2. We compared the performance of a range of current home‐range indices against the underlying animal trajectory. A moving animal describes a trajectory, a continuous line of movement through space and time. Home‐range is redefined as an outline enclosing a specified proportion of the trajectory over a specified period. This definition allows the performance of different home‐range indices to be compared quantitatively. Detailed radiotracking data from a chaffinch Friagilla coelebs L. and a goshawk Accipiter gentilis L. were used to reconstruct trajectories. Intermittent radiotracking was simulated by randomly extracting 200 sets, each of 30, 100 and 500 fixes for each animal. Seven home‐range indices were used to generate home‐range outlines at nominal 20%, 30%, do%, 50%, 60%, 70%, SO%, 85%, 90%, 95% and 100% cores. The area estimates, mean/variance ratio of area, overlap, percentage inclusion of trajectory, and trajectory density within each outline were used to compare the effectiveness of techniques and their ability to provide quantitative measures of animal use. No technique performed well under all criteria. There was a spectrum of performance from techniques producing outlines with high trajectory density, low spatial ...