The vulnerability of juvenile signal crayfish to perch and eel predation

SUMMARY 1. We conducted laboratory experiments to determine how juvenile signal crayfish ( Pacifastacus leniusculus ) responded to two predators with different foraging behaviours (European eel Anguilla anguilla and European perch Perca fluviatilis ), and whether these responses affected their vulne...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Published in:Freshwater Biology
Main Authors: BLAKE, M.A., HART, P.J.B.
Format: Article in Journal/Newspaper
Language:English
Published: Wiley 1995
Subjects:
Online Access:http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2427.1995.tb01164.x
https://api.wiley.com/onlinelibrary/tdm/v1/articles/10.1111%2Fj.1365-2427.1995.tb01164.x
https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111/j.1365-2427.1995.tb01164.x
id crwiley:10.1111/j.1365-2427.1995.tb01164.x
record_format openpolar
spelling crwiley:10.1111/j.1365-2427.1995.tb01164.x 2024-06-02T07:55:11+00:00 The vulnerability of juvenile signal crayfish to perch and eel predation BLAKE, M.A. HART, P.J.B. 1995 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2427.1995.tb01164.x https://api.wiley.com/onlinelibrary/tdm/v1/articles/10.1111%2Fj.1365-2427.1995.tb01164.x https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111/j.1365-2427.1995.tb01164.x en eng Wiley http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/termsAndConditions#vor Freshwater Biology volume 33, issue 2, page 233-244 ISSN 0046-5070 1365-2427 journal-article 1995 crwiley https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2427.1995.tb01164.x 2024-05-03T11:09:55Z SUMMARY 1. We conducted laboratory experiments to determine how juvenile signal crayfish ( Pacifastacus leniusculus ) responded to two predators with different foraging behaviours (European eel Anguilla anguilla and European perch Perca fluviatilis ), and whether these responses affected their vulnerability. 2. By accelerating a model predator towards crayfish which had been temporarily blinded, we assessed whether crayfish had to see predators in order to escape. Blind crayfish escaped later than did sighted crayfish attacked in the same manner. 3. Both eels and perch elicited similar evasive behaviour when approaching and attacking sighted crayfish. Crayfish usually escaped these initial attacks but perch chased and caught more crayfish than did eels. 4. In a third experiment, perch preyed more rapidly on a population of crayfish than did eels. By the end of the experiment, however, crayfish survival rates were similar in response to eel and perch predation. 5. Our results show that crayfish are well adapted to evade predatory attacks based on rapid responses to both visual and/or mechanical stimuli. The results also suggest that behaviourally, crayfish are more vulnerable to attacks by perch than by eels. We discuss these findings in relation to other factors that affect the vulnerability of crayfish to these predators. Article in Journal/Newspaper Anguilla anguilla Wiley Online Library Freshwater Biology 33 2 233 244
institution Open Polar
collection Wiley Online Library
op_collection_id crwiley
language English
description SUMMARY 1. We conducted laboratory experiments to determine how juvenile signal crayfish ( Pacifastacus leniusculus ) responded to two predators with different foraging behaviours (European eel Anguilla anguilla and European perch Perca fluviatilis ), and whether these responses affected their vulnerability. 2. By accelerating a model predator towards crayfish which had been temporarily blinded, we assessed whether crayfish had to see predators in order to escape. Blind crayfish escaped later than did sighted crayfish attacked in the same manner. 3. Both eels and perch elicited similar evasive behaviour when approaching and attacking sighted crayfish. Crayfish usually escaped these initial attacks but perch chased and caught more crayfish than did eels. 4. In a third experiment, perch preyed more rapidly on a population of crayfish than did eels. By the end of the experiment, however, crayfish survival rates were similar in response to eel and perch predation. 5. Our results show that crayfish are well adapted to evade predatory attacks based on rapid responses to both visual and/or mechanical stimuli. The results also suggest that behaviourally, crayfish are more vulnerable to attacks by perch than by eels. We discuss these findings in relation to other factors that affect the vulnerability of crayfish to these predators.
format Article in Journal/Newspaper
author BLAKE, M.A.
HART, P.J.B.
spellingShingle BLAKE, M.A.
HART, P.J.B.
The vulnerability of juvenile signal crayfish to perch and eel predation
author_facet BLAKE, M.A.
HART, P.J.B.
author_sort BLAKE, M.A.
title The vulnerability of juvenile signal crayfish to perch and eel predation
title_short The vulnerability of juvenile signal crayfish to perch and eel predation
title_full The vulnerability of juvenile signal crayfish to perch and eel predation
title_fullStr The vulnerability of juvenile signal crayfish to perch and eel predation
title_full_unstemmed The vulnerability of juvenile signal crayfish to perch and eel predation
title_sort vulnerability of juvenile signal crayfish to perch and eel predation
publisher Wiley
publishDate 1995
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2427.1995.tb01164.x
https://api.wiley.com/onlinelibrary/tdm/v1/articles/10.1111%2Fj.1365-2427.1995.tb01164.x
https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111/j.1365-2427.1995.tb01164.x
genre Anguilla anguilla
genre_facet Anguilla anguilla
op_source Freshwater Biology
volume 33, issue 2, page 233-244
ISSN 0046-5070 1365-2427
op_rights http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/termsAndConditions#vor
op_doi https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2427.1995.tb01164.x
container_title Freshwater Biology
container_volume 33
container_issue 2
container_start_page 233
op_container_end_page 244
_version_ 1800746724823662592