Controls on production of bryophytes in an arctic tundra stream

SUMMARY 1. Two bryophyte taxa ( Hygrohypnum spp. and, to a lesser extent, Fontinalis neomexicana ) were abundant in riffles within phosphorus‐fertilized reaches of the Kuparuk River (North Slope, Alaska), but were much less common in fertilized pools and virtually absent in unfertilized reaches of t...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Published in:Freshwater Biology
Main Authors: FINLAY, JACQUES C., BOWDEN, WILLIAM B.
Format: Article in Journal/Newspaper
Language:English
Published: Wiley 1994
Subjects:
Online Access:http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2427.1994.tb01139.x
https://api.wiley.com/onlinelibrary/tdm/v1/articles/10.1111%2Fj.1365-2427.1994.tb01139.x
https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111/j.1365-2427.1994.tb01139.x
id crwiley:10.1111/j.1365-2427.1994.tb01139.x
record_format openpolar
spelling crwiley:10.1111/j.1365-2427.1994.tb01139.x 2024-06-02T08:02:49+00:00 Controls on production of bryophytes in an arctic tundra stream FINLAY, JACQUES C. BOWDEN, WILLIAM B. 1994 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2427.1994.tb01139.x https://api.wiley.com/onlinelibrary/tdm/v1/articles/10.1111%2Fj.1365-2427.1994.tb01139.x https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111/j.1365-2427.1994.tb01139.x en eng Wiley http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/termsAndConditions#vor Freshwater Biology volume 32, issue 2, page 455-466 ISSN 0046-5070 1365-2427 journal-article 1994 crwiley https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2427.1994.tb01139.x 2024-05-03T11:39:28Z SUMMARY 1. Two bryophyte taxa ( Hygrohypnum spp. and, to a lesser extent, Fontinalis neomexicana ) were abundant in riffles within phosphorus‐fertilized reaches of the Kuparuk River (North Slope, Alaska), but were much less common in fertilized pools and virtually absent in unfertilized reaches of the river. We conducted field experiments using stems and clumps of both species and artificial bryophytes to test the hypotheses that bryophyte growth was strongly limited by low phosphorus concentrations in unfertilized reaches, and limited by epiphytes in fertilized pools. 2. Stem tips of Hygrohypnum spp. did not elongate when grown in unfertilized pool and riffle environments. In fertilized reaches, Hygrohypnum elongated significantly, although there was no significant difference in elongation of stem tips placed in pools [2.5 ± 0.9 cm (SD)] as opposed to riffles (2.8 ± 0.9 cm) for 32 days. 3. Stem tips of F. neomexicana elongated significantly in all sites. There was a significant difference in elongation of stem tips in control and fertilized riffles (2.1 ± 1.1 and 4.7 ± 0.1 cm, respectively) but not in tips grown in control and fertilized pools (2.8 ± 0.8 and 2.7 ± 0.9 cm, respectively). 4. Biomass increments in clumps of these same species followed similar patterns except in fertilized pools. Hygrohypnum spp. lost weight in control riffle environments and did not grow in pools, but accumulated 181 ± 44 and 335 ± 200% of initial biomass in fertilized riffles in 1992 (over 32 days) and 1993 (over 44 days), respectively. F. neomexicana accumulated 38 ± 39 and 98 ± 47% of initial biomass in 1992 in unfertilized and fertilized riffles, respectively. Total phosphorus concentrations of both bryophytes in 1992 were significantly greater when grown in fertilized riffles than control riffles. 5. Artificial mosses (untwisted, natural fibre rope) and clumps of Hygrohypnum spp. were used to assess effects of flow regime on derrital and epiphyte accumulation in the fertilized zone. Epiphyte and detrital mass was 4–4.5 times ... Article in Journal/Newspaper Arctic north slope Tundra Alaska Wiley Online Library Arctic Freshwater Biology 32 2 455 466
institution Open Polar
collection Wiley Online Library
op_collection_id crwiley
language English
description SUMMARY 1. Two bryophyte taxa ( Hygrohypnum spp. and, to a lesser extent, Fontinalis neomexicana ) were abundant in riffles within phosphorus‐fertilized reaches of the Kuparuk River (North Slope, Alaska), but were much less common in fertilized pools and virtually absent in unfertilized reaches of the river. We conducted field experiments using stems and clumps of both species and artificial bryophytes to test the hypotheses that bryophyte growth was strongly limited by low phosphorus concentrations in unfertilized reaches, and limited by epiphytes in fertilized pools. 2. Stem tips of Hygrohypnum spp. did not elongate when grown in unfertilized pool and riffle environments. In fertilized reaches, Hygrohypnum elongated significantly, although there was no significant difference in elongation of stem tips placed in pools [2.5 ± 0.9 cm (SD)] as opposed to riffles (2.8 ± 0.9 cm) for 32 days. 3. Stem tips of F. neomexicana elongated significantly in all sites. There was a significant difference in elongation of stem tips in control and fertilized riffles (2.1 ± 1.1 and 4.7 ± 0.1 cm, respectively) but not in tips grown in control and fertilized pools (2.8 ± 0.8 and 2.7 ± 0.9 cm, respectively). 4. Biomass increments in clumps of these same species followed similar patterns except in fertilized pools. Hygrohypnum spp. lost weight in control riffle environments and did not grow in pools, but accumulated 181 ± 44 and 335 ± 200% of initial biomass in fertilized riffles in 1992 (over 32 days) and 1993 (over 44 days), respectively. F. neomexicana accumulated 38 ± 39 and 98 ± 47% of initial biomass in 1992 in unfertilized and fertilized riffles, respectively. Total phosphorus concentrations of both bryophytes in 1992 were significantly greater when grown in fertilized riffles than control riffles. 5. Artificial mosses (untwisted, natural fibre rope) and clumps of Hygrohypnum spp. were used to assess effects of flow regime on derrital and epiphyte accumulation in the fertilized zone. Epiphyte and detrital mass was 4–4.5 times ...
format Article in Journal/Newspaper
author FINLAY, JACQUES C.
BOWDEN, WILLIAM B.
spellingShingle FINLAY, JACQUES C.
BOWDEN, WILLIAM B.
Controls on production of bryophytes in an arctic tundra stream
author_facet FINLAY, JACQUES C.
BOWDEN, WILLIAM B.
author_sort FINLAY, JACQUES C.
title Controls on production of bryophytes in an arctic tundra stream
title_short Controls on production of bryophytes in an arctic tundra stream
title_full Controls on production of bryophytes in an arctic tundra stream
title_fullStr Controls on production of bryophytes in an arctic tundra stream
title_full_unstemmed Controls on production of bryophytes in an arctic tundra stream
title_sort controls on production of bryophytes in an arctic tundra stream
publisher Wiley
publishDate 1994
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2427.1994.tb01139.x
https://api.wiley.com/onlinelibrary/tdm/v1/articles/10.1111%2Fj.1365-2427.1994.tb01139.x
https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111/j.1365-2427.1994.tb01139.x
geographic Arctic
geographic_facet Arctic
genre Arctic
north slope
Tundra
Alaska
genre_facet Arctic
north slope
Tundra
Alaska
op_source Freshwater Biology
volume 32, issue 2, page 455-466
ISSN 0046-5070 1365-2427
op_rights http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/termsAndConditions#vor
op_doi https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2427.1994.tb01139.x
container_title Freshwater Biology
container_volume 32
container_issue 2
container_start_page 455
op_container_end_page 466
_version_ 1800747292612886528