What is an ‘elasmobranch’? The impact of palaeontology in understanding elasmobranch phylogeny and evolution

The Subclass Elasmobranchii is widely considered nowadays to be the sister group of the Subclass Holocephali, although chimaeroid fishes were originally classified as elasmobranchs along with modern sharks and rays. While this modern systematic treatment provides an accurate reflection of the phylog...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Published in:Journal of Fish Biology
Main Author: Maisey, J. G.
Format: Article in Journal/Newspaper
Language:English
Published: Wiley 2012
Subjects:
Online Access:http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1095-8649.2012.03245.x
https://api.wiley.com/onlinelibrary/tdm/v1/articles/10.1111%2Fj.1095-8649.2012.03245.x
https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111/j.1095-8649.2012.03245.x
id crwiley:10.1111/j.1095-8649.2012.03245.x
record_format openpolar
spelling crwiley:10.1111/j.1095-8649.2012.03245.x 2024-09-15T18:36:29+00:00 What is an ‘elasmobranch’? The impact of palaeontology in understanding elasmobranch phylogeny and evolution Maisey, J. G. 2012 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1095-8649.2012.03245.x https://api.wiley.com/onlinelibrary/tdm/v1/articles/10.1111%2Fj.1095-8649.2012.03245.x https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111/j.1095-8649.2012.03245.x en eng Wiley http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/termsAndConditions#vor Journal of Fish Biology volume 80, issue 5, page 918-951 ISSN 0022-1112 1095-8649 journal-article 2012 crwiley https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1095-8649.2012.03245.x 2024-08-20T04:16:04Z The Subclass Elasmobranchii is widely considered nowadays to be the sister group of the Subclass Holocephali, although chimaeroid fishes were originally classified as elasmobranchs along with modern sharks and rays. While this modern systematic treatment provides an accurate reflection of the phylogenetic relationships among extant taxa, the classification of many extinct non‐holocephalan shark‐like chondrichthyans as elasmobranchs is challenged. A revised, apomorphy‐based definition of elasmobranchs is presented in which they are considered the equivalent of neoselachians, i.e. a monophyletic group of modern sharks and rays which not only excludes all stem and crown holocephalans, but also many Palaeozoic shark‐like chondrichthyans and even close extinct relatives of neoselachians such as hybodonts. The fossil record of elasmobranchs ( i.e. neoselachians) is reviewed, focusing not only on their earliest records but also on their subsequent distribution patterns through time. The value and limitations of the fossil record in answering questions about elasmobranch phylogeny are discussed. Extinction is seen as a major factor in shaping early elasmobranch history, especially during the Triassic. Extinctions may also have helped shape modern lamniform diversity, despite uncertainties surrounding the phylogenetic affinities of supposedly extinct clades such as cretoxyrhinids, anacoracids and odontids. Apart from these examples, and the supposed Cretaceous extinction of ‘sclerorhynchids’, elasmobranch evolution since the Jurassic has mostly involved increased diversification (especially during the Cretaceous). The biogeographical distribution of early elasmobranchs may be obscured by sampling bias, but the earliest records of numerous groups are located within the Tethyan realm. The break‐up of Gondwana, and particularly the opening of the South Atlantic Ocean (together with the development of epicontinental seaways across Brazil and Africa during the Cretaceous), provided repeated opportunities for dispersal from ... Article in Journal/Newspaper South Atlantic Ocean Wiley Online Library Journal of Fish Biology 80 5 918 951
institution Open Polar
collection Wiley Online Library
op_collection_id crwiley
language English
description The Subclass Elasmobranchii is widely considered nowadays to be the sister group of the Subclass Holocephali, although chimaeroid fishes were originally classified as elasmobranchs along with modern sharks and rays. While this modern systematic treatment provides an accurate reflection of the phylogenetic relationships among extant taxa, the classification of many extinct non‐holocephalan shark‐like chondrichthyans as elasmobranchs is challenged. A revised, apomorphy‐based definition of elasmobranchs is presented in which they are considered the equivalent of neoselachians, i.e. a monophyletic group of modern sharks and rays which not only excludes all stem and crown holocephalans, but also many Palaeozoic shark‐like chondrichthyans and even close extinct relatives of neoselachians such as hybodonts. The fossil record of elasmobranchs ( i.e. neoselachians) is reviewed, focusing not only on their earliest records but also on their subsequent distribution patterns through time. The value and limitations of the fossil record in answering questions about elasmobranch phylogeny are discussed. Extinction is seen as a major factor in shaping early elasmobranch history, especially during the Triassic. Extinctions may also have helped shape modern lamniform diversity, despite uncertainties surrounding the phylogenetic affinities of supposedly extinct clades such as cretoxyrhinids, anacoracids and odontids. Apart from these examples, and the supposed Cretaceous extinction of ‘sclerorhynchids’, elasmobranch evolution since the Jurassic has mostly involved increased diversification (especially during the Cretaceous). The biogeographical distribution of early elasmobranchs may be obscured by sampling bias, but the earliest records of numerous groups are located within the Tethyan realm. The break‐up of Gondwana, and particularly the opening of the South Atlantic Ocean (together with the development of epicontinental seaways across Brazil and Africa during the Cretaceous), provided repeated opportunities for dispersal from ...
format Article in Journal/Newspaper
author Maisey, J. G.
spellingShingle Maisey, J. G.
What is an ‘elasmobranch’? The impact of palaeontology in understanding elasmobranch phylogeny and evolution
author_facet Maisey, J. G.
author_sort Maisey, J. G.
title What is an ‘elasmobranch’? The impact of palaeontology in understanding elasmobranch phylogeny and evolution
title_short What is an ‘elasmobranch’? The impact of palaeontology in understanding elasmobranch phylogeny and evolution
title_full What is an ‘elasmobranch’? The impact of palaeontology in understanding elasmobranch phylogeny and evolution
title_fullStr What is an ‘elasmobranch’? The impact of palaeontology in understanding elasmobranch phylogeny and evolution
title_full_unstemmed What is an ‘elasmobranch’? The impact of palaeontology in understanding elasmobranch phylogeny and evolution
title_sort what is an ‘elasmobranch’? the impact of palaeontology in understanding elasmobranch phylogeny and evolution
publisher Wiley
publishDate 2012
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1095-8649.2012.03245.x
https://api.wiley.com/onlinelibrary/tdm/v1/articles/10.1111%2Fj.1095-8649.2012.03245.x
https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111/j.1095-8649.2012.03245.x
genre South Atlantic Ocean
genre_facet South Atlantic Ocean
op_source Journal of Fish Biology
volume 80, issue 5, page 918-951
ISSN 0022-1112 1095-8649
op_rights http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/termsAndConditions#vor
op_doi https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1095-8649.2012.03245.x
container_title Journal of Fish Biology
container_volume 80
container_issue 5
container_start_page 918
op_container_end_page 951
_version_ 1810480156052029440