Diet selection of lesser white‐fronted geese Anser erythropus at a spring staging area

We studied diet selection of the globally threatened lesser white‐fronted goose Anser eythropus at a spring staging area on the island of Hailuoto (64°00′N, 24°45′E), off the western coast of Finland. We determined the diet using droppings, which were collected in late May, when the geese had left t...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Published in:Ecography
Main Authors: Markkola, Juha, Niemelä, Marika, Rytkönen, Seppo
Format: Article in Journal/Newspaper
Language:English
Published: Wiley 2003
Subjects:
Online Access:http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.0906-7590.2003.03576.x
https://api.wiley.com/onlinelibrary/tdm/v1/articles/10.1111%2Fj.0906-7590.2003.03576.x
https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111/j.0906-7590.2003.03576.x
id crwiley:10.1111/j.0906-7590.2003.03576.x
record_format openpolar
spelling crwiley:10.1111/j.0906-7590.2003.03576.x 2024-06-23T07:45:39+00:00 Diet selection of lesser white‐fronted geese Anser erythropus at a spring staging area Markkola, Juha Niemelä, Marika Rytkönen, Seppo 2003 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.0906-7590.2003.03576.x https://api.wiley.com/onlinelibrary/tdm/v1/articles/10.1111%2Fj.0906-7590.2003.03576.x https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111/j.0906-7590.2003.03576.x en eng Wiley http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/termsAndConditions#vor Ecography volume 26, issue 6, page 705-714 ISSN 0906-7590 1600-0587 journal-article 2003 crwiley https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0906-7590.2003.03576.x 2024-06-13T04:23:45Z We studied diet selection of the globally threatened lesser white‐fronted goose Anser eythropus at a spring staging area on the island of Hailuoto (64°00′N, 24°45′E), off the western coast of Finland. We determined the diet using droppings, which were collected in late May, when the geese had left the area and migrated northwards. The sample potentially comprised of ejecta from 31 different individuals. Plant idengification was based on visual determination of epidermal fragments. A total of 100 droppings were sampled using a point quadrat method. We calculated the percentage of each idengified taxon in each dropping and related this to the availability of the corresponding taxon in the meadow. We measured preference for each taxon using Chesson's electivity index (ɛ i ) and tested them by bootstrap resampling. The diet contained 9 taxa of the ca 40 available. Almost all dietary items were Monocotyledons (99.9%), mostly grasses (88.7%) including Festuca rubra (43%), Phragmites australis (30%) and Calamagrostis stricta (13%). Only Phragmites (ɛ=0.73, p=0.000), Festuca (ɛ=0.52, p=0.004) and possibly Triglochin palustris (ɛ=0.70, p=0.125) were preferred, all other species were avoided. All preferred species were quite common and other goose species exploit them too. The lesser white‐fronted geese preferred large natural meadows that were five times broader than an “average” Bothnian Bay meadow. All forms of mowing and grazing management benefit the restoration of lesser white‐fronted goose habitats at the landscape level. Festuca and especially Triglochin benefit from such management. Reeds, Phragmites , whose spread has been the main cause of coastal meadow deterioration, can be controlled by management, but can also be maintained among other vegetation if mowing is less frequent or grazing not too intensive. Article in Journal/Newspaper Anser erythropus lesser white-fronted goose Wiley Online Library Ecography 26 6 705 714
institution Open Polar
collection Wiley Online Library
op_collection_id crwiley
language English
description We studied diet selection of the globally threatened lesser white‐fronted goose Anser eythropus at a spring staging area on the island of Hailuoto (64°00′N, 24°45′E), off the western coast of Finland. We determined the diet using droppings, which were collected in late May, when the geese had left the area and migrated northwards. The sample potentially comprised of ejecta from 31 different individuals. Plant idengification was based on visual determination of epidermal fragments. A total of 100 droppings were sampled using a point quadrat method. We calculated the percentage of each idengified taxon in each dropping and related this to the availability of the corresponding taxon in the meadow. We measured preference for each taxon using Chesson's electivity index (ɛ i ) and tested them by bootstrap resampling. The diet contained 9 taxa of the ca 40 available. Almost all dietary items were Monocotyledons (99.9%), mostly grasses (88.7%) including Festuca rubra (43%), Phragmites australis (30%) and Calamagrostis stricta (13%). Only Phragmites (ɛ=0.73, p=0.000), Festuca (ɛ=0.52, p=0.004) and possibly Triglochin palustris (ɛ=0.70, p=0.125) were preferred, all other species were avoided. All preferred species were quite common and other goose species exploit them too. The lesser white‐fronted geese preferred large natural meadows that were five times broader than an “average” Bothnian Bay meadow. All forms of mowing and grazing management benefit the restoration of lesser white‐fronted goose habitats at the landscape level. Festuca and especially Triglochin benefit from such management. Reeds, Phragmites , whose spread has been the main cause of coastal meadow deterioration, can be controlled by management, but can also be maintained among other vegetation if mowing is less frequent or grazing not too intensive.
format Article in Journal/Newspaper
author Markkola, Juha
Niemelä, Marika
Rytkönen, Seppo
spellingShingle Markkola, Juha
Niemelä, Marika
Rytkönen, Seppo
Diet selection of lesser white‐fronted geese Anser erythropus at a spring staging area
author_facet Markkola, Juha
Niemelä, Marika
Rytkönen, Seppo
author_sort Markkola, Juha
title Diet selection of lesser white‐fronted geese Anser erythropus at a spring staging area
title_short Diet selection of lesser white‐fronted geese Anser erythropus at a spring staging area
title_full Diet selection of lesser white‐fronted geese Anser erythropus at a spring staging area
title_fullStr Diet selection of lesser white‐fronted geese Anser erythropus at a spring staging area
title_full_unstemmed Diet selection of lesser white‐fronted geese Anser erythropus at a spring staging area
title_sort diet selection of lesser white‐fronted geese anser erythropus at a spring staging area
publisher Wiley
publishDate 2003
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.0906-7590.2003.03576.x
https://api.wiley.com/onlinelibrary/tdm/v1/articles/10.1111%2Fj.0906-7590.2003.03576.x
https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111/j.0906-7590.2003.03576.x
genre Anser erythropus
lesser white-fronted goose
genre_facet Anser erythropus
lesser white-fronted goose
op_source Ecography
volume 26, issue 6, page 705-714
ISSN 0906-7590 1600-0587
op_rights http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/termsAndConditions#vor
op_doi https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0906-7590.2003.03576.x
container_title Ecography
container_volume 26
container_issue 6
container_start_page 705
op_container_end_page 714
_version_ 1802641823347245056