Molecular taxonomy and phylogeny of the ‘living fossil’ lineages Triops and Lepidurus (Branchiopoda: Notostraca)

• Published in: Zoologica Scripta
• Main Authors: Mantovani, Barbara, Cesari, Michele, Scanabissi, Franca
• Format: Article in Journal/Newspaper
• Language: English
• Published: Wiley 2004
• Subjects: Apus apus; Iceland
• Online Access: http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.0300-3256.2004.00155.x; https://api.wiley.com/onlinelibrary/tdm/v1/articles/10.1111%2Fj.0300-3256.2004.00155.x; https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111/j.0300-3256.2004.00155.x

Mantovani B. Cesari M. & Scanabissi F. (2004). Molecular taxonomy and phylogeny of the ‘living fossil’ lineages Triops and Lepidurus (Branchiopoda: Notostraca). — Zoologica Scripta , 33 , 367–374. European Triops cancriformis and Lepidurus apus were analysed for 12S and 16S mitochondrial genes and compared to North American and Japanese taxa. There are no cryptic species among European T. cancriformis populations , which are highly homogeneous in comparison to conspecific Japanese samples. T. cancriformis differs from congeneric taxa all over its range, which can be explained by its antiquity. In contrast, the parapatric subspecies L. apus apus and L. apus lubbocki are morphologically conserved and differ substantially at the mtDNA level. The genetic distance values between them are of the same order of magnitude as those observed between American Lepidurus species. Their subspecific status therefore requires further analysis. L. apus apus is more closely related to a L. arcticus sample from Iceland than to L. apus lubbocki . It is also related to a Canadian L. couesii population. Further analyses of populations from the whole range of L. arcticus and the European range of L. couesii are needed to understand the relationships among these notostracan taxa. When considering the two genera, it is clear that Lepidurus is a well supported monophyletic unit, while Triops is polyphyletic, embodying very divergent taxa.