Competition for shelter among over‐wintering signal crayfish and juvenile Atlantic salmon

Three separate effects on refuge use by signal crayfish Pacifastacus leniusculus and Atlantic salmon Salmo salar were examined: (1) the effect on Atlantic salmon of an addition of signal crayfish (doubling the total number of animals), (2) the effect on signal crayfish of an addition of Atlantic sal...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Published in:Journal of Fish Biology
Main Authors: Griffiths, S. W., Collen, P., Armstrong, J. D.
Format: Article in Journal/Newspaper
Language:English
Published: Wiley 2004
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0022-1112.2004.00460.x
https://api.wiley.com/onlinelibrary/tdm/v1/articles/10.1111%2Fj.0022-1112.2004.00460.x
https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111/j.0022-1112.2004.00460.x
_version_ 1821853034551967744
author Griffiths, S. W.
Collen, P.
Armstrong, J. D.
author_facet Griffiths, S. W.
Collen, P.
Armstrong, J. D.
author_sort Griffiths, S. W.
collection Wiley Online Library
container_issue 2
container_start_page 436
container_title Journal of Fish Biology
container_volume 65
description Three separate effects on refuge use by signal crayfish Pacifastacus leniusculus and Atlantic salmon Salmo salar were examined: (1) the effect on Atlantic salmon of an addition of signal crayfish (doubling the total number of animals), (2) the effect on signal crayfish of an addition of Atlantic salmon and (3) intraspecific compared with interspecific competition, compared by holding total density of animals constant and varying the proportion of signal crayfish and Atlantic salmon in trials. Observations were made during winter, when both species are nocturnal. The proportion of Atlantic salmon sheltering was significantly lower in the presence than in the absence of signal crayfish when the interspecific treatment (Atlantic salmon plus signal crayfish) effected a doubling in density compared to the intraspecific treatment (Atlantic salmon alone). The proportion of signal crayfish sheltering was independent of the presence of Atlantic salmon. When total density was constant, the proportion of Atlantic salmon sheltering was significantly higher in intraspecific (52·8%) than interspecific trials (27·3%). Atlantic salmon out of shelter during the day in winter are believed to be very vulnerable to predators and the capacity for fish to share shelters with one another is known to be very low. Therefore, competition from crayfish for winter shelters may lead to detrimental effects on Atlantic salmon populations.
format Article in Journal/Newspaper
genre Atlantic salmon
Salmo salar
genre_facet Atlantic salmon
Salmo salar
id crwiley:10.1111/j.0022-1112.2004.00460.x
institution Open Polar
language English
op_collection_id crwiley
op_container_end_page 447
op_doi https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0022-1112.2004.00460.x
op_rights http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/termsAndConditions#vor
op_source Journal of Fish Biology
volume 65, issue 2, page 436-447
ISSN 0022-1112 1095-8649
publishDate 2004
publisher Wiley
record_format openpolar
spelling crwiley:10.1111/j.0022-1112.2004.00460.x 2025-01-16T20:59:09+00:00 Competition for shelter among over‐wintering signal crayfish and juvenile Atlantic salmon Griffiths, S. W. Collen, P. Armstrong, J. D. 2004 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0022-1112.2004.00460.x https://api.wiley.com/onlinelibrary/tdm/v1/articles/10.1111%2Fj.0022-1112.2004.00460.x https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111/j.0022-1112.2004.00460.x en eng Wiley http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/termsAndConditions#vor Journal of Fish Biology volume 65, issue 2, page 436-447 ISSN 0022-1112 1095-8649 journal-article 2004 crwiley https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0022-1112.2004.00460.x 2024-12-09T19:47:02Z Three separate effects on refuge use by signal crayfish Pacifastacus leniusculus and Atlantic salmon Salmo salar were examined: (1) the effect on Atlantic salmon of an addition of signal crayfish (doubling the total number of animals), (2) the effect on signal crayfish of an addition of Atlantic salmon and (3) intraspecific compared with interspecific competition, compared by holding total density of animals constant and varying the proportion of signal crayfish and Atlantic salmon in trials. Observations were made during winter, when both species are nocturnal. The proportion of Atlantic salmon sheltering was significantly lower in the presence than in the absence of signal crayfish when the interspecific treatment (Atlantic salmon plus signal crayfish) effected a doubling in density compared to the intraspecific treatment (Atlantic salmon alone). The proportion of signal crayfish sheltering was independent of the presence of Atlantic salmon. When total density was constant, the proportion of Atlantic salmon sheltering was significantly higher in intraspecific (52·8%) than interspecific trials (27·3%). Atlantic salmon out of shelter during the day in winter are believed to be very vulnerable to predators and the capacity for fish to share shelters with one another is known to be very low. Therefore, competition from crayfish for winter shelters may lead to detrimental effects on Atlantic salmon populations. Article in Journal/Newspaper Atlantic salmon Salmo salar Wiley Online Library Journal of Fish Biology 65 2 436 447
spellingShingle Griffiths, S. W.
Collen, P.
Armstrong, J. D.
Competition for shelter among over‐wintering signal crayfish and juvenile Atlantic salmon
title Competition for shelter among over‐wintering signal crayfish and juvenile Atlantic salmon
title_full Competition for shelter among over‐wintering signal crayfish and juvenile Atlantic salmon
title_fullStr Competition for shelter among over‐wintering signal crayfish and juvenile Atlantic salmon
title_full_unstemmed Competition for shelter among over‐wintering signal crayfish and juvenile Atlantic salmon
title_short Competition for shelter among over‐wintering signal crayfish and juvenile Atlantic salmon
title_sort competition for shelter among over‐wintering signal crayfish and juvenile atlantic salmon
url https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0022-1112.2004.00460.x
https://api.wiley.com/onlinelibrary/tdm/v1/articles/10.1111%2Fj.0022-1112.2004.00460.x
https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111/j.0022-1112.2004.00460.x