New managerialism in the academy: Gender bias and precarity

• Published in: Gender, Work & Organization
• Main Authors: Steinþórsdóttir, Finnborg S., Brorsen Smidt, Thomas, Pétursdóttir, Gyða M., Einarsdóttir, Þorgerður, Le Feuvre, Nicky
• Format: Article in Journal/Newspaper
• Language: English
• Published: Wiley 2018
• Subjects: Iceland
• Online Access: http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/gwao.12286; https://api.wiley.com/onlinelibrary/tdm/v1/articles/10.1111%2Fgwao.12286; https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111/gwao.12286

In the era of global competition, academic institutions are increasingly being managed as efficient organizations where early career academics are the most vulnerable group in the academic hierarchy. We use gender budgeting to deconstruct the financial and managerial processes and procedures in a selected academic institution in Iceland. Drawing on multiple data collection methods, we argue that new managerialism enhances the precarious position of early career academics, especially women and those in the more feminized fields. Furthermore, we show that the system's bias in favour of so‐called hard science generates gendered consequences for early career academics. We demonstrate this structural gender bias in each of the first three stages of an academic career: PhD, postdoc and other temporary positions, and assistant professorship. By highlighting the gendered consequences of new managerialism, we want to direct attention to the need to include a gender perspective in the budgeting and all the decision‐making processes in academic institutions.