Substantial non‐growing season carbon dioxide loss across Tibetan alpine permafrost region

Abstract One of the major uncertainties for projecting permafrost carbon (C)‐climate feedback is a poor representation of the non‐growing season carbon dioxide (CO 2 ) emissions under a changing climate. Here, combining in situ field observations, regional synthesis and a random forest model, we ass...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Published in:Global Change Biology
Main Authors: Li, Qinlu, Liu, Yang, Kou, Dan, Peng, Yunfeng, Yang, Yuanhe
Other Authors: Chinese Academy of Sciences, National Natural Science Foundation of China, Youth Innovation Promotion Association of the Chinese Academy of Sciences
Format: Article in Journal/Newspaper
Language:English
Published: Wiley 2022
Subjects:
Online Access:http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/gcb.16315
https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111/gcb.16315
https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full-xml/10.1111/gcb.16315
id crwiley:10.1111/gcb.16315
record_format openpolar
spelling crwiley:10.1111/gcb.16315 2024-06-23T07:50:11+00:00 Substantial non‐growing season carbon dioxide loss across Tibetan alpine permafrost region Li, Qinlu Liu, Yang Kou, Dan Peng, Yunfeng Yang, Yuanhe Chinese Academy of Sciences National Natural Science Foundation of China Youth Innovation Promotion Association of the Chinese Academy of Sciences 2022 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/gcb.16315 https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111/gcb.16315 https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full-xml/10.1111/gcb.16315 en eng Wiley http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/termsAndConditions#vor Global Change Biology volume 28, issue 17, page 5200-5210 ISSN 1354-1013 1365-2486 journal-article 2022 crwiley https://doi.org/10.1111/gcb.16315 2024-06-04T06:48:27Z Abstract One of the major uncertainties for projecting permafrost carbon (C)‐climate feedback is a poor representation of the non‐growing season carbon dioxide (CO 2 ) emissions under a changing climate. Here, combining in situ field observations, regional synthesis and a random forest model, we assessed contemporary and future soil respired CO 2 (i.e., soil respiration, R s ) across the Tibetan alpine permafrost region, which has received much less attention compared with the Arctic permafrost domain. We estimated the regional mean R s of 229.8, 72.9 and 302.7 g C m −2 year −1 during growing season, non‐growing season and the entire year, respectively; corresponding to the contemporary losses of 296.9, 94.3 and 391.2 Tg C year −1 from this high‐altitude permafrost‐affected area. The non‐growing season R s accounted for a quarter of the annual soil CO 2 efflux. Different from the prevailing view that temperature is the most limiting factor for cold‐period CO 2 release in Arctic permafrost ecosystems, precipitation determined the spatial pattern of non‐growing season R s on the Tibetan Plateau. Using the key predictors, model extrapolation demonstrated additional losses of 38.8 and 74.5 Tg C from the non‐growing season for a moderate mitigation scenario and a business‐as‐usual emissions scenario, respectively. These results provide a baseline for non‐growing season CO 2 emissions from high‐altitude permafrost areas and help for accurate projection of permafrost C‐climate feedback. Article in Journal/Newspaper Arctic permafrost Wiley Online Library Arctic Global Change Biology 28 17 5200 5210
institution Open Polar
collection Wiley Online Library
op_collection_id crwiley
language English
description Abstract One of the major uncertainties for projecting permafrost carbon (C)‐climate feedback is a poor representation of the non‐growing season carbon dioxide (CO 2 ) emissions under a changing climate. Here, combining in situ field observations, regional synthesis and a random forest model, we assessed contemporary and future soil respired CO 2 (i.e., soil respiration, R s ) across the Tibetan alpine permafrost region, which has received much less attention compared with the Arctic permafrost domain. We estimated the regional mean R s of 229.8, 72.9 and 302.7 g C m −2 year −1 during growing season, non‐growing season and the entire year, respectively; corresponding to the contemporary losses of 296.9, 94.3 and 391.2 Tg C year −1 from this high‐altitude permafrost‐affected area. The non‐growing season R s accounted for a quarter of the annual soil CO 2 efflux. Different from the prevailing view that temperature is the most limiting factor for cold‐period CO 2 release in Arctic permafrost ecosystems, precipitation determined the spatial pattern of non‐growing season R s on the Tibetan Plateau. Using the key predictors, model extrapolation demonstrated additional losses of 38.8 and 74.5 Tg C from the non‐growing season for a moderate mitigation scenario and a business‐as‐usual emissions scenario, respectively. These results provide a baseline for non‐growing season CO 2 emissions from high‐altitude permafrost areas and help for accurate projection of permafrost C‐climate feedback.
author2 Chinese Academy of Sciences
National Natural Science Foundation of China
Youth Innovation Promotion Association of the Chinese Academy of Sciences
format Article in Journal/Newspaper
author Li, Qinlu
Liu, Yang
Kou, Dan
Peng, Yunfeng
Yang, Yuanhe
spellingShingle Li, Qinlu
Liu, Yang
Kou, Dan
Peng, Yunfeng
Yang, Yuanhe
Substantial non‐growing season carbon dioxide loss across Tibetan alpine permafrost region
author_facet Li, Qinlu
Liu, Yang
Kou, Dan
Peng, Yunfeng
Yang, Yuanhe
author_sort Li, Qinlu
title Substantial non‐growing season carbon dioxide loss across Tibetan alpine permafrost region
title_short Substantial non‐growing season carbon dioxide loss across Tibetan alpine permafrost region
title_full Substantial non‐growing season carbon dioxide loss across Tibetan alpine permafrost region
title_fullStr Substantial non‐growing season carbon dioxide loss across Tibetan alpine permafrost region
title_full_unstemmed Substantial non‐growing season carbon dioxide loss across Tibetan alpine permafrost region
title_sort substantial non‐growing season carbon dioxide loss across tibetan alpine permafrost region
publisher Wiley
publishDate 2022
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/gcb.16315
https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111/gcb.16315
https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full-xml/10.1111/gcb.16315
geographic Arctic
geographic_facet Arctic
genre Arctic
permafrost
genre_facet Arctic
permafrost
op_source Global Change Biology
volume 28, issue 17, page 5200-5210
ISSN 1354-1013 1365-2486
op_rights http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/termsAndConditions#vor
op_doi https://doi.org/10.1111/gcb.16315
container_title Global Change Biology
container_volume 28
container_issue 17
container_start_page 5200
op_container_end_page 5210
_version_ 1802641056479576064