Assessing biogeographic survey gaps in bacterial diversity knowledge: A global synthesis of freshwaters

Abstract Freshwaters account for 0.8% of Earth's surface area, yet support >10% of known plant and animal species making them disproportionately biodiverse. Modern molecular techniques have begun to reveal microbial diversity, but application of these approaches to address global microbial b...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Published in:Freshwater Biology
Main Authors: Veach, Allison M., Troia, Matthew J., Cregger, Melissa A.
Format: Article in Journal/Newspaper
Language:English
Published: Wiley 2021
Subjects:
Online Access:http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/fwb.13777
https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111/fwb.13777
https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full-xml/10.1111/fwb.13777
id crwiley:10.1111/fwb.13777
record_format openpolar
spelling crwiley:10.1111/fwb.13777 2024-06-02T07:56:57+00:00 Assessing biogeographic survey gaps in bacterial diversity knowledge: A global synthesis of freshwaters Veach, Allison M. Troia, Matthew J. Cregger, Melissa A. 2021 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/fwb.13777 https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111/fwb.13777 https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full-xml/10.1111/fwb.13777 en eng Wiley http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/termsAndConditions#vor Freshwater Biology volume 66, issue 8, page 1595-1605 ISSN 0046-5070 1365-2427 journal-article 2021 crwiley https://doi.org/10.1111/fwb.13777 2024-05-03T10:54:39Z Abstract Freshwaters account for 0.8% of Earth's surface area, yet support >10% of known plant and animal species making them disproportionately biodiverse. Modern molecular techniques have begun to reveal microbial diversity, but application of these approaches to address global microbial biogeography is relatively unknown in freshwaters. Our aim was to identify gaps in microbial data coverage along climatic and landscape disturbance gradients and among terrestrial biomes and hydrographic regions for all freshwater ecosystems and three freshwater habitat types: lakes and reservoirs (lentic); streams and rivers (lotic); and wetlands. We reviewed literature on microbial diversity in freshwaters surveyed using 16S ribosomal RNA sequencing which identify microbial taxa. We georeferenced survey locations and used a geographic information system to identify and map gaps in survey coverage using open‐source data for climate, landscape disturbance, terrestrial biomes, and freshwater ecoregions. We compiled 3,425 georeferenced survey locations reported from 963 studies. Streams were surveyed most frequently (60.8% of survey locations), followed by lakes (33.5%) and wetlands (5.6%). Surveys were concentrated in North America, central and western Europe, and Southeast Asia; 35% of freshwater ecoregions were surveyed at least once across freshwater habitat types, whereas 23%, 23%, and 12% were surveyed at least once for lentic, lotic, and wetland habitat types, respectively. The climatic gap analysis indicated coverage is high for temperate regions but lacking in the tropics and Arctic, particularly for wetland ecosystems. Our assessment revealed high climatic coverage of freshwater microbial diversity knowledge, but expansive ecoregional gaps attributable to biased sampling near research institutions in North America, western Europe, and China. Future surveys should target ecoregions in Africa, South America, Central Asia, Australia, and Antarctica. An essential next step will be to curate and disseminate sequencing ... Article in Journal/Newspaper Antarc* Antarctica Arctic Wiley Online Library Arctic Freshwater Biology 66 8 1595 1605
institution Open Polar
collection Wiley Online Library
op_collection_id crwiley
language English
description Abstract Freshwaters account for 0.8% of Earth's surface area, yet support >10% of known plant and animal species making them disproportionately biodiverse. Modern molecular techniques have begun to reveal microbial diversity, but application of these approaches to address global microbial biogeography is relatively unknown in freshwaters. Our aim was to identify gaps in microbial data coverage along climatic and landscape disturbance gradients and among terrestrial biomes and hydrographic regions for all freshwater ecosystems and three freshwater habitat types: lakes and reservoirs (lentic); streams and rivers (lotic); and wetlands. We reviewed literature on microbial diversity in freshwaters surveyed using 16S ribosomal RNA sequencing which identify microbial taxa. We georeferenced survey locations and used a geographic information system to identify and map gaps in survey coverage using open‐source data for climate, landscape disturbance, terrestrial biomes, and freshwater ecoregions. We compiled 3,425 georeferenced survey locations reported from 963 studies. Streams were surveyed most frequently (60.8% of survey locations), followed by lakes (33.5%) and wetlands (5.6%). Surveys were concentrated in North America, central and western Europe, and Southeast Asia; 35% of freshwater ecoregions were surveyed at least once across freshwater habitat types, whereas 23%, 23%, and 12% were surveyed at least once for lentic, lotic, and wetland habitat types, respectively. The climatic gap analysis indicated coverage is high for temperate regions but lacking in the tropics and Arctic, particularly for wetland ecosystems. Our assessment revealed high climatic coverage of freshwater microbial diversity knowledge, but expansive ecoregional gaps attributable to biased sampling near research institutions in North America, western Europe, and China. Future surveys should target ecoregions in Africa, South America, Central Asia, Australia, and Antarctica. An essential next step will be to curate and disseminate sequencing ...
format Article in Journal/Newspaper
author Veach, Allison M.
Troia, Matthew J.
Cregger, Melissa A.
spellingShingle Veach, Allison M.
Troia, Matthew J.
Cregger, Melissa A.
Assessing biogeographic survey gaps in bacterial diversity knowledge: A global synthesis of freshwaters
author_facet Veach, Allison M.
Troia, Matthew J.
Cregger, Melissa A.
author_sort Veach, Allison M.
title Assessing biogeographic survey gaps in bacterial diversity knowledge: A global synthesis of freshwaters
title_short Assessing biogeographic survey gaps in bacterial diversity knowledge: A global synthesis of freshwaters
title_full Assessing biogeographic survey gaps in bacterial diversity knowledge: A global synthesis of freshwaters
title_fullStr Assessing biogeographic survey gaps in bacterial diversity knowledge: A global synthesis of freshwaters
title_full_unstemmed Assessing biogeographic survey gaps in bacterial diversity knowledge: A global synthesis of freshwaters
title_sort assessing biogeographic survey gaps in bacterial diversity knowledge: a global synthesis of freshwaters
publisher Wiley
publishDate 2021
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/fwb.13777
https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111/fwb.13777
https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full-xml/10.1111/fwb.13777
geographic Arctic
geographic_facet Arctic
genre Antarc*
Antarctica
Arctic
genre_facet Antarc*
Antarctica
Arctic
op_source Freshwater Biology
volume 66, issue 8, page 1595-1605
ISSN 0046-5070 1365-2427
op_rights http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/termsAndConditions#vor
op_doi https://doi.org/10.1111/fwb.13777
container_title Freshwater Biology
container_volume 66
container_issue 8
container_start_page 1595
op_container_end_page 1605
_version_ 1800737224475541504