Conservation of spawning time between years in lumpfish Cyclopterus lumpus and potential impacts from the temporal distribution of fishing effort

• Published in: Fisheries Management and Ecology
• Main Authors: Kennedy, James, Ólafsson, Halldór G.
• Other Authors: Biopol, Verkefnasjóður sjávarútvegsins á samkeppnissviði, Marine and Freshwater Research Institute
• Format: Article in Journal/Newspaper
• Language: English
• Published: Wiley 2019
• Subjects: Iceland
• Online Access: http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/fme.12352; https://api.wiley.com/onlinelibrary/tdm/v1/articles/10.1111%2Ffme.12352; https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111/fme.12352; https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full-xml/10.1111/fme.12352

Abstract Lumpfish, Cyclopterus lumpus L., has an extended ovary development period and a relatively long spawning season. It therefore seems unlikely that individuals spawning later in the season would be able to recover from spawning and develop their gonads in time to spawn during the early part of the season the following year. The hypothesis that individuals spawning early or late in a spawning season would spawn early or late the following year was tested using fish tagged in Iceland between 2008 and 2017. The tagging date and recapture date the following year were positively correlated with an average of 356 days at large ( DAL ). Fish sampled from the fishery indicate that tagging/recapture date gives an indication of spawning time. From this, it was concluded that spawning time in the current year can be used to predict spawning time the following year. As fishing effort was greatest at the end of April/beginning of May, it seems likely that fish that come to spawn at this time will be subject to a higher fishing mortality. Therefore, they will be less likely to spawn successfully than fish spawning earlier or later in the year. If spawning time is under genetic control, then this could have consequences for the spawning phenology of lumpfish.