Short‐term Costs and Benefits of Habitat Complexity for a Territorial Fish

Abstract An increase in habitat complexity is thought to decrease visibility and the territory size of visually oriented animals. Hence, the addition of physical structure has been viewed as a useful restoration technique to increase the density of territorial species, particularly in stream fishes....

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Published in:Ethology
Main Authors: Bilhete, Caroline, Grant, James W.A.
Other Authors: Ebensperger, L., Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
Format: Article in Journal/Newspaper
Language:English
Published: Wiley 2015
Subjects:
Online Access:http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/eth.12456
https://api.wiley.com/onlinelibrary/tdm/v1/articles/10.1111%2Feth.12456
https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111/eth.12456
id crwiley:10.1111/eth.12456
record_format openpolar
spelling crwiley:10.1111/eth.12456 2024-09-15T17:56:29+00:00 Short‐term Costs and Benefits of Habitat Complexity for a Territorial Fish Bilhete, Caroline Grant, James W.A. Ebensperger, L. Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada 2015 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/eth.12456 https://api.wiley.com/onlinelibrary/tdm/v1/articles/10.1111%2Feth.12456 https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111/eth.12456 en eng Wiley http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/termsAndConditions#vor Ethology volume 122, issue 2, page 151-157 ISSN 0179-1613 1439-0310 journal-article 2015 crwiley https://doi.org/10.1111/eth.12456 2024-08-01T04:22:04Z Abstract An increase in habitat complexity is thought to decrease visibility and the territory size of visually oriented animals. Hence, the addition of physical structure has been viewed as a useful restoration technique to increase the density of territorial species, particularly in stream fishes. However, a decrease in territory size may have a negative effect on the fitness of individual organisms. We attempted to quantify some of the positive and negative effects of increasing habitat structure on the behaviour and growth rate of wild young‐of‐the‐year ( YOY ) Atlantic salmon. Fish were exposed to one of two habitat treatments in mesh enclosures in Catamaran Brook, New Brunswick: a gravel substrate (low complexity) or a gravel substrate with boulders added (high complexity). Wild‐caught individuals were tagged, weighed and measured before being stocked at densities of 1·m −2 for 7‐d trials. While fish from high‐complexity treatments benefited from lower rates of aggression, they also had lower foraging rates and smaller territories compared to those in low‐complexity treatments. Specific growth rate, however, did not differ significantly between treatments. While the addition of structure to a habitat may be beneficial at the population level in terms of an increase in population density, our results suggested that individual fish may pay some short‐term costs in these environments. Further research is needed to evaluate the longer term costs and benefits of adding structure to improve the habitat quality for stream salmonids. Article in Journal/Newspaper Atlantic salmon Wiley Online Library Ethology 122 2 151 157
institution Open Polar
collection Wiley Online Library
op_collection_id crwiley
language English
description Abstract An increase in habitat complexity is thought to decrease visibility and the territory size of visually oriented animals. Hence, the addition of physical structure has been viewed as a useful restoration technique to increase the density of territorial species, particularly in stream fishes. However, a decrease in territory size may have a negative effect on the fitness of individual organisms. We attempted to quantify some of the positive and negative effects of increasing habitat structure on the behaviour and growth rate of wild young‐of‐the‐year ( YOY ) Atlantic salmon. Fish were exposed to one of two habitat treatments in mesh enclosures in Catamaran Brook, New Brunswick: a gravel substrate (low complexity) or a gravel substrate with boulders added (high complexity). Wild‐caught individuals were tagged, weighed and measured before being stocked at densities of 1·m −2 for 7‐d trials. While fish from high‐complexity treatments benefited from lower rates of aggression, they also had lower foraging rates and smaller territories compared to those in low‐complexity treatments. Specific growth rate, however, did not differ significantly between treatments. While the addition of structure to a habitat may be beneficial at the population level in terms of an increase in population density, our results suggested that individual fish may pay some short‐term costs in these environments. Further research is needed to evaluate the longer term costs and benefits of adding structure to improve the habitat quality for stream salmonids.
author2 Ebensperger, L.
Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
format Article in Journal/Newspaper
author Bilhete, Caroline
Grant, James W.A.
spellingShingle Bilhete, Caroline
Grant, James W.A.
Short‐term Costs and Benefits of Habitat Complexity for a Territorial Fish
author_facet Bilhete, Caroline
Grant, James W.A.
author_sort Bilhete, Caroline
title Short‐term Costs and Benefits of Habitat Complexity for a Territorial Fish
title_short Short‐term Costs and Benefits of Habitat Complexity for a Territorial Fish
title_full Short‐term Costs and Benefits of Habitat Complexity for a Territorial Fish
title_fullStr Short‐term Costs and Benefits of Habitat Complexity for a Territorial Fish
title_full_unstemmed Short‐term Costs and Benefits of Habitat Complexity for a Territorial Fish
title_sort short‐term costs and benefits of habitat complexity for a territorial fish
publisher Wiley
publishDate 2015
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/eth.12456
https://api.wiley.com/onlinelibrary/tdm/v1/articles/10.1111%2Feth.12456
https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111/eth.12456
genre Atlantic salmon
genre_facet Atlantic salmon
op_source Ethology
volume 122, issue 2, page 151-157
ISSN 0179-1613 1439-0310
op_rights http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/termsAndConditions#vor
op_doi https://doi.org/10.1111/eth.12456
container_title Ethology
container_volume 122
container_issue 2
container_start_page 151
op_container_end_page 157
_version_ 1810432690525044736