Evaluating intraspecific variation in insect trait analysis

Intraspecific variation plays important roles in ecology and evolution. Yet, information on how species and populations vary remains scarce, particularly for insects and regarding functional traits. This lack of knowledge can be problematic in trait‐based ecology because traditional approaches assum...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Published in:Ecological Entomology
Main Authors: Gentile, Giorgio, Bonelli, Simona, Riva, Federico
Format: Article in Journal/Newspaper
Language:English
Published: Wiley 2020
Subjects:
Online Access:http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/een.12984
https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111/een.12984
https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full-xml/10.1111/een.12984
id crwiley:10.1111/een.12984
record_format openpolar
spelling crwiley:10.1111/een.12984 2024-06-02T08:01:28+00:00 Evaluating intraspecific variation in insect trait analysis Gentile, Giorgio Bonelli, Simona Riva, Federico 2020 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/een.12984 https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111/een.12984 https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full-xml/10.1111/een.12984 en eng Wiley http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/termsAndConditions#vor Ecological Entomology volume 46, issue 1, page 11-18 ISSN 0307-6946 1365-2311 journal-article 2020 crwiley https://doi.org/10.1111/een.12984 2024-05-03T10:52:56Z Intraspecific variation plays important roles in ecology and evolution. Yet, information on how species and populations vary remains scarce, particularly for insects and regarding functional traits. This lack of knowledge can be problematic in trait‐based ecology because traditional approaches assume negligible intraspecific variation, even for analyses that assess highly variable taxa. We measured 291 Arctic fritillary butterflies ( Boloria chariclea ) to assess the intraspecific variation in one population of this species, evaluating (i) how wingspan of Arctic fritillaries varies in relation to the other species of its community, and (ii) how well wingspan, a measure of body size, predicts weight, a measure of body mass. Wingspan of Arctic fritillaries varied between 2.62 and 4.07 cm, with the 95% interval range, including ∼33% (14/42) of the species in the community, and ∼30% (84/279) of the butterflies of Canada. The relationship between wingspan and weight was significant ( β wingspan = 0.002, SE = 0.0008, P < 0.001), but relatively weak ( R 2 adj = 0.31, F 2,288 = 67.82, P < 0.001). We discuss our findings in relation to the assumption of species homogeneity and the use of proxies in the analysis of species traits, complementing our case study with simulations to illustrate how intraspecific and interspecific variation interact in determining when traditional trait analyses are robust. We suggest entomologists interested in trait analyses should critically evaluate how intraspecific variation could affect their inference, especially when evaluating species that are highly sexually dimorphic, phenotypically plastic, and/or distributed across broad environmental and spatial clines. Article in Journal/Newspaper Arctic Wiley Online Library Arctic Canada Ecological Entomology 46 1 11 18
institution Open Polar
collection Wiley Online Library
op_collection_id crwiley
language English
description Intraspecific variation plays important roles in ecology and evolution. Yet, information on how species and populations vary remains scarce, particularly for insects and regarding functional traits. This lack of knowledge can be problematic in trait‐based ecology because traditional approaches assume negligible intraspecific variation, even for analyses that assess highly variable taxa. We measured 291 Arctic fritillary butterflies ( Boloria chariclea ) to assess the intraspecific variation in one population of this species, evaluating (i) how wingspan of Arctic fritillaries varies in relation to the other species of its community, and (ii) how well wingspan, a measure of body size, predicts weight, a measure of body mass. Wingspan of Arctic fritillaries varied between 2.62 and 4.07 cm, with the 95% interval range, including ∼33% (14/42) of the species in the community, and ∼30% (84/279) of the butterflies of Canada. The relationship between wingspan and weight was significant ( β wingspan = 0.002, SE = 0.0008, P < 0.001), but relatively weak ( R 2 adj = 0.31, F 2,288 = 67.82, P < 0.001). We discuss our findings in relation to the assumption of species homogeneity and the use of proxies in the analysis of species traits, complementing our case study with simulations to illustrate how intraspecific and interspecific variation interact in determining when traditional trait analyses are robust. We suggest entomologists interested in trait analyses should critically evaluate how intraspecific variation could affect their inference, especially when evaluating species that are highly sexually dimorphic, phenotypically plastic, and/or distributed across broad environmental and spatial clines.
format Article in Journal/Newspaper
author Gentile, Giorgio
Bonelli, Simona
Riva, Federico
spellingShingle Gentile, Giorgio
Bonelli, Simona
Riva, Federico
Evaluating intraspecific variation in insect trait analysis
author_facet Gentile, Giorgio
Bonelli, Simona
Riva, Federico
author_sort Gentile, Giorgio
title Evaluating intraspecific variation in insect trait analysis
title_short Evaluating intraspecific variation in insect trait analysis
title_full Evaluating intraspecific variation in insect trait analysis
title_fullStr Evaluating intraspecific variation in insect trait analysis
title_full_unstemmed Evaluating intraspecific variation in insect trait analysis
title_sort evaluating intraspecific variation in insect trait analysis
publisher Wiley
publishDate 2020
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/een.12984
https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111/een.12984
https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full-xml/10.1111/een.12984
geographic Arctic
Canada
geographic_facet Arctic
Canada
genre Arctic
genre_facet Arctic
op_source Ecological Entomology
volume 46, issue 1, page 11-18
ISSN 0307-6946 1365-2311
op_rights http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/termsAndConditions#vor
op_doi https://doi.org/10.1111/een.12984
container_title Ecological Entomology
container_volume 46
container_issue 1
container_start_page 11
op_container_end_page 18
_version_ 1800745847330177024