Caught in the mesh: roads and their network‐scale impediment to animal movement

Roads have a pervasive multi‐faceted influence on ecosystems, including pronounced impacts on wildlife movements. In recognition of the scale‐transcending impacts of transportation infrastructure, ecologists have been encouraged to extend the study of barrier impacts from individual roads and animal...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Published in:Ecography
Main Authors: Bischof, Richard, Steyaert, Sam M. J. G., Kindberg, Jonas
Format: Article in Journal/Newspaper
Language:English
Published: Wiley 2017
Subjects:
Online Access:http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/ecog.02801
https://api.wiley.com/onlinelibrary/tdm/v1/articles/10.1111%2Fecog.02801
https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111/ecog.02801
id crwiley:10.1111/ecog.02801
record_format openpolar
spelling crwiley:10.1111/ecog.02801 2024-06-23T07:57:21+00:00 Caught in the mesh: roads and their network‐scale impediment to animal movement Bischof, Richard Steyaert, Sam M. J. G. Kindberg, Jonas 2017 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/ecog.02801 https://api.wiley.com/onlinelibrary/tdm/v1/articles/10.1111%2Fecog.02801 https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111/ecog.02801 en eng Wiley http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ Ecography volume 40, issue 12, page 1369-1380 ISSN 0906-7590 1600-0587 journal-article 2017 crwiley https://doi.org/10.1111/ecog.02801 2024-05-31T08:10:42Z Roads have a pervasive multi‐faceted influence on ecosystems, including pronounced impacts on wildlife movements. In recognition of the scale‐transcending impacts of transportation infrastructure, ecologists have been encouraged to extend the study of barrier impacts from individual roads and animals to networks and populations. In this study, we adopt an analytical representation of road networks as mosaics of landscape tiles, separated by roads. We then adapt spatial capture–recapture analysis to estimate the propensity of wildlife to stay within the boundaries of the road network tiles (RNTs) that hold their activity centres. We fit the model to national non‐invasive genetic monitoring data for brown bears Ursus arctos in Sweden and show that bears had up to 73% lower odds of using areas outside the network tile of their home range centre, even after accounting for the effect of natural barriers (major rivers) and the decrease in utilization with increasing distance from a bear's activity centre. Our study highlights the pronounced landscape‐level barrier effect on wildlife mobility and, in doing so, introduces a novel and flexible approach for quantifying contemporary fragmentation from the scale of RNTs and individual animals to transportation networks and populations. Article in Journal/Newspaper Ursus arctos Wiley Online Library Ecography 40 12 1369 1380
institution Open Polar
collection Wiley Online Library
op_collection_id crwiley
language English
description Roads have a pervasive multi‐faceted influence on ecosystems, including pronounced impacts on wildlife movements. In recognition of the scale‐transcending impacts of transportation infrastructure, ecologists have been encouraged to extend the study of barrier impacts from individual roads and animals to networks and populations. In this study, we adopt an analytical representation of road networks as mosaics of landscape tiles, separated by roads. We then adapt spatial capture–recapture analysis to estimate the propensity of wildlife to stay within the boundaries of the road network tiles (RNTs) that hold their activity centres. We fit the model to national non‐invasive genetic monitoring data for brown bears Ursus arctos in Sweden and show that bears had up to 73% lower odds of using areas outside the network tile of their home range centre, even after accounting for the effect of natural barriers (major rivers) and the decrease in utilization with increasing distance from a bear's activity centre. Our study highlights the pronounced landscape‐level barrier effect on wildlife mobility and, in doing so, introduces a novel and flexible approach for quantifying contemporary fragmentation from the scale of RNTs and individual animals to transportation networks and populations.
format Article in Journal/Newspaper
author Bischof, Richard
Steyaert, Sam M. J. G.
Kindberg, Jonas
spellingShingle Bischof, Richard
Steyaert, Sam M. J. G.
Kindberg, Jonas
Caught in the mesh: roads and their network‐scale impediment to animal movement
author_facet Bischof, Richard
Steyaert, Sam M. J. G.
Kindberg, Jonas
author_sort Bischof, Richard
title Caught in the mesh: roads and their network‐scale impediment to animal movement
title_short Caught in the mesh: roads and their network‐scale impediment to animal movement
title_full Caught in the mesh: roads and their network‐scale impediment to animal movement
title_fullStr Caught in the mesh: roads and their network‐scale impediment to animal movement
title_full_unstemmed Caught in the mesh: roads and their network‐scale impediment to animal movement
title_sort caught in the mesh: roads and their network‐scale impediment to animal movement
publisher Wiley
publishDate 2017
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/ecog.02801
https://api.wiley.com/onlinelibrary/tdm/v1/articles/10.1111%2Fecog.02801
https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111/ecog.02801
genre Ursus arctos
genre_facet Ursus arctos
op_source Ecography
volume 40, issue 12, page 1369-1380
ISSN 0906-7590 1600-0587
op_rights http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/
op_doi https://doi.org/10.1111/ecog.02801
container_title Ecography
container_volume 40
container_issue 12
container_start_page 1369
op_container_end_page 1380
_version_ 1802650961457446912