Risk Assessment of Inbreeding and Outbreeding Depression in a Captive‐Breeding Program

• Published in: Conservation Biology
• Main Authors: ROLLINSON, NJAL, KEITH, DAVE M., HOUDE, AIMEE LEE S., DEBES, PAUL V., MCBRIDE, MEGHAN C., HUTCHINGS, JEFFREY A.
• Other Authors: Killam Trust Memorial Scholarship, NSERC CGS Scholarship, NSERC Discovery grant, NSERC Strategic Grant
• Format: Article in Journal/Newspaper
• Language: English
• Published: Wiley 2014
• Subjects: Atlantic salmon; Salmo salar
• Online Access: http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/cobi.12188; https://api.wiley.com/onlinelibrary/tdm/v1/articles/10.1111%2Fcobi.12188; http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/wol1/doi/10.1111/cobi.12188/fullpdf

Abstract Captive‐breeding programs can be implemented to preserve the genetic diversity of endangered populations such that the controlled release of captive‐bred individuals into the wild may promote recovery. A common difficulty, however, is that programs are founded with limited wild broodstock, and inbreeding can become increasingly difficult to avoid with successive generations in captivity. Program managers must choose between maintaining the genetic purity of populations, at the risk of inbreeding depression, or interbreeding populations, at the risk of outbreeding depression. We evaluate these relative risks in a captive‐breeding program for 3 endangered populations of Atlantic salmon (Salmo salar). In each of 2 years, we released juvenile F 1 and F 2 interpopulation hybrids, backcrosses, as well as inbred and noninbred within‐population crosstypes into 9 wild streams. Juvenile size and survival was quantified in each year. Few crosstype effects were observed, but interestingly, the relative fitness consequences of inbreeding and outbreeding varied from year to year. Temporal variation in environmental quality might have driven some of these annual differences, by exacerbating the importance of maternal effects on juvenile fitness in a year of low environmental quality and by affecting the severity of inbreeding depression differently in different years. Nonetheless, inbreeding was more consistently associated with a negative effect on fitness, whereas the consequences of outbreeding were less predictable. Considering the challenges associated with a sound risk assessment in the wild and given that the effect of inbreeding on fitness is relatively predictable, we suggest that risk can be weighted more strongly in terms of the probable outcome of outbreeding. Factors such as genetic similarities between populations and the number of generations in isolation can sometimes be used to assess outbreeding risk, in lieu of experimentation. Evaluación del Riesgo de Depresión por Endogamia y Exogamia en un ...