Wildlife predation by dogs in Madagascar

Abstract Human–wildlife conflicts are increasing in number and intensity making conflict mitigation and coexistence a top priority for wildlife conservation. Domesticated dogs ( Canis lupus familiaris ) can mitigate or exacerbate human–wildlife conflict leading to positive and negative impacts on bo...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Published in:Biotropica
Main Authors: Merz, Leandra, Kshirsagar, Akhil R., Rafaliarison, Radoniaina R., Rajaonarivelo, Tsiky, Farris, Zach J., Randriana, Zoavina, Valenta, Kim
Format: Article in Journal/Newspaper
Language:English
Published: Wiley 2021
Subjects:
Online Access:http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/btp.13049
https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111/btp.13049
https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full-xml/10.1111/btp.13049
id crwiley:10.1111/btp.13049
record_format openpolar
spelling crwiley:10.1111/btp.13049 2024-06-02T08:05:03+00:00 Wildlife predation by dogs in Madagascar Merz, Leandra Kshirsagar, Akhil R. Rafaliarison, Radoniaina R. Rajaonarivelo, Tsiky Farris, Zach J. Randriana, Zoavina Valenta, Kim 2021 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/btp.13049 https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111/btp.13049 https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full-xml/10.1111/btp.13049 en eng Wiley http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/termsAndConditions#vor Biotropica volume 54, issue 1, page 181-190 ISSN 0006-3606 1744-7429 journal-article 2021 crwiley https://doi.org/10.1111/btp.13049 2024-05-03T11:41:04Z Abstract Human–wildlife conflicts are increasing in number and intensity making conflict mitigation and coexistence a top priority for wildlife conservation. Domesticated dogs ( Canis lupus familiaris ) can mitigate or exacerbate human–wildlife conflict leading to positive and negative impacts on both humans and wildlife. However, the human–dog–wildlife interface is not well understood, particularly in biodiversity hot spots. Madagascar is a tropical biodiversity hot spot with many rare and threatened species of high conservation concern. Here we assess wildlife predation by free‐roaming dogs in communities surrounding Andasibe–Mantadia and Ranomafana National Parks in eastern Madagascar using surveys of dog owners living adjacent to protected areas. Nearly half of survey respondents reported that their dog(s) had killed wildlife. Dogs that spent more time away from home, that traveled to the forest more frequently, that had killed domestic livestock, and that were owned for hunting were more likely to have killed wildlife. Dogs that were fed were approximately 20% less likely to have killed wildlife than dogs that were not fed. Keeping dogs restrained more often and providing food are therefore likely to reduce wildlife predation by dogs provided these are socially acceptable options. Additionally, we found spatial variation in wildlife predation by dogs both between and within our two study regions. These results can help conservation organizations develop targeted, effective interventions appropriately tailored to the local context and prioritize specific areas with higher wildlife predation by dogs. Abstract in French is available with online material. Article in Journal/Newspaper Canis lupus Wiley Online Library Biotropica 54 1 181 190
institution Open Polar
collection Wiley Online Library
op_collection_id crwiley
language English
description Abstract Human–wildlife conflicts are increasing in number and intensity making conflict mitigation and coexistence a top priority for wildlife conservation. Domesticated dogs ( Canis lupus familiaris ) can mitigate or exacerbate human–wildlife conflict leading to positive and negative impacts on both humans and wildlife. However, the human–dog–wildlife interface is not well understood, particularly in biodiversity hot spots. Madagascar is a tropical biodiversity hot spot with many rare and threatened species of high conservation concern. Here we assess wildlife predation by free‐roaming dogs in communities surrounding Andasibe–Mantadia and Ranomafana National Parks in eastern Madagascar using surveys of dog owners living adjacent to protected areas. Nearly half of survey respondents reported that their dog(s) had killed wildlife. Dogs that spent more time away from home, that traveled to the forest more frequently, that had killed domestic livestock, and that were owned for hunting were more likely to have killed wildlife. Dogs that were fed were approximately 20% less likely to have killed wildlife than dogs that were not fed. Keeping dogs restrained more often and providing food are therefore likely to reduce wildlife predation by dogs provided these are socially acceptable options. Additionally, we found spatial variation in wildlife predation by dogs both between and within our two study regions. These results can help conservation organizations develop targeted, effective interventions appropriately tailored to the local context and prioritize specific areas with higher wildlife predation by dogs. Abstract in French is available with online material.
format Article in Journal/Newspaper
author Merz, Leandra
Kshirsagar, Akhil R.
Rafaliarison, Radoniaina R.
Rajaonarivelo, Tsiky
Farris, Zach J.
Randriana, Zoavina
Valenta, Kim
spellingShingle Merz, Leandra
Kshirsagar, Akhil R.
Rafaliarison, Radoniaina R.
Rajaonarivelo, Tsiky
Farris, Zach J.
Randriana, Zoavina
Valenta, Kim
Wildlife predation by dogs in Madagascar
author_facet Merz, Leandra
Kshirsagar, Akhil R.
Rafaliarison, Radoniaina R.
Rajaonarivelo, Tsiky
Farris, Zach J.
Randriana, Zoavina
Valenta, Kim
author_sort Merz, Leandra
title Wildlife predation by dogs in Madagascar
title_short Wildlife predation by dogs in Madagascar
title_full Wildlife predation by dogs in Madagascar
title_fullStr Wildlife predation by dogs in Madagascar
title_full_unstemmed Wildlife predation by dogs in Madagascar
title_sort wildlife predation by dogs in madagascar
publisher Wiley
publishDate 2021
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/btp.13049
https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111/btp.13049
https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full-xml/10.1111/btp.13049
genre Canis lupus
genre_facet Canis lupus
op_source Biotropica
volume 54, issue 1, page 181-190
ISSN 0006-3606 1744-7429
op_rights http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/termsAndConditions#vor
op_doi https://doi.org/10.1111/btp.13049
container_title Biotropica
container_volume 54
container_issue 1
container_start_page 181
op_container_end_page 190
_version_ 1800749802759127040