Greater India's northern margin prior to its collision with Asia

Abstract Greater India's northern edge prior to collision with Asia is typically modelled as a rifted passive margin. We argue for a quite different geometry as a consequence of two tectonic episodes that happened sometime before the main impact. Whilst the western segment of India's north...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Published in:Basin Research
Main Authors: Ali, J. R., Aitchison, J. C.
Format: Article in Journal/Newspaper
Language:English
Published: Wiley 2014
Subjects:
Online Access:http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/bre.12040
https://api.wiley.com/onlinelibrary/tdm/v1/articles/10.1111%2Fbre.12040
https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111/bre.12040
id crwiley:10.1111/bre.12040
record_format openpolar
spelling crwiley:10.1111/bre.12040 2024-06-02T07:58:17+00:00 Greater India's northern margin prior to its collision with Asia Ali, J. R. Aitchison, J. C. 2014 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/bre.12040 https://api.wiley.com/onlinelibrary/tdm/v1/articles/10.1111%2Fbre.12040 https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111/bre.12040 en eng Wiley http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/termsAndConditions#vor Basin Research volume 26, issue 1, page 73-84 ISSN 0950-091X 1365-2117 journal-article 2014 crwiley https://doi.org/10.1111/bre.12040 2024-05-03T11:59:07Z Abstract Greater India's northern edge prior to collision with Asia is typically modelled as a rifted passive margin. We argue for a quite different geometry as a consequence of two tectonic episodes that happened sometime before the main impact. Whilst the western segment of India's northern boundary had formed in the Late Triassic as a rifted margin, the central and eastern portions developed between 132 and 110 Ma when the sub‐continent separated from Australia–Antarctica as the inner wall of a dextral ‘scything’ transform fault along the Wallaby–Zenith Fracture Zone off western Australia. Key features would have been (i) the very narrow (20–30 km wide) ocean–continent transition zone marking the sub‐continent's eastern northern boundary, and (ii) similar to the region offshore South Africa's Garden Route coast, Greater India's NE corner may have developed a series of ‘perched’ half grabens due to shearing related to its motion along the Wallaby–Zenith Fracture Zone, from initial break‐up until it passed the Zenith Plateau ( ca . 110 Ma). Differences in the development of NW Greater India may be reflected in restriction of ultra‐high pressure metamorphic rocks to the western Himalaya where late Paleocene subduction of the rifted passive margin occurred at sub‐equatorial latitudes beneath the intra‐Tethyan arc. Further east, where the margin developed along the scything transform, the continent–ocean boundary would have been more abrupt and probably less strongly welded. Ophiolite emplacement appears to have been penecontemporaneous along the margin. A subsequent slab break‐off episode then eliminated the original plate boundary. Thereafter, remaining oceanic lithosphere north of the arc sutured to the sub‐continent, albeit rather weakly, was consumed beneath Eurasia, culminating in India–Asia collision. Article in Journal/Newspaper Antarc* Antarctica Wiley Online Library Basin Research 26 1 73 84
institution Open Polar
collection Wiley Online Library
op_collection_id crwiley
language English
description Abstract Greater India's northern edge prior to collision with Asia is typically modelled as a rifted passive margin. We argue for a quite different geometry as a consequence of two tectonic episodes that happened sometime before the main impact. Whilst the western segment of India's northern boundary had formed in the Late Triassic as a rifted margin, the central and eastern portions developed between 132 and 110 Ma when the sub‐continent separated from Australia–Antarctica as the inner wall of a dextral ‘scything’ transform fault along the Wallaby–Zenith Fracture Zone off western Australia. Key features would have been (i) the very narrow (20–30 km wide) ocean–continent transition zone marking the sub‐continent's eastern northern boundary, and (ii) similar to the region offshore South Africa's Garden Route coast, Greater India's NE corner may have developed a series of ‘perched’ half grabens due to shearing related to its motion along the Wallaby–Zenith Fracture Zone, from initial break‐up until it passed the Zenith Plateau ( ca . 110 Ma). Differences in the development of NW Greater India may be reflected in restriction of ultra‐high pressure metamorphic rocks to the western Himalaya where late Paleocene subduction of the rifted passive margin occurred at sub‐equatorial latitudes beneath the intra‐Tethyan arc. Further east, where the margin developed along the scything transform, the continent–ocean boundary would have been more abrupt and probably less strongly welded. Ophiolite emplacement appears to have been penecontemporaneous along the margin. A subsequent slab break‐off episode then eliminated the original plate boundary. Thereafter, remaining oceanic lithosphere north of the arc sutured to the sub‐continent, albeit rather weakly, was consumed beneath Eurasia, culminating in India–Asia collision.
format Article in Journal/Newspaper
author Ali, J. R.
Aitchison, J. C.
spellingShingle Ali, J. R.
Aitchison, J. C.
Greater India's northern margin prior to its collision with Asia
author_facet Ali, J. R.
Aitchison, J. C.
author_sort Ali, J. R.
title Greater India's northern margin prior to its collision with Asia
title_short Greater India's northern margin prior to its collision with Asia
title_full Greater India's northern margin prior to its collision with Asia
title_fullStr Greater India's northern margin prior to its collision with Asia
title_full_unstemmed Greater India's northern margin prior to its collision with Asia
title_sort greater india's northern margin prior to its collision with asia
publisher Wiley
publishDate 2014
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/bre.12040
https://api.wiley.com/onlinelibrary/tdm/v1/articles/10.1111%2Fbre.12040
https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111/bre.12040
genre Antarc*
Antarctica
genre_facet Antarc*
Antarctica
op_source Basin Research
volume 26, issue 1, page 73-84
ISSN 0950-091X 1365-2117
op_rights http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/termsAndConditions#vor
op_doi https://doi.org/10.1111/bre.12040
container_title Basin Research
container_volume 26
container_issue 1
container_start_page 73
op_container_end_page 84
_version_ 1800741586143805440