The mouth apparatus of Lithodes maja ( Crustacea: Decapoda) – form, function and biological role

• Published in: Acta Zoologica
• Main Authors: Jaszkowiak, Katja, Keiler, Jonas, Wirkner, Christian S., Richter, Stefan
• Format: Article in Journal/Newspaper
• Language: English
• Published: Wiley 2015
• Subjects: Lithodes maja
• Online Access: http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/azo.12135; https://api.wiley.com/onlinelibrary/tdm/v1/articles/10.1111%2Fazo.12135; https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111/azo.12135

Abstract Being able to utilize many different food resources is probably an important aspect of the success of decapod crustaceans which fill a wide range of various ecological niches worldwide. The phenomenon is facilitated by the complex mouth apparatus found in this group, whose representatives possess six pairs of mouthparts– mandibles, maxillae 1, and maxillae 2 and three maxillipeds, the first three pairs of thoracic appendages which are also specialized to food manipulation. These six pairs are able to perform a number of movements for transporting, aligning, crushing and cutting. Studies into the functional morphology of mouthparts have already been carried out in some decapod species. This study focuses on L ithodes maja , a species of the hitherto understudied king crabs ( L ithodidae), chosen on the grounds of their remarkable evolutionary history as ‘derived hermit crabs’. Individuals were filmed while being presented with different kinds of food. To obtain structural information on the individual mouthpart elements as naturally arranged in relation to one another, the shape of the mouthparts was 3 D ‐reconstructed from micro‐ CT scans. These data were complemented by scanning electron microscopy, to analyse the surface structures in detail. There is evidence that the various elements of the mouthparts of L . maja can be sorted into six functional groups: (i) transporting mouthpart elements, (ii) aligning/sorting mouthpart elements, (iii) clutching/holding mouthpart elements, (iv) tearing/cutting/crushing mouthpart elements, (v) current‐generating mouthpart elements and (vi) grooming mouthpart elements. According to our 3D reconstruction, there only seem to be minor differences in morphology and relative position between the mouthparts of L . maja and those of the closely related species, P agurus bernhardus .