Evaluating refraction and visual acuity with the Nidek autorefractometer AR‐360A in a randomized population‐based screening study

Abstract Purpose The evaluation of visual acuity (VA) and refraction in the Northern Finland Birth Cohort Eye study was performed using the Nidek AR ‐360A autorefractometer. The accuracy of the method for this population‐based screening study was assessed. Methods Measurements of the refractive erro...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Published in:Acta Ophthalmologica
Main Authors: Stoor, Katri, Karvonen, Elina, Liinamaa, Johanna, Saarela, Ville
Other Authors: Suomen Lääketieteen Säätiö
Format: Article in Journal/Newspaper
Language:English
Published: Wiley 2017
Subjects:
Online Access:http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/aos.13636
https://api.wiley.com/onlinelibrary/tdm/v1/articles/10.1111%2Faos.13636
https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111/aos.13636
id crwiley:10.1111/aos.13636
record_format openpolar
spelling crwiley:10.1111/aos.13636 2024-06-02T08:12:02+00:00 Evaluating refraction and visual acuity with the Nidek autorefractometer AR‐360A in a randomized population‐based screening study Stoor, Katri Karvonen, Elina Liinamaa, Johanna Saarela, Ville Suomen Lääketieteen Säätiö 2017 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/aos.13636 https://api.wiley.com/onlinelibrary/tdm/v1/articles/10.1111%2Faos.13636 https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111/aos.13636 en eng Wiley http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/termsAndConditions#vor Acta Ophthalmologica volume 96, issue 4, page 384-389 ISSN 1755-375X 1755-3768 journal-article 2017 crwiley https://doi.org/10.1111/aos.13636 2024-05-03T10:48:43Z Abstract Purpose The evaluation of visual acuity (VA) and refraction in the Northern Finland Birth Cohort Eye study was performed using the Nidek AR ‐360A autorefractometer. The accuracy of the method for this population‐based screening study was assessed. Methods Measurements of the refractive error were obtained from the right eyes of 1238 subjects (mean age 47), first objectively with the AR ‐360A and then subjectively by an optometrist. Agreement with the subjective refraction was calculated for sphere, cylinder, mean spherical equivalent ( MSE ), cylindrical vectors J 45 and J 0 and presbyopic correction (add). Visual acuity (VA) was measured using an ETDRS chart and the autorefractometer. Results The refractive error measured with the AR ‐360A was higher than the subjective refraction performed by the optometrist for sphere (0.007 D ± 0.24 D p = 0.30) and also for cylinder (−0.16 D ± 0.20 D p < 0.0005). The bias between the measurements of MSE , J 45 and J 0 was low: −0.07 D ± 0.22 D (p = 0.002), 0.01 D ± 0.43 D (p = 0.25) and −0.01 D ± 0.42 D (p = 0.43), respectively. The amount of add measured by the autorefractometer was higher than the subjective 0.35 D ± 0.29 D (p < 0.0005). There was a statistically significant correlation between VA (p < 0.0005) and the difference between the subjective and objective refraction. In 99.2% of the measurements, visual values were within one decimal line of each other. Conclusion The Nidek AR ‐360A autorefractometer is an accurate tool for determining the refraction and VA in a clinical screening trial. Article in Journal/Newspaper Northern Finland Wiley Online Library Acta Ophthalmologica 96 4 384 389
institution Open Polar
collection Wiley Online Library
op_collection_id crwiley
language English
description Abstract Purpose The evaluation of visual acuity (VA) and refraction in the Northern Finland Birth Cohort Eye study was performed using the Nidek AR ‐360A autorefractometer. The accuracy of the method for this population‐based screening study was assessed. Methods Measurements of the refractive error were obtained from the right eyes of 1238 subjects (mean age 47), first objectively with the AR ‐360A and then subjectively by an optometrist. Agreement with the subjective refraction was calculated for sphere, cylinder, mean spherical equivalent ( MSE ), cylindrical vectors J 45 and J 0 and presbyopic correction (add). Visual acuity (VA) was measured using an ETDRS chart and the autorefractometer. Results The refractive error measured with the AR ‐360A was higher than the subjective refraction performed by the optometrist for sphere (0.007 D ± 0.24 D p = 0.30) and also for cylinder (−0.16 D ± 0.20 D p < 0.0005). The bias between the measurements of MSE , J 45 and J 0 was low: −0.07 D ± 0.22 D (p = 0.002), 0.01 D ± 0.43 D (p = 0.25) and −0.01 D ± 0.42 D (p = 0.43), respectively. The amount of add measured by the autorefractometer was higher than the subjective 0.35 D ± 0.29 D (p < 0.0005). There was a statistically significant correlation between VA (p < 0.0005) and the difference between the subjective and objective refraction. In 99.2% of the measurements, visual values were within one decimal line of each other. Conclusion The Nidek AR ‐360A autorefractometer is an accurate tool for determining the refraction and VA in a clinical screening trial.
author2 Suomen Lääketieteen Säätiö
format Article in Journal/Newspaper
author Stoor, Katri
Karvonen, Elina
Liinamaa, Johanna
Saarela, Ville
spellingShingle Stoor, Katri
Karvonen, Elina
Liinamaa, Johanna
Saarela, Ville
Evaluating refraction and visual acuity with the Nidek autorefractometer AR‐360A in a randomized population‐based screening study
author_facet Stoor, Katri
Karvonen, Elina
Liinamaa, Johanna
Saarela, Ville
author_sort Stoor, Katri
title Evaluating refraction and visual acuity with the Nidek autorefractometer AR‐360A in a randomized population‐based screening study
title_short Evaluating refraction and visual acuity with the Nidek autorefractometer AR‐360A in a randomized population‐based screening study
title_full Evaluating refraction and visual acuity with the Nidek autorefractometer AR‐360A in a randomized population‐based screening study
title_fullStr Evaluating refraction and visual acuity with the Nidek autorefractometer AR‐360A in a randomized population‐based screening study
title_full_unstemmed Evaluating refraction and visual acuity with the Nidek autorefractometer AR‐360A in a randomized population‐based screening study
title_sort evaluating refraction and visual acuity with the nidek autorefractometer ar‐360a in a randomized population‐based screening study
publisher Wiley
publishDate 2017
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/aos.13636
https://api.wiley.com/onlinelibrary/tdm/v1/articles/10.1111%2Faos.13636
https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111/aos.13636
genre Northern Finland
genre_facet Northern Finland
op_source Acta Ophthalmologica
volume 96, issue 4, page 384-389
ISSN 1755-375X 1755-3768
op_rights http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/termsAndConditions#vor
op_doi https://doi.org/10.1111/aos.13636
container_title Acta Ophthalmologica
container_volume 96
container_issue 4
container_start_page 384
op_container_end_page 389
_version_ 1800758363761410048