Counterfactual evaluation of two Austrian agri‐environmental schemes in 2014–2018

Abstract This article investigates the causal effect of farm participation in two Austrian agri‐environmental schemes (AES), Immergrün ( ground cover ) and Zwischenfrucht ( catch cropping ), on fertilizer and plant protection expenditures in the 2014 programming period. Combining European Farm Accou...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Published in:Agricultural Economics
Main Authors: Uehleke, Reinhard, Leonhardt, Heidi, Hüttel, Silke
Format: Article in Journal/Newspaper
Language:English
Published: Wiley 2023
Subjects:
DML
Online Access:http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/agec.12805
https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111/agec.12805
id crwiley:10.1111/agec.12805
record_format openpolar
spelling crwiley:10.1111/agec.12805 2024-06-02T08:05:48+00:00 Counterfactual evaluation of two Austrian agri‐environmental schemes in 2014–2018 Uehleke, Reinhard Leonhardt, Heidi Hüttel, Silke 2023 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/agec.12805 https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111/agec.12805 en eng Wiley http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ Agricultural Economics volume 55, issue 1, page 27-40 ISSN 0169-5150 1574-0862 journal-article 2023 crwiley https://doi.org/10.1111/agec.12805 2024-05-03T10:42:11Z Abstract This article investigates the causal effect of farm participation in two Austrian agri‐environmental schemes (AES), Immergrün ( ground cover ) and Zwischenfrucht ( catch cropping ), on fertilizer and plant protection expenditures in the 2014 programming period. Combining European Farm Accountancy Data Network data with information on scheme participation from administrative control data offers identifying farm participation in specific schemes targeted at reducing input intensity. Given the overall small sample, we maximized the utilizable sample size by combining difference‐in‐difference and kernel matching with automated bandwidth selection. To address the remaining post‐matching covariate imbalances, we used double machine learning (DML) techniques for a guided selection of potential confounding covariates. Our results suggest that, given the available sample, we cannot substantiate moderate effects of AES participation, and that guided covariate selection by DML offers no gain over non‐guided covariate selection for the small sample. Our results underline the need to increase the number of farms and the duration in available farm panels to substantiate future counterfactual‐based evaluations of policy. Article in Journal/Newspaper DML Wiley Online Library Agricultural Economics
institution Open Polar
collection Wiley Online Library
op_collection_id crwiley
language English
description Abstract This article investigates the causal effect of farm participation in two Austrian agri‐environmental schemes (AES), Immergrün ( ground cover ) and Zwischenfrucht ( catch cropping ), on fertilizer and plant protection expenditures in the 2014 programming period. Combining European Farm Accountancy Data Network data with information on scheme participation from administrative control data offers identifying farm participation in specific schemes targeted at reducing input intensity. Given the overall small sample, we maximized the utilizable sample size by combining difference‐in‐difference and kernel matching with automated bandwidth selection. To address the remaining post‐matching covariate imbalances, we used double machine learning (DML) techniques for a guided selection of potential confounding covariates. Our results suggest that, given the available sample, we cannot substantiate moderate effects of AES participation, and that guided covariate selection by DML offers no gain over non‐guided covariate selection for the small sample. Our results underline the need to increase the number of farms and the duration in available farm panels to substantiate future counterfactual‐based evaluations of policy.
format Article in Journal/Newspaper
author Uehleke, Reinhard
Leonhardt, Heidi
Hüttel, Silke
spellingShingle Uehleke, Reinhard
Leonhardt, Heidi
Hüttel, Silke
Counterfactual evaluation of two Austrian agri‐environmental schemes in 2014–2018
author_facet Uehleke, Reinhard
Leonhardt, Heidi
Hüttel, Silke
author_sort Uehleke, Reinhard
title Counterfactual evaluation of two Austrian agri‐environmental schemes in 2014–2018
title_short Counterfactual evaluation of two Austrian agri‐environmental schemes in 2014–2018
title_full Counterfactual evaluation of two Austrian agri‐environmental schemes in 2014–2018
title_fullStr Counterfactual evaluation of two Austrian agri‐environmental schemes in 2014–2018
title_full_unstemmed Counterfactual evaluation of two Austrian agri‐environmental schemes in 2014–2018
title_sort counterfactual evaluation of two austrian agri‐environmental schemes in 2014–2018
publisher Wiley
publishDate 2023
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/agec.12805
https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111/agec.12805
genre DML
genre_facet DML
op_source Agricultural Economics
volume 55, issue 1, page 27-40
ISSN 0169-5150 1574-0862
op_rights http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
op_doi https://doi.org/10.1111/agec.12805
container_title Agricultural Economics
_version_ 1800750679622418432