Good from far, but far from good: The impact of a reference genome on evolutionary inference

• Published in: Molecular Ecology Resources
• Main Authors: Bentley, Blair P., Armstrong, Ellie E.
• Format: Article in Journal/Newspaper
• Language: English
• Published: Wiley 2021
• Subjects: Beluga; Beluga whale; Beluga*
• Online Access: http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/1755-0998.13531; https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111/1755-0998.13531; https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full-xml/10.1111/1755-0998.13531

Genomic diversity and past population histories are key considerations in the fields of conservation and evolutionary biology. In this issue of Molecular Ecology Resources , Prasad et al. ( Mol. Ecol. Resour ., 2021) examine how the quality and phylogenetic divergence of reference genomes influences the outcomes of downstream analyses such as diversity and demographic history inference. Using the beluga whale and rowi kiwi as examples (Figure 1), they systematically estimate heterozygosity, runs of homozygosity (ROH), and demographic history (PSMC) using reference genomes of varying quality and phylogenetic divergence from the target species. They show that demographic history analyses are impacted by phylogenetic distance, although this is not pronounced until divergence exceeds 3% from the target species. Similarly, their results imply that heterozygosity estimates are dependent on phylogenetic distance and the method used to perform the estimates, and ROHs are potentially undetectable when a nonconspecific reference is used. This investigation into the role of divergence and quality of reference genomes highlights the impact and potential biases generated by genome selection on downstream analyses, and provides a possible alternative in cross‐species scaffolding in instances where a conspecific reference genome is not available.