A comparison of cell‐based and cell‐cultured as appropriate common or usual names to label products made from the cells of fish

Abstract Using an online experiment with a nationally representative sample of 1200 adult American consumers, two “common or usual names,” “Cell‐Based Seafood” and “Cell‐Cultured Seafood,” were assessed using five criteria. Displayed on packages of frozen Atlantic Salmon, both “Cell‐Based” (60.1%) a...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Published in:Journal of Food Science
Main Author: Hallman, William K.
Format: Article in Journal/Newspaper
Language:English
Published: Wiley 2021
Subjects:
Online Access:http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/1750-3841.15860
https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111/1750-3841.15860
https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full-xml/10.1111/1750-3841.15860
id crwiley:10.1111/1750-3841.15860
record_format openpolar
spelling crwiley:10.1111/1750-3841.15860 2024-09-15T17:56:34+00:00 A comparison of cell‐based and cell‐cultured as appropriate common or usual names to label products made from the cells of fish Hallman, William K. Hallman, William K. 2021 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/1750-3841.15860 https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111/1750-3841.15860 https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full-xml/10.1111/1750-3841.15860 en eng Wiley http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ Journal of Food Science volume 86, issue 9, page 3798-3809 ISSN 0022-1147 1750-3841 journal-article 2021 crwiley https://doi.org/10.1111/1750-3841.15860 2024-08-09T04:32:02Z Abstract Using an online experiment with a nationally representative sample of 1200 adult American consumers, two “common or usual names,” “Cell‐Based Seafood” and “Cell‐Cultured Seafood,” were assessed using five criteria. Displayed on packages of frozen Atlantic Salmon, both “Cell‐Based” (60.1%) and “Cell‐Cultured” (58.9%) enabled participants to differentiate the novel products from “Farm‐Raised” and “Wild‐Caught” fish and 74% also recognized that those allergic to fish should not consume the product. Thus, both names met key regulatory criteria. Both names were seen as appropriate terms for describing the process for creating the product, meeting the criteria for transparency. There were no significant differences in the perceived safety, naturalness, taste, or nutritiousness of the products bearing the two names. However, participants’ overall impressions associated with “Cell‐Based” were rated as more positive than those associated with “Cell‐Cultured” ( P < 0.001, η 2 = 0.010), as were their initial thoughts, images, and feelings ( P < 0.001, η 2 = 0.008). The participants were also slightly more interested in tasting ( P < 0.05, η 2 = 0.004) and in purchasing ( P < 0.01, η 2 = 0.006) “Cell‐Based” than “Cell‐Cultured” seafood. After learning the meaning of the terms, participants’ overall impressions of “Cell‐Based” remained higher than “Cell‐Cultured” ( P < 0.05, η 2 = 0.003) and they remained slightly more interested in tasting ( P < 0.05, η 2 = 0.004) and in purchasing ( P < 0.05, η 2 = 0.005) “Cell‐Based” than “Cell‐Cultured” seafood. Therefore, “Cell‐Based Seafood” should be adopted as the best common or usual name for seafood made from the cells of fish. Practical Application Widespread adoption and consistent use of a single “common or usual name” for “Cell‐Based” seafood, meat, poultry, and other products by the food industry, regulators, journalists, marketers, environmental, consumer, and animal rights advocates, and other key stakeholders would help shape public perceptions ... Article in Journal/Newspaper Atlantic salmon Wiley Online Library Journal of Food Science 86 9 3798 3809
institution Open Polar
collection Wiley Online Library
op_collection_id crwiley
language English
description Abstract Using an online experiment with a nationally representative sample of 1200 adult American consumers, two “common or usual names,” “Cell‐Based Seafood” and “Cell‐Cultured Seafood,” were assessed using five criteria. Displayed on packages of frozen Atlantic Salmon, both “Cell‐Based” (60.1%) and “Cell‐Cultured” (58.9%) enabled participants to differentiate the novel products from “Farm‐Raised” and “Wild‐Caught” fish and 74% also recognized that those allergic to fish should not consume the product. Thus, both names met key regulatory criteria. Both names were seen as appropriate terms for describing the process for creating the product, meeting the criteria for transparency. There were no significant differences in the perceived safety, naturalness, taste, or nutritiousness of the products bearing the two names. However, participants’ overall impressions associated with “Cell‐Based” were rated as more positive than those associated with “Cell‐Cultured” ( P < 0.001, η 2 = 0.010), as were their initial thoughts, images, and feelings ( P < 0.001, η 2 = 0.008). The participants were also slightly more interested in tasting ( P < 0.05, η 2 = 0.004) and in purchasing ( P < 0.01, η 2 = 0.006) “Cell‐Based” than “Cell‐Cultured” seafood. After learning the meaning of the terms, participants’ overall impressions of “Cell‐Based” remained higher than “Cell‐Cultured” ( P < 0.05, η 2 = 0.003) and they remained slightly more interested in tasting ( P < 0.05, η 2 = 0.004) and in purchasing ( P < 0.05, η 2 = 0.005) “Cell‐Based” than “Cell‐Cultured” seafood. Therefore, “Cell‐Based Seafood” should be adopted as the best common or usual name for seafood made from the cells of fish. Practical Application Widespread adoption and consistent use of a single “common or usual name” for “Cell‐Based” seafood, meat, poultry, and other products by the food industry, regulators, journalists, marketers, environmental, consumer, and animal rights advocates, and other key stakeholders would help shape public perceptions ...
format Article in Journal/Newspaper
author Hallman, William K.
Hallman, William K.
spellingShingle Hallman, William K.
Hallman, William K.
A comparison of cell‐based and cell‐cultured as appropriate common or usual names to label products made from the cells of fish
author_facet Hallman, William K.
Hallman, William K.
author_sort Hallman, William K.
title A comparison of cell‐based and cell‐cultured as appropriate common or usual names to label products made from the cells of fish
title_short A comparison of cell‐based and cell‐cultured as appropriate common or usual names to label products made from the cells of fish
title_full A comparison of cell‐based and cell‐cultured as appropriate common or usual names to label products made from the cells of fish
title_fullStr A comparison of cell‐based and cell‐cultured as appropriate common or usual names to label products made from the cells of fish
title_full_unstemmed A comparison of cell‐based and cell‐cultured as appropriate common or usual names to label products made from the cells of fish
title_sort comparison of cell‐based and cell‐cultured as appropriate common or usual names to label products made from the cells of fish
publisher Wiley
publishDate 2021
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/1750-3841.15860
https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111/1750-3841.15860
https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full-xml/10.1111/1750-3841.15860
genre Atlantic salmon
genre_facet Atlantic salmon
op_source Journal of Food Science
volume 86, issue 9, page 3798-3809
ISSN 0022-1147 1750-3841
op_rights http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
op_doi https://doi.org/10.1111/1750-3841.15860
container_title Journal of Food Science
container_volume 86
container_issue 9
container_start_page 3798
op_container_end_page 3809
_version_ 1810432760648564736