Like or dislike: Response of rodents to the odor of plant secondary metabolites

Abstract Rodents, including common voles ( Microtus arvalis ) and house mice ( Mus musculus ) cause immense pre‐harvest and post‐harvest losses. Therefore, developing methods that mitigate these losses while maintaining their role in ecosystems is a priority. Several plant secondary metabolites (PSM...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Published in:Integrative Zoology
Main Authors: HANSEN, Sabine C., STOLTER, Caroline, IMHOLT, Christian, JACOB, Jens
Format: Article in Journal/Newspaper
Language:English
Published: Wiley 2017
Subjects:
Online Access:http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/1749-4877.12245
https://api.wiley.com/onlinelibrary/tdm/v1/articles/10.1111%2F1749-4877.12245
https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111/1749-4877.12245
id crwiley:10.1111/1749-4877.12245
record_format openpolar
spelling crwiley:10.1111/1749-4877.12245 2024-09-15T18:18:47+00:00 Like or dislike: Response of rodents to the odor of plant secondary metabolites HANSEN, Sabine C. STOLTER, Caroline IMHOLT, Christian JACOB, Jens 2017 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/1749-4877.12245 https://api.wiley.com/onlinelibrary/tdm/v1/articles/10.1111%2F1749-4877.12245 https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111/1749-4877.12245 en eng Wiley http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/termsAndConditions#vor Integrative Zoology volume 12, issue 5, page 428-436 ISSN 1749-4877 1749-4877 journal-article 2017 crwiley https://doi.org/10.1111/1749-4877.12245 2024-08-01T04:20:06Z Abstract Rodents, including common voles ( Microtus arvalis ) and house mice ( Mus musculus ) cause immense pre‐harvest and post‐harvest losses. Therefore, developing methods that mitigate these losses while maintaining their role in ecosystems is a priority. Several plant secondary metabolites (PSM) which significantly reduce food intake of both species under laboratory conditions have been identified. However, before these can be used in rodent pest management, they must be tested under more natural conditions where other food sources are available. In this study, the odors of 4 PSMs were evaluated for their repellent effects in experiments conducted in semi‐natural enclosures. Soil treated with PSMs or untreated soil (experimental control) was placed in an underground box containing food (rolled oats). We quantified the number of visits to each box and could demonstrate that all 4 PSMs reduced the number of visits to treatment boxes in both rodent species. For common voles the combination of methyl nonyl ketone + black pepper oil was the most repellent PSM. House mice made fewer visits to all PSM boxes; boxes with the anthraquinone were visited least. Furthermore, house mice consumed less food from boxes containing soil treated with all 4 PSMs. Our results suggest that PSMs are repellent in murid and microtine rodents under semi‐field conditions. In addition, the future use of PSM odors for repelling both pest species, especially house mice, seems promising. Further investigations with other PSMs, different concentrations as well as alternative application methods are needed to repel common voles from attractive crops. Article in Journal/Newspaper Microtus arvalis Wiley Online Library Integrative Zoology 12 5 428 436
institution Open Polar
collection Wiley Online Library
op_collection_id crwiley
language English
description Abstract Rodents, including common voles ( Microtus arvalis ) and house mice ( Mus musculus ) cause immense pre‐harvest and post‐harvest losses. Therefore, developing methods that mitigate these losses while maintaining their role in ecosystems is a priority. Several plant secondary metabolites (PSM) which significantly reduce food intake of both species under laboratory conditions have been identified. However, before these can be used in rodent pest management, they must be tested under more natural conditions where other food sources are available. In this study, the odors of 4 PSMs were evaluated for their repellent effects in experiments conducted in semi‐natural enclosures. Soil treated with PSMs or untreated soil (experimental control) was placed in an underground box containing food (rolled oats). We quantified the number of visits to each box and could demonstrate that all 4 PSMs reduced the number of visits to treatment boxes in both rodent species. For common voles the combination of methyl nonyl ketone + black pepper oil was the most repellent PSM. House mice made fewer visits to all PSM boxes; boxes with the anthraquinone were visited least. Furthermore, house mice consumed less food from boxes containing soil treated with all 4 PSMs. Our results suggest that PSMs are repellent in murid and microtine rodents under semi‐field conditions. In addition, the future use of PSM odors for repelling both pest species, especially house mice, seems promising. Further investigations with other PSMs, different concentrations as well as alternative application methods are needed to repel common voles from attractive crops.
format Article in Journal/Newspaper
author HANSEN, Sabine C.
STOLTER, Caroline
IMHOLT, Christian
JACOB, Jens
spellingShingle HANSEN, Sabine C.
STOLTER, Caroline
IMHOLT, Christian
JACOB, Jens
Like or dislike: Response of rodents to the odor of plant secondary metabolites
author_facet HANSEN, Sabine C.
STOLTER, Caroline
IMHOLT, Christian
JACOB, Jens
author_sort HANSEN, Sabine C.
title Like or dislike: Response of rodents to the odor of plant secondary metabolites
title_short Like or dislike: Response of rodents to the odor of plant secondary metabolites
title_full Like or dislike: Response of rodents to the odor of plant secondary metabolites
title_fullStr Like or dislike: Response of rodents to the odor of plant secondary metabolites
title_full_unstemmed Like or dislike: Response of rodents to the odor of plant secondary metabolites
title_sort like or dislike: response of rodents to the odor of plant secondary metabolites
publisher Wiley
publishDate 2017
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/1749-4877.12245
https://api.wiley.com/onlinelibrary/tdm/v1/articles/10.1111%2F1749-4877.12245
https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111/1749-4877.12245
genre Microtus arvalis
genre_facet Microtus arvalis
op_source Integrative Zoology
volume 12, issue 5, page 428-436
ISSN 1749-4877 1749-4877
op_rights http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/termsAndConditions#vor
op_doi https://doi.org/10.1111/1749-4877.12245
container_title Integrative Zoology
container_volume 12
container_issue 5
container_start_page 428
op_container_end_page 436
_version_ 1810456855552458752