Competition‐induced tree mortality across Europe is driven by shade tolerance, proportion of conspecifics and drought

Abstract Forest stand densities are increasing in the boreal and temperate biomes, suggesting that tree‐tree competition is intensifying. Anticipating the consequences of this intensified competition is difficult because competition‐induced mortality may depend not only on the occurrence of extreme...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Published in:Journal of Ecology
Main Authors: Kulha, Niko, Honkaniemi, Juha, Barrere, Julien, Brandl, Susanne, Cordonnier, Thomas, Korhonen, Kari T., Kunstler, Georges, Paul, Carola, Reineking, Björn, Peltoniemi, Mikko
Other Authors: Academy of Finland, Agence Nationale de la Recherche, Bundesministerium für Bildung und Forschung
Format: Article in Journal/Newspaper
Language:English
Published: Wiley 2023
Subjects:
Online Access:http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/1365-2745.14184
https://besjournals.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111/1365-2745.14184
id crwiley:10.1111/1365-2745.14184
record_format openpolar
spelling crwiley:10.1111/1365-2745.14184 2024-09-09T19:28:02+00:00 Competition‐induced tree mortality across Europe is driven by shade tolerance, proportion of conspecifics and drought Kulha, Niko Honkaniemi, Juha Barrere, Julien Brandl, Susanne Cordonnier, Thomas Korhonen, Kari T. Kunstler, Georges Paul, Carola Reineking, Björn Peltoniemi, Mikko Academy of Finland Agence Nationale de la Recherche Bundesministerium für Bildung und Forschung 2023 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/1365-2745.14184 https://besjournals.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111/1365-2745.14184 en eng Wiley http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ Journal of Ecology volume 111, issue 10, page 2310-2323 ISSN 0022-0477 1365-2745 journal-article 2023 crwiley https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2745.14184 2024-08-27T04:32:36Z Abstract Forest stand densities are increasing in the boreal and temperate biomes, suggesting that tree‐tree competition is intensifying. Anticipating the consequences of this intensified competition is difficult because competition‐induced mortality may depend not only on the occurrence of extreme climatic events such as drought, but also on stand composition, since tree species differ in their ability to compete and tolerate competition. A better understanding of the effects of stand composition and drought on competition‐induced mortality would help to anticipate future changes in forest ecosystems. We studied the tree‐level probability of competition‐induced mortality using National Forest Inventory data from three European countries (Finland, France and Germany), covering a latitudinal gradient from the Mediterranean to the Arctic. We investigated how (i) the proportion of conspecifics, (ii) the shade tolerance (ST) of the focal tree and its competitors and (iii) drought events modify the effect of competition on tree mortality. We used a generalized linear mixed model on a dataset of 461,109 trees representing 39 species on 48,088 individual plots. Competition, measured as the basal area of larger trees, was a stronger driver of background mortality (BM) than tree size and climate. A higher proportion of conspecifics increased the competition effect on mortality, showing that conspecific individuals had a higher competitive effect compared to heterospecific individuals. The competition effect on mortality also increased as a function of the ST of neighbouring trees, suggesting an increased shading effect. A higher ST of a focal tree decreased the competition effect on mortality. Drought anomalies increased the competition effect, resulting in a higher mortality probability for the most suppressed trees. Synthesis . Competition was the main driver of background mortality. Increasing stand density increased competition‐induced tree mortality in both monospecific and mixed stands, but to different extents ... Article in Journal/Newspaper Arctic Wiley Online Library Arctic Journal of Ecology 111 10 2310 2323
institution Open Polar
collection Wiley Online Library
op_collection_id crwiley
language English
description Abstract Forest stand densities are increasing in the boreal and temperate biomes, suggesting that tree‐tree competition is intensifying. Anticipating the consequences of this intensified competition is difficult because competition‐induced mortality may depend not only on the occurrence of extreme climatic events such as drought, but also on stand composition, since tree species differ in their ability to compete and tolerate competition. A better understanding of the effects of stand composition and drought on competition‐induced mortality would help to anticipate future changes in forest ecosystems. We studied the tree‐level probability of competition‐induced mortality using National Forest Inventory data from three European countries (Finland, France and Germany), covering a latitudinal gradient from the Mediterranean to the Arctic. We investigated how (i) the proportion of conspecifics, (ii) the shade tolerance (ST) of the focal tree and its competitors and (iii) drought events modify the effect of competition on tree mortality. We used a generalized linear mixed model on a dataset of 461,109 trees representing 39 species on 48,088 individual plots. Competition, measured as the basal area of larger trees, was a stronger driver of background mortality (BM) than tree size and climate. A higher proportion of conspecifics increased the competition effect on mortality, showing that conspecific individuals had a higher competitive effect compared to heterospecific individuals. The competition effect on mortality also increased as a function of the ST of neighbouring trees, suggesting an increased shading effect. A higher ST of a focal tree decreased the competition effect on mortality. Drought anomalies increased the competition effect, resulting in a higher mortality probability for the most suppressed trees. Synthesis . Competition was the main driver of background mortality. Increasing stand density increased competition‐induced tree mortality in both monospecific and mixed stands, but to different extents ...
author2 Academy of Finland
Agence Nationale de la Recherche
Bundesministerium für Bildung und Forschung
format Article in Journal/Newspaper
author Kulha, Niko
Honkaniemi, Juha
Barrere, Julien
Brandl, Susanne
Cordonnier, Thomas
Korhonen, Kari T.
Kunstler, Georges
Paul, Carola
Reineking, Björn
Peltoniemi, Mikko
spellingShingle Kulha, Niko
Honkaniemi, Juha
Barrere, Julien
Brandl, Susanne
Cordonnier, Thomas
Korhonen, Kari T.
Kunstler, Georges
Paul, Carola
Reineking, Björn
Peltoniemi, Mikko
Competition‐induced tree mortality across Europe is driven by shade tolerance, proportion of conspecifics and drought
author_facet Kulha, Niko
Honkaniemi, Juha
Barrere, Julien
Brandl, Susanne
Cordonnier, Thomas
Korhonen, Kari T.
Kunstler, Georges
Paul, Carola
Reineking, Björn
Peltoniemi, Mikko
author_sort Kulha, Niko
title Competition‐induced tree mortality across Europe is driven by shade tolerance, proportion of conspecifics and drought
title_short Competition‐induced tree mortality across Europe is driven by shade tolerance, proportion of conspecifics and drought
title_full Competition‐induced tree mortality across Europe is driven by shade tolerance, proportion of conspecifics and drought
title_fullStr Competition‐induced tree mortality across Europe is driven by shade tolerance, proportion of conspecifics and drought
title_full_unstemmed Competition‐induced tree mortality across Europe is driven by shade tolerance, proportion of conspecifics and drought
title_sort competition‐induced tree mortality across europe is driven by shade tolerance, proportion of conspecifics and drought
publisher Wiley
publishDate 2023
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/1365-2745.14184
https://besjournals.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111/1365-2745.14184
geographic Arctic
geographic_facet Arctic
genre Arctic
genre_facet Arctic
op_source Journal of Ecology
volume 111, issue 10, page 2310-2323
ISSN 0022-0477 1365-2745
op_rights http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
op_doi https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2745.14184
container_title Journal of Ecology
container_volume 111
container_issue 10
container_start_page 2310
op_container_end_page 2323
_version_ 1809897332531003392