Cause for caution: Response to Forum Contribution by van der Meer and Folmer

Abstract Triggered by the disappearance of the bivalve‐eating red knots Calidris canutus from feeding areas in the western Dutch Wadden Sea after these intertidal flats were exposed to the harvesting of edible cockles Cerastoderma edule by shallow‐draft suction dredging vessels, the admission of suc...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Published in:Journal of Applied Ecology
Main Authors: Piersma, Theunis, Koolhaas, Anita, van Gils, Jan A., Dekinga, Anne
Format: Article in Journal/Newspaper
Language:English
Published: Wiley 2023
Subjects:
Online Access:http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.14500
https://besjournals.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111/1365-2664.14500
id crwiley:10.1111/1365-2664.14500
record_format openpolar
spelling crwiley:10.1111/1365-2664.14500 2024-06-02T08:04:48+00:00 Cause for caution: Response to Forum Contribution by van der Meer and Folmer Piersma, Theunis Koolhaas, Anita van Gils, Jan A. Dekinga, Anne 2023 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.14500 https://besjournals.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111/1365-2664.14500 en eng Wiley http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/termsAndConditions#vor Journal of Applied Ecology volume 60, issue 11, page 2494-2496 ISSN 0021-8901 1365-2664 journal-article 2023 crwiley https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.14500 2024-05-03T11:29:24Z Abstract Triggered by the disappearance of the bivalve‐eating red knots Calidris canutus from feeding areas in the western Dutch Wadden Sea after these intertidal flats were exposed to the harvesting of edible cockles Cerastoderma edule by shallow‐draft suction dredging vessels, the admission of such dredging practices in this state nature monument, RAMSAR‐site and area designated protection under the EC Habitat and Bird Directives became an issue of politicized and heated societal debate in the 1990s and early 2000s. In the absence of focussed scientific research yielding peer‐reviewed papers, the few published studies on the issue were ‘side‐products’ of a long‐term study on foraging ecology and population dynamics of red knots. In their contribution, van der Meer and Folmer criticized some of the statistical analyses in, what they consider, key papers leading to the closure of these forms of shellfish‐harvesting in the Dutch Wadden Sea. The material provided by van der Meer and Folmer represents useful hindsight, further analytical sophistication and a (in our view biased) literature review, and thus raises new issues of concern, while leaving intact the arguments for concern about harmful ecological effects of large‐scale suction‐dredging in protected intertidal areas. Policy implications . We conclude that, even in the light of the statistical concerns expressed by van der Meer and Folmer, there is still reasonable doubt on an absence of harmful ecological effects of suction‐dredging. This means that the eventual precautionary ruling on suction‐dredging for cockles in the protected Dutch Wadden Sea would remain perfectly valid. Article in Journal/Newspaper Calidris canutus Wiley Online Library Folmer ENVELOPE(12.601,12.601,64.648,64.648) Journal of Applied Ecology 60 11 2494 2496
institution Open Polar
collection Wiley Online Library
op_collection_id crwiley
language English
description Abstract Triggered by the disappearance of the bivalve‐eating red knots Calidris canutus from feeding areas in the western Dutch Wadden Sea after these intertidal flats were exposed to the harvesting of edible cockles Cerastoderma edule by shallow‐draft suction dredging vessels, the admission of such dredging practices in this state nature monument, RAMSAR‐site and area designated protection under the EC Habitat and Bird Directives became an issue of politicized and heated societal debate in the 1990s and early 2000s. In the absence of focussed scientific research yielding peer‐reviewed papers, the few published studies on the issue were ‘side‐products’ of a long‐term study on foraging ecology and population dynamics of red knots. In their contribution, van der Meer and Folmer criticized some of the statistical analyses in, what they consider, key papers leading to the closure of these forms of shellfish‐harvesting in the Dutch Wadden Sea. The material provided by van der Meer and Folmer represents useful hindsight, further analytical sophistication and a (in our view biased) literature review, and thus raises new issues of concern, while leaving intact the arguments for concern about harmful ecological effects of large‐scale suction‐dredging in protected intertidal areas. Policy implications . We conclude that, even in the light of the statistical concerns expressed by van der Meer and Folmer, there is still reasonable doubt on an absence of harmful ecological effects of suction‐dredging. This means that the eventual precautionary ruling on suction‐dredging for cockles in the protected Dutch Wadden Sea would remain perfectly valid.
format Article in Journal/Newspaper
author Piersma, Theunis
Koolhaas, Anita
van Gils, Jan A.
Dekinga, Anne
spellingShingle Piersma, Theunis
Koolhaas, Anita
van Gils, Jan A.
Dekinga, Anne
Cause for caution: Response to Forum Contribution by van der Meer and Folmer
author_facet Piersma, Theunis
Koolhaas, Anita
van Gils, Jan A.
Dekinga, Anne
author_sort Piersma, Theunis
title Cause for caution: Response to Forum Contribution by van der Meer and Folmer
title_short Cause for caution: Response to Forum Contribution by van der Meer and Folmer
title_full Cause for caution: Response to Forum Contribution by van der Meer and Folmer
title_fullStr Cause for caution: Response to Forum Contribution by van der Meer and Folmer
title_full_unstemmed Cause for caution: Response to Forum Contribution by van der Meer and Folmer
title_sort cause for caution: response to forum contribution by van der meer and folmer
publisher Wiley
publishDate 2023
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.14500
https://besjournals.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111/1365-2664.14500
long_lat ENVELOPE(12.601,12.601,64.648,64.648)
geographic Folmer
geographic_facet Folmer
genre Calidris canutus
genre_facet Calidris canutus
op_source Journal of Applied Ecology
volume 60, issue 11, page 2494-2496
ISSN 0021-8901 1365-2664
op_rights http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/termsAndConditions#vor
op_doi https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.14500
container_title Journal of Applied Ecology
container_volume 60
container_issue 11
container_start_page 2494
op_container_end_page 2496
_version_ 1800749462245605376