South for the winter? Within‐dive foraging effort reveals the trade‐offs between divergent foraging strategies in a free‐ranging predator

Summary Central to an animal's fitness is its foraging strategy and understanding the choices made by foraging animals is a fundamental aim in animal ecology. For diving animals, quantifying foraging effort within dives provides a measure of foraging that can be integrated with location informa...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Published in:Functional Ecology
Main Authors: Arthur, Benjamin, Hindell, Mark, Bester, Marthan N., Oosthuizen, W. Chris, Wege, Mia, Lea, Mary‐Anne
Other Authors: Costa, Daniel, Sea World Research and Rescue Foundation, Holsworth Wildlife Research Endowment
Format: Article in Journal/Newspaper
Language:English
Published: Wiley 2016
Subjects:
Online Access:http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/1365-2435.12636
https://api.wiley.com/onlinelibrary/tdm/v1/articles/10.1111%2F1365-2435.12636
https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111/1365-2435.12636
https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full-xml/10.1111/1365-2435.12636
https://besjournals.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111/1365-2435.12636
id crwiley:10.1111/1365-2435.12636
record_format openpolar
spelling crwiley:10.1111/1365-2435.12636 2024-06-02T07:58:02+00:00 South for the winter? Within‐dive foraging effort reveals the trade‐offs between divergent foraging strategies in a free‐ranging predator Arthur, Benjamin Hindell, Mark Bester, Marthan N. Oosthuizen, W. Chris Wege, Mia Lea, Mary‐Anne Costa, Daniel Sea World Research and Rescue Foundation Holsworth Wildlife Research Endowment 2016 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/1365-2435.12636 https://api.wiley.com/onlinelibrary/tdm/v1/articles/10.1111%2F1365-2435.12636 https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111/1365-2435.12636 https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full-xml/10.1111/1365-2435.12636 https://besjournals.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111/1365-2435.12636 en eng Wiley http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/termsAndConditions#vor Functional Ecology volume 30, issue 10, page 1623-1637 ISSN 0269-8463 1365-2435 journal-article 2016 crwiley https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2435.12636 2024-05-03T10:44:24Z Summary Central to an animal's fitness is its foraging strategy and understanding the choices made by foraging animals is a fundamental aim in animal ecology. For diving animals, quantifying foraging effort within dives provides a measure of foraging that can be integrated with location information to reveal how animals use their environment as well as the trade‐offs associated with contrasting foraging strategies. We investigated the diving behaviour of 12 free‐ranging Antarctic fur seals ( Arctocephalus gazella ) during their post‐breeding winter migrations, quantifying within‐dive foraging effort using a novel approach to identify divergent foraging strategies and determine the costs and benefits associated with foraging decisions. Significant differences identified in both diving behaviour and foraging effort of female Antarctic fur seals could be attributed to two main, contrasting foraging strategies. Habitat was a major determinant of diving and foraging behaviour, with clear differences occurring either side of the Polar Front, a prominent oceanographic feature in the Southern Ocean. Longer night duration and improved access to vertically migrating prey lead to increased foraging opportunities and a reduced foraging effort south of the Polar Front. Dives in this region were short and shallow. Conversely, seals remaining closer to the breeding colony north of the Polar Front had deep, long dives and an elevated foraging effort. The distinct foraging strategies of fur seals have associated trade‐offs related to habitat availability, travel costs, prey accessibility and prey quality, which are likely driving their foraging decisions. This study highlights the trade‐offs between contrasting foraging strategies that currently coexist within a population of a wide‐ranging predator and raises questions about the viability of strategies with future change to population size or environmental conditions. Finally, understanding the trade‐offs associated with foraging strategies is important for assessing the ... Article in Journal/Newspaper Antarc* Antarctic Antarctic Fur Seals Arctocephalus gazella Southern Ocean Wiley Online Library Antarctic Southern Ocean Functional Ecology 30 10 1623 1637
institution Open Polar
collection Wiley Online Library
op_collection_id crwiley
language English
description Summary Central to an animal's fitness is its foraging strategy and understanding the choices made by foraging animals is a fundamental aim in animal ecology. For diving animals, quantifying foraging effort within dives provides a measure of foraging that can be integrated with location information to reveal how animals use their environment as well as the trade‐offs associated with contrasting foraging strategies. We investigated the diving behaviour of 12 free‐ranging Antarctic fur seals ( Arctocephalus gazella ) during their post‐breeding winter migrations, quantifying within‐dive foraging effort using a novel approach to identify divergent foraging strategies and determine the costs and benefits associated with foraging decisions. Significant differences identified in both diving behaviour and foraging effort of female Antarctic fur seals could be attributed to two main, contrasting foraging strategies. Habitat was a major determinant of diving and foraging behaviour, with clear differences occurring either side of the Polar Front, a prominent oceanographic feature in the Southern Ocean. Longer night duration and improved access to vertically migrating prey lead to increased foraging opportunities and a reduced foraging effort south of the Polar Front. Dives in this region were short and shallow. Conversely, seals remaining closer to the breeding colony north of the Polar Front had deep, long dives and an elevated foraging effort. The distinct foraging strategies of fur seals have associated trade‐offs related to habitat availability, travel costs, prey accessibility and prey quality, which are likely driving their foraging decisions. This study highlights the trade‐offs between contrasting foraging strategies that currently coexist within a population of a wide‐ranging predator and raises questions about the viability of strategies with future change to population size or environmental conditions. Finally, understanding the trade‐offs associated with foraging strategies is important for assessing the ...
author2 Costa, Daniel
Sea World Research and Rescue Foundation
Holsworth Wildlife Research Endowment
format Article in Journal/Newspaper
author Arthur, Benjamin
Hindell, Mark
Bester, Marthan N.
Oosthuizen, W. Chris
Wege, Mia
Lea, Mary‐Anne
spellingShingle Arthur, Benjamin
Hindell, Mark
Bester, Marthan N.
Oosthuizen, W. Chris
Wege, Mia
Lea, Mary‐Anne
South for the winter? Within‐dive foraging effort reveals the trade‐offs between divergent foraging strategies in a free‐ranging predator
author_facet Arthur, Benjamin
Hindell, Mark
Bester, Marthan N.
Oosthuizen, W. Chris
Wege, Mia
Lea, Mary‐Anne
author_sort Arthur, Benjamin
title South for the winter? Within‐dive foraging effort reveals the trade‐offs between divergent foraging strategies in a free‐ranging predator
title_short South for the winter? Within‐dive foraging effort reveals the trade‐offs between divergent foraging strategies in a free‐ranging predator
title_full South for the winter? Within‐dive foraging effort reveals the trade‐offs between divergent foraging strategies in a free‐ranging predator
title_fullStr South for the winter? Within‐dive foraging effort reveals the trade‐offs between divergent foraging strategies in a free‐ranging predator
title_full_unstemmed South for the winter? Within‐dive foraging effort reveals the trade‐offs between divergent foraging strategies in a free‐ranging predator
title_sort south for the winter? within‐dive foraging effort reveals the trade‐offs between divergent foraging strategies in a free‐ranging predator
publisher Wiley
publishDate 2016
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/1365-2435.12636
https://api.wiley.com/onlinelibrary/tdm/v1/articles/10.1111%2F1365-2435.12636
https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111/1365-2435.12636
https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full-xml/10.1111/1365-2435.12636
https://besjournals.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111/1365-2435.12636
geographic Antarctic
Southern Ocean
geographic_facet Antarctic
Southern Ocean
genre Antarc*
Antarctic
Antarctic Fur Seals
Arctocephalus gazella
Southern Ocean
genre_facet Antarc*
Antarctic
Antarctic Fur Seals
Arctocephalus gazella
Southern Ocean
op_source Functional Ecology
volume 30, issue 10, page 1623-1637
ISSN 0269-8463 1365-2435
op_rights http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/termsAndConditions#vor
op_doi https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2435.12636
container_title Functional Ecology
container_volume 30
container_issue 10
container_start_page 1623
op_container_end_page 1637
_version_ 1800741280542621696