Conformational properties of native sperm whale apomyoglobin in solution
Abstract Apomyoglobin from sperm whale is often used for studies of ligand binding, protein folding, and protein stability. In an effort to describe its conformational properties in solution, homonuclear and heteronuclear ( 13 C and 15 N) NMR methods were applied to the protein in its native state....
| Published in: | Protein Science |
|---|---|
| Main Authors: | , , , |
| Format: | Article in Journal/Newspaper |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
Wiley
1999
|
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | http://dx.doi.org/10.1110/ps.8.7.1484 https://api.wiley.com/onlinelibrary/tdm/v1/articles/10.1110%2Fps.8.7.1484 https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1110/ps.8.7.1484 |
| Summary: | Abstract Apomyoglobin from sperm whale is often used for studies of ligand binding, protein folding, and protein stability. In an effort to describe its conformational properties in solution, homonuclear and heteronuclear ( 13 C and 15 N) NMR methods were applied to the protein in its native state. Assignments were confirmed for nuclear Overhauser effects (NOEs) involving side chain and backbone protons in the folded regions of the structure. These NOEs were used to derive distance restraints. The shifts induced by the hydrophobic dye 8‐anilino‐1‐naphthalenesulfonic acid (ANS) were inspected in the regions remote from its binding site and served as an indicator of conformational flexibility. 3 J αH‐NH values were obtained to assess dihedral angle averaging and to provide additional restraints. A family of structures was calculated with X‐PLOR and an ab initio simulated annealing protocol using holomyoglobin as a template. Where the structure appeared well defined by chemical shift, line width, ANS perturbation, and density of NOEs, the low resolution model of apomyoglobin provides a valid approximation for the structure. The new model offers an improved representation of the folded regions of the protein, which encompass the A, B, E, helices as well as parts of the G and H helices. Regions that are less well defined at this stage of calculations include the CD corner and the end of the H‐helix. The EF‐F‐FG segment remains uncharacterized. |
|---|