Feasibility of Tagging Walleye Pollock Captured with Hook and Line using External Tags

Abstract We evaluated methods of minimizing mechanical injury to Walleye Pollock Gadus chalcogrammus when tagging them with external identification tags. Walleye Pollock (20–62 cm FL) were captured with hook and line near Auke Bay, Southeast Alaska, and were tagged with either T‐bar anchor tags or l...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Published in:Marine and Coastal Fisheries
Main Authors: Rutecki, Thomas L., Ianelli, J. N.
Format: Article in Journal/Newspaper
Language:English
Published: Wiley 2016
Subjects:
Online Access:http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/19425120.2016.1167794
https://afspubs.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1080/19425120.2016.1167794
id crwiley:10.1080/19425120.2016.1167794
record_format openpolar
spelling crwiley:10.1080/19425120.2016.1167794 2024-06-02T08:04:23+00:00 Feasibility of Tagging Walleye Pollock Captured with Hook and Line using External Tags Rutecki, Thomas L. Ianelli, J. N. 2016 http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/19425120.2016.1167794 https://afspubs.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1080/19425120.2016.1167794 en eng Wiley http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ Marine and Coastal Fisheries volume 8, issue 1, page 374-381 ISSN 1942-5120 1942-5120 journal-article 2016 crwiley https://doi.org/10.1080/19425120.2016.1167794 2024-05-03T11:06:21Z Abstract We evaluated methods of minimizing mechanical injury to Walleye Pollock Gadus chalcogrammus when tagging them with external identification tags. Walleye Pollock (20–62 cm FL) were captured with hook and line near Auke Bay, Southeast Alaska, and were tagged with either T‐bar anchor tags or lock‐on tags, which were anticipated to be used for tagging studies in the Gulf of Alaska and Bering Sea. The tested handling procedures included transferring the tagged fish between live tanks either by using a dip net (dipnetted group) or with wet, bare hands (non‐dipnetted group). Sixty percent of the dipnetted fish (63 of 105) died, whereas 12% of the non‐dipnetted fish (17 of 138) died. Overall, 50% of the deaths occurred within 7 d after capture, and 89% of the deaths occurred within 10 d after capture. Of the dipnetted fish that died, 68% ( n = 43) died from dermal infection due to scale loss, whereas 30% of the non‐dipnetted fish mortalities were from dermal infection. Additionally, injuries that were recorded as potential mortality factors included fin loss, torn jaws, internal dysfunction, and unknown. All of the fish that received lock‐on tags and 93% of the fish that were anchor‐tagged developed an infection at the point of tag insertion. Tag retention rates were 99.5% for lock‐on tags and 93.7% for anchor tags, and tag type did not affect survival. Use of hook‐and‐line capture is an effective method for reducing mechanical injury and mortality in Walleye Pollock. Recommended procedures for capturing and tagging Walleye Pollock include the use of hook and line and the use of wet, bare hands (or a similar low‐abrasion approach) when handling the fish. Received July 13, 2015; accepted March 7, 2016 Article in Journal/Newspaper Bering Sea Alaska Wiley Online Library Bering Sea Gulf of Alaska Marine and Coastal Fisheries 8 1 374 381
institution Open Polar
collection Wiley Online Library
op_collection_id crwiley
language English
description Abstract We evaluated methods of minimizing mechanical injury to Walleye Pollock Gadus chalcogrammus when tagging them with external identification tags. Walleye Pollock (20–62 cm FL) were captured with hook and line near Auke Bay, Southeast Alaska, and were tagged with either T‐bar anchor tags or lock‐on tags, which were anticipated to be used for tagging studies in the Gulf of Alaska and Bering Sea. The tested handling procedures included transferring the tagged fish between live tanks either by using a dip net (dipnetted group) or with wet, bare hands (non‐dipnetted group). Sixty percent of the dipnetted fish (63 of 105) died, whereas 12% of the non‐dipnetted fish (17 of 138) died. Overall, 50% of the deaths occurred within 7 d after capture, and 89% of the deaths occurred within 10 d after capture. Of the dipnetted fish that died, 68% ( n = 43) died from dermal infection due to scale loss, whereas 30% of the non‐dipnetted fish mortalities were from dermal infection. Additionally, injuries that were recorded as potential mortality factors included fin loss, torn jaws, internal dysfunction, and unknown. All of the fish that received lock‐on tags and 93% of the fish that were anchor‐tagged developed an infection at the point of tag insertion. Tag retention rates were 99.5% for lock‐on tags and 93.7% for anchor tags, and tag type did not affect survival. Use of hook‐and‐line capture is an effective method for reducing mechanical injury and mortality in Walleye Pollock. Recommended procedures for capturing and tagging Walleye Pollock include the use of hook and line and the use of wet, bare hands (or a similar low‐abrasion approach) when handling the fish. Received July 13, 2015; accepted March 7, 2016
format Article in Journal/Newspaper
author Rutecki, Thomas L.
Ianelli, J. N.
spellingShingle Rutecki, Thomas L.
Ianelli, J. N.
Feasibility of Tagging Walleye Pollock Captured with Hook and Line using External Tags
author_facet Rutecki, Thomas L.
Ianelli, J. N.
author_sort Rutecki, Thomas L.
title Feasibility of Tagging Walleye Pollock Captured with Hook and Line using External Tags
title_short Feasibility of Tagging Walleye Pollock Captured with Hook and Line using External Tags
title_full Feasibility of Tagging Walleye Pollock Captured with Hook and Line using External Tags
title_fullStr Feasibility of Tagging Walleye Pollock Captured with Hook and Line using External Tags
title_full_unstemmed Feasibility of Tagging Walleye Pollock Captured with Hook and Line using External Tags
title_sort feasibility of tagging walleye pollock captured with hook and line using external tags
publisher Wiley
publishDate 2016
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/19425120.2016.1167794
https://afspubs.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1080/19425120.2016.1167794
geographic Bering Sea
Gulf of Alaska
geographic_facet Bering Sea
Gulf of Alaska
genre Bering Sea
Alaska
genre_facet Bering Sea
Alaska
op_source Marine and Coastal Fisheries
volume 8, issue 1, page 374-381
ISSN 1942-5120 1942-5120
op_rights http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/
op_doi https://doi.org/10.1080/19425120.2016.1167794
container_title Marine and Coastal Fisheries
container_volume 8
container_issue 1
container_start_page 374
op_container_end_page 381
_version_ 1800749014846537728