Comparison of different challenge methods to evaluate the efficacy of furunculosis vaccines in Atlantic salmon, Salmo salar L.

Four challenge methods, intraperitoneal (i.p.) and intramuscular (i.m.) inoculation, bath and cohabitation exposure, were evaluated as methods for testing the efficacy of furunculosis vaccines in Atlantic salmon, Salmo salar L. Groups of fish vaccinated with one of two different vaccines containing...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Published in:Journal of Fish Diseases
Main Authors: Nordmo, R, Ramstad, A
Format: Article in Journal/Newspaper
Language:English
Published: Wiley 1997
Subjects:
Online Access:http://dx.doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2761.1997.d01-114.x
https://api.wiley.com/onlinelibrary/tdm/v1/articles/10.1046%2Fj.1365-2761.1997.d01-114.x
https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1046/j.1365-2761.1997.d01-114.x
Description
Summary:Four challenge methods, intraperitoneal (i.p.) and intramuscular (i.m.) inoculation, bath and cohabitation exposure, were evaluated as methods for testing the efficacy of furunculosis vaccines in Atlantic salmon, Salmo salar L. Groups of fish vaccinated with one of two different vaccines containing aluminium phosphate or animal/vegetable oil as an adjuvant were challenged with Aeromonas salmonicida 6 and 12 weeks after vaccination. Relative per cent survival (RPS) was calculated daily during a 3‐week observation period post‐challenge. A large variation in protection measured by RPS, both between methods and between different time points for each method, was found. Towards the end of the observation period, RPS tended to be similar in the i.p. and cohabitation challenge groups. A high degree of protection was demonstrated for the oil adjuvanted vaccine. The i.m. challenge produced very low RPS numbers for both vaccines, but this was most marked for the aluminium‐phosphate‐adjuvanted vaccine. The bath exposure resulted in RPS values intermediate to the cohabitation and injection methods. The study also demonstrated that, after i.p. and i.m. challenges, the initial peak mortality caused by the inoculation was followed by a secondary increase in mortality, probably because of shedding of bacteria into the water during the first mortality phase and hence contributing to a superinfection state.